Prescribers prefer people: The sources of information used by doctors for prescribing suggest that the medium is more important than the message

AIMS: The sources of prescribing information are legion but there is little knowledge about which are actually used in practice by doctors when prescribing. The aims of this study were to determine the sources of prescribing information considered important by doctors, establish which were used in practice, and investigate if hospital and primary care physicians differed in their use of the sources. METHODS: Two hundred general practitioners (GPs) and 230 hospital doctors were asked to rate information sources in terms of their importance for prescribing 'old' and 'new' drugs, and then to name the source from which information about the last new drug prescribed was actually derived. RESULTS: Among 108 GPs, the Drugs and Therapeutics Bulletin and medical journal articles were most frequently rated as important for information on both old and new drugs while pharmaceutical representatives and hospital/consultant recommendations were more important for information on new drugs, as opposed to old. In practice, information on the last new drug prescribed was derived from pharmaceutical representatives in 42% of cases and hospital/consultant recommendations in 36%, with other sources used infrequently. Among 118 hospital doctors, the British National Formulary (BNF) and senior colleagues were of greatest theoretical importance. In practice, information on the last new drug prescribed was derived from a broad range of sources: colleagues, 29%; pharmaceutical representatives, 18%; hospital clinical meetings, 15%; journal articles, 13%; lectures, 10%. GPs and hospital doctors differed significantly in their use of pharmaceutical representatives (42% vs 18%) and colleagues (7% vs 29%) as sources of prescribing information (P < 0.0001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: The sources most frequently rated important in theory were not those most used in practice, especially among GPs. Both groups under-estimated the importance of pharmaceutical representatives. Most importantly, the sources of greatest practical importance were those involving the transfer of information through the medium of personal contact.     

合肥市某三甲综合医院医师/药师对国家组织集中采购药品用药行为的影响

目的 充分了解医师/药师对国家组织药品集中采购政策的认知程度与认可程度,为相关部门制定政策提供参考,推动国家组织集中采购药品（国家集采药品）工作。方法 对合肥市某三甲综合医院医师/药师开展问卷调查,调查问卷采用《“4+7”带量采购药品的医院药事管理与用药行为研究调查问卷》。应用Excel 2019软件对问卷收集数据进行统计分析。结果共收集1 022份有效问卷。其中,认知度调查结果显示62.07%的医师/药师表示非常熟悉或比较熟悉国家集采药品政策。此外,80.75%的医师/药师非常赞同或赞同该项政策。认可度调查结果显示81.90%的医师/药师在临床中会优先使用中选品种。用药习惯调查结果显示41.09%的医师/药师会针对所有病人均优先推荐使用中选品种。医师/药师针对国家集采药品政策在医院内部的执行措施给出了建议。结论 医师/药师对国家集采药品政策的认知度和认可度较高,但对仿制药的质量信心不足,建议医院从多方面加强对国家集采药品的宣传,增强医师使用意愿。     

Assessing the information in the Summaries of Product Characteristics for the use of medicines in pregnancy and lactation

AimsTo assess the completeness and applicability of information for the use of medicines in pregnancy and lactation contained in European Summaries of Product Characteristics (SmPCs).MethodsSmPCs available on the EMA website in April 2011 were retrieved, and information on the use of medicines during pregnancy and lactation was analyzed. A form was designed to extract information regarding drug concentrations crossing the placenta, excretion of the drug in milk, the existence of pre-clinical and clinical studies and clinical experience describing the use of the medicine in pregnancy and lactation, medicine effects on human fertility, medicines use in women of child-bearing potential and specific recommendations for use during pregnancy and breastfeeding. SmPCs were classified as containing ‘conclusive’ or ‘ambiguous’ information depending on whether (or not) they provided clear instructions regarding medicine use in pregnancy and lactation.ResultsOf the 534 SmPCs, 89.3% did not mention whether the drug crossed the placenta, 67.6% indicated that there was no clinical experience during pregnancy and in 61.4% it was unknown whether the medicine was excreted in human milk. Recommendations for medicine use during pregnancy and breastfeeding were ambiguous in 57.0% and 16.5% of the SmPCs, respectively, and medicine use was restricted in over 90% SmPCs for both pregnancy and breastfeeding, despite no information supporting these restrictions being reported. The time elapsed since a SmPCs first approval was not associated with an increase in information quality.ConclusionsImportant information deficits on the use of medicines during pregnancy and breastfeeding were found in European SmPCs.     

Development of a tool to assess the completeness of drug information sources for health care professionals: A Delphi study

The aim of this study was to create a standard set of essential drug information items as a tool to assess the completeness of any type of drug information source, regardless of its length, using a Delphi consensus panel of European health care professionals. A compilation of drug-related information items was performed by searching several resources for health care professionals and a final list of 162 items was obtained. Fifty-seven experts in drug information from 23 different European countries were invited to participate in a three-round Delphi technique to obtain consensus on items considered essential and non-essential content of information. Consensus for the first, second, and third rounds was defined as ≥90%, ≥80%, and ≥75% agreement, respectively. Of the 57 experts invited, 32 completed the first round, 27 the second, and 29 the third. Consensus was achieved for 28.3% of the items in the first round, 49.3% in the second, and 58.3% in the third. The final cumulative consensus was 67.7% (n = 126) for items considered essential and 16.1% (n = 30) for items considered non-essential. The final tool obtained to assess the completeness of drug information sources was composed by 126 essential items grouped into 11 sections. This tool allows for the comparison of different information sources for the same medicine and the information content for different medicines in the same source.     

Design and development of a mobile app of drug information for people with visual impairment

BackgroundPeople with visual impairment presents difficulties to access the labels information of medicines. In this sense, technological tools can contribute to improve access to this information and the appropriate use of medicines in this population. However, currently, in Colombia, there are no tools to facilitate this process.ObjectiveTo design and development of a mobile app of drug information for people with visual impairment, which allows them to access information for the appropriate use of medicines.MethodsA user-centered design process is carried out in four phases was used: a) Identification the needs and barriers for appropriate use of medicines; b) Lifting of requirements, c) Interface design and prototyping, and development of the mobile app, and d) Usability test.ResultsThe study involved 48 people with visual disability, of which 69% required assistance for the use of medicines. The main barriers identified were access to information and dosing. A total of ten user requirements were identified, based on these and international accessibility standards FarmaceuticApp was designed and developed, incorporating the problems that were identified in the usability test.ConclusionA mobile app of drug information for people with visual impairment using a user-centered design process was designed and developed, highlighting the importance of involving the users and other stakeholders in the design and development m-health technologies. FarmaceuticApp could contribute to the appropriate use of medicines and improve therapeutic adherence, as well as autonomy and independence in people with visual impairment.     

Impact of a pharmacist led diabetes mellitus intervention on HbA1c,medication adherence and quality of life: A randomised controlled study

Malaysia is situated in Western Pacific region which bears 36.17% of total diabetes mellitus population. Pharmacist led diabetes interventions have been shown to improve the clinical outcomes amongst diabetes patients in various parts of the world. Despite high prevalence of disease in this region there is a lack of reported intervention outcomes from this region. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a pharmacist led intervention on HbA1c, medication adherence, quality of life and other secondary outcomes amongst type 2 diabetes patients. Method: Type 2 diabetes mellitus patients (n = 73) attending endocrine clinic at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre (UKMMC) were randomised to either control (n = 36) or intervention group (n = 37) after screening. Patients in the intervention group received an intervention from a pharmacist during the enrolment, after three and six months of the enrolment. Outcome measures such as HbA1c, BMI, lipid profile, Morisky scores and quality of life (QoL) scores were assessed at the enrolment and after 6 months of the study in both groups. Patients in the control group did not undergo intervention or educational module other than the standard care at UKMMC. Results: HbA1c values reduced significantly from 9.66% to 8.47% (P = 0.001) in the intervention group. However, no significant changes were noted in the control group (9.64–9.26%, P = 0.14). BMI values showed significant reduction in the intervention group (29.34–28.92 kg/m²; P = 0.03) and lipid profiles were unchanged in both groups. Morisky adherence scores significantly increased from 5.83 to 6.77 (P = 0.02) in the intervention group; however, no significant change was observed in the control group (5.95–5.98, P = 0.85). QoL profiles produced mixed results. Conclusion: This randomised controlled study provides evidence about favourable impact of a pharmacist led diabetes intervention programme on HbA1c, medication adherence and QoL scores amongst type 2 diabetes patients at UKMMC, Malaysia.     

Needs and use of drug information sources in community pharmacies: a questionnaire based survey in German-speaking Switzerland

OBJECTIVES: To explore the types of drug information used by pharmacists in daily practice, their needs and wishes concerning drug information and their opinions about future changes of pharmacy practice. METHODS: Postal survey to a random sample of 223 (26% out of 859) community pharmacies from the German-speaking part of Switzerland. The 48-item questionnaires were processed automatically with the Cardiff TELEform-Software. In addition, a telephone-survey to a random sample of 20 non-responders was performed in order to test for non-response bias. RESULTS: A total of 108 pharmacists (response rate 48%) reported that the official Swiss drug reference book is still the most popular source of drug information used to solve all kinds of drug related problems. The Internet as a source of drug information is of minor importance, even though 88% of the pharmacies have Internet access. Deficits in drug information were reported for paediatrics, phytotherapy, drugs during pregnancy/lactation and for therapy guidelines. According to 35% of the pharmacists, the importance of offering drug information to customers will increase in the future. Most of the pharmacists are not afraid that Internet pharmacies would replace them. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the majority of the community pharmacists are only partially satisfied with the sources of drug information currently available. The Internet still plays a minor role for solving drug-related problems in daily practice, even though the available infrastructure makes the community pharmacies able to use the Internet more frequently. The pharmacists need more websites tailored to their needs. The pharmacists have clear visions about possible future developments. They do, however, have to adopt quickly to the changes ahead in order to remain competitive.     

Evaluation of a medication error monitoring system to reduce the incidence of medication errors in a clinical setting

BackgroundMedication errors have significant health and economic consequences. Monitoring medication errors by implementing monitoring systems proved in the USA and European countries since 1990s to be an effective method for error detection, leading to improved safety at all levels of health care. Currently, China does not have a universal medication error monitoring system.ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of the Medication Error Monitoring System for the reduction of medication errors in Xiamen Maternity and Child Care Hospital.MethodsBetween January–June 2014, the Medication Error Monitoring System developed by Xiamen Maternity and Child Care Hospital was employed to monitor medication errors through error reporting by physicians and pharmacists. The errors collected by this system were then thoroughly assessed and addressed by specific improvements including more frequent training, introducing computerised prescribing systems and a bar-coding medicine dispensing system. Data collected from January–June 2015, was then compared with the data collected in 2014 to determine whether medication errors had been reduced.ResultsBetween 2014 and 2015, the total medication errors in prescribing and dispensing were reduced by approximately 27%. Compared with 2014, there was a marked reduction in the number of errors due to misdiagnoses and inappropriate usage/dosage in 2015, while the number of data entry errors increased and became the most common cause of medication error. The success rate of pharmacy interventions increased from 95.25% to 96.88%, albeit modest. However, across all medication errors in the stage of prescribing and dispensing, non-human-related errors significantly decreased from 44.25% in 2014 to 37.94% in 2015 with a p value of 0.021.ConclusionThe Medication Error Monitoring System is effective at monitoring medication error data, leading to a reduction in reported medication errors. Better training for hospital staff including doctors and pharmacists will be critical to reduce human-related medication errors in the hospital.     

Development of a process-oriented quality improvement strategy for the medicines pathway in nursing homes using the SEIPS model

Background and objectiveMedication errors in nursing homes are highly prevalent and occur in different stages of the medicines pathway. The application of the SEIPS (System Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety) model facilitates the identification of work system factors that contribute to errors. Therefore, the aim of our research was to investigate in-depth the medicines pathway in nursing homes by using the SEIPS model and to develop a set of key activities and aggregated key interventions to be used as a basis for quality-improvement strategies.MethodsA variety of qualitative methods, including observations, semi-structured interviews, the development of a flowchart, an expert meeting and a working symposium, were used to identify processes and work system components. Key interventions and activities were developed in three rounds (one development and two validation rounds) across the different research methods to fine-tune the defined key interventions and activities.ResultsOur analysis revealed a large variety of tasks as well as persons elements, aspects related to technology and tools, organisational factors and environmental elements that all interact and influence the medicines pathway. The large number of tasks could be linked to eight overarching processes: prescribing, purchase and ordering, delivery, storage, preparation, administration, monitoring and (re-)admission. After three rounds (one development and two validation rounds), a final set of 137 key activities and 27 aggregated key interventions, concretising the eight processes, was obtained.ConclusionThe in-depth analysis of processes within the medicines pathway in nursing homes resulted in a set of key activities and aggregated key interventions which may serve as a basis for the nursing home sector and policy makers to enhance a safe and efficient medicines pathway.