Intensive therapy for small-cell lung cancer using carboplatin alternating with cisplatin, ifosfamide, etoposide, mid-cycle vincristine, and radiotherapy.

Forty patients with small-cell lung cancer (31 patients with limited-stage [LS] disease, and nine patients with extensive-stage [ES] disease but of good performance status) have been treated with an intensive therapy composed of carboplatin alternating with cisplatin, ifosfamide, and etoposide with vincristine on day 14 of each carboplatin cycle. A maximum of six cycles were administered at 3 weekly intervals after the cisplatin combination and 4 weekly after the carboplatin combination. Prophylactic cranial irradiation was given with the first cycle of chemotherapy and thoracic irradiation with the third cycle. The median nadir for neutrophils was 0.47 x 10(9)/L and for platelets, 40 x 10(9)/L. Chemotherapy dosages were not reduced in response to myelosuppression, but treatment was delayed to allow blood count recovery. Sixty-eight percent of patients received all six cycles of chemotherapy, and there were four deaths associated with treatment-related neutropenia. Twenty-eight patients (70%) achieved a complete response (CR) when assessed 1 month after the end of treatment, and a further five patients (12.5%) had a partial response (PR). Median duration of CR was 16 months and of PR, 8 months. Cerebral metastases occurred in 20% of all patients and was the apparent sole site of relapse in 11% of the CR patients. The median survival of the total group was 14 months with an actual 2-year survival of 30% and a minimum follow-up of 28 months.     

Etoposide,carboplatin, cyclophosphamide and vincristine in previously untreated patients with small-cell lung cancer

Summary The efficacy and toxicity of 120 mg/m² etoposide and 100 mg/m² carboplatin given i.v. daily x 3 together with 750 mg/m² cyclophosphamide and 14 mg/m² vincristine given i.v. on day 1 (ECCO) in a regimen given every 28 days for 6 courses was assessed in 90 (40 limited stage, 50 extensive stage) previously untreated patients with small-cell lung cancer. Mediastinal irradiation using 50 Gy in 25 fractions was given to limitedstage patients without progression after 3 courses of chemotherapy. Cranial irradiation with 30 Gy in 10 fractions was given to all patients attaining a complete response (CR). Objective responses were seen in 83% [CR, 60%; partial response (PR), 23%] of patients with limited and 76% (CR, 22%; PR, 54%) of those with extensive disease. The median relapse-free survival for objective responders with limited disease was 13.4 months, with a median of 8.0 months for extensive-stage patients. The median relapse-free survival for patients achieving a CR was 13.4 months, with a median of 7.8 months for those undergoing a PR. The median survival was 13.3 months for patients with limited disease, with a median of 9.6 months for those with extensive disease. The median survival following a CR was 18.2 months, with a median survival of 9.9 months for those showing a PR. The combination was well tolerated, with either no nausea or nausea only (WHO grade 0 or 1) in 56% of patients and minimal mucositis, renal toxicity, neurotoxicity or ototoxicity. Neutropenia measuring <1.0×10⁹ WBC/l (WHO grade 3 or 4) was seen in 74% of patients, with two deaths due to infection occurring during neutropenia. Thrombocytopenia of <50×10⁹ platelets/l (WHO grade 3 or 4) occurred in 24% of patients. ECCO is a new, active, welltolerated program for previously untreated patients with small-cell lung cancer.This study was partly supported by David Bull Laboratories, Melbourne, and the Anti-Cancer Council of Victoria     

VP-16-213 in combination chemotherapy with chest irradiation for small-cell lung cancer: a randomized trial of the Piedmont Oncology Association

The role of etoposide epipodophyllotoxin (VP-16-213) in a combined modality treatment program incorporating local chest irradiation and combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin (Adria Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio), and vincristine has been evaluated in a randomized trial of 165 patients with small-cell lung cancer. The overall response rate (complete response [CR] plus partial response [PR]) was significantly greater in the VP-16-213 arm (85% v 64%, P = .005) primarily as a consequence of improved response in patients with extensive disease (85% v 38%, P = .002 and 30% v 8% for CR only, P = .045). No differences in the response rates were observed in limited disease. The duration of response (months) was greater in the VP-16-213 arm (8.6 v 7.0 overall and 14.4 v 11.5 for CR) but not significantly so. Median survival times (months) were consistently greater in the group receiving VP-16-213 when analyzed according to extent of disease and response (10.6 v 9.5 overall; 15.0 v 13.6 for limited disease; 9.0 v 6.7 for extensive disease; 18.5 v 16.2 for CR overall; and 18.6 v 16.1 for CR in limited disease); the results were not statistically significant. The median survival of extensive disease patients attaining a CR was 15.3 months (range 3.2 to 34.3 + months) in the VP-16-213 arm and 7.4+ and 8.1+ months for the two patients with CR in the other group. Anemia and leukopenia occurred to a greater degree in the four-drug regimen, but no unusual or significant compounding toxicity (ie, neurotoxicity) was observed otherwise. Further investigation of this agent in combination chemotherapy programs for small-cell lung cancer appears to be warranted.     

Review of the comparative pharmacology and clinical activity of cisplatin and carboplatin.

PURPOSE: To review the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, toxicities, and relative clinical activities of cisplatin and carboplatin. Through a search of the MEDLINE database, we identified phase III clinical trials and pharmacologic studies comparing cisplatin and carboplatin published in the English language medical literature from January 1966 to December 1997. RESULTS: Prospective randomized trials comparing cisplatin to carboplatin were identified for ovarian (n = 12), germ cell (n = 4), non-small-cell lung (n = 1), small-cell lung (n = 3), and head and neck (n = 4) cancers. Carboplatin and cisplatin were equally effective in suboptimally debulked ovarian cancer and extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. One study each showed a trend toward better survival in favor of cisplatin for patients with optimally debulked ovarian and limited-stage small-cell lung cancers. These results were, however, based on subset analyses. In germ cell tumors, carboplatin was inferior because of lower relapse-free survival rates. Cisplatin produced superior response rates and survival in head and neck cancers. There are no published randomized phase III studies of bladder, cervical, endometrial, and esophageal cancers. CONCLUSION: Carboplatin does not possess equivalent activity to cisplatin in all platinum-sensitive tumors. Carboplatin can replace cisplatin in chemotherapy regimens for suboptimally debulked ovarian cancer. Two ongoing studies will address the same question in optimally debulked disease. Carboplatin can also be substituted for cisplatin in the treatment of non-small-cell and extensive-stage small-cell lung cancers. Its role in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer needs to be investigated further. Carboplatin is inferior to cisplatin in germ cell, head and neck, and esophageal cancers. Randomized studies are needed to determine whether carboplatin has equivalent efficacy to cisplatin in bladder, cervical, and endometrial cancers.     

The Role of Advanced Imaging in Assessing Response to Definitive Chemoradiation Before Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation in Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Introduction

Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) improves survival for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Evidence for PCI in limited-stage SCLC largely derives from studies requiring only chest x-ray (CXR) to determine remission status. We analyzed thoracic chemoradiation therapy (TCRT) outcomes according to imaging modality to determine which patients benefitted most from PCI.

Three months' treatment with cyclophosphamide, VP-16-213 followed by methotrexate and thoracic radiotherapy for small cell lung cancer

One hundred eleven patients with inoperable but limited-stage small cell lung cancer were treated with three courses of cyclophosphamide (1.5, 2.5, and 3.5 g/m2, respectively) and VP-16-213 followed by methotrexate and thoracic radiotherapy. The total duration of treatment was 3 months. Patients were included who had pleural effusions, contralateral neck nodes, and bone marrow infiltration. The complete response (CR) rate was 56%, the majority confirmed by repeat bronchoscopy, with an 81% overall response rate. The minimum follow-up was 14 months. Median survival for all 111 patients was 11 months and 14 months (1-34+) for complete responders; the median survival was also 11 months for the 91 patients with conventional limited-stage disease, although 15 of the 19 patients alive at 14 months or more were from this subpopulation. There was no significant difference in the survival of those CR patients whose response was confirmed bronchoscopically and patients whose CR was assessed only radiologically and clinically. Forty-four patients with leukopenia (less than 1000 cells/microliter) received intravenous antibiotics for malaise and suspected infection. Close monitoring between treatments and direct access of patients to the hospital was encouraged. The majority of patients improved symptomatically as assessed by Karnofsky and Respiratory scores. These results support the view that short but intensive treatment without long-term or maintenance chemotherapy is beneficial.     

High-dose intensification therapy with autologous bone marrow support for limited small-cell bronchogenic carcinoma

The efficacy and toxicity of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) was studied in 32 patients with untreated limited small-cell bronchogenic carcinoma (SCBC). Ten patients received three courses of induction therapy consisting of vincristine (VCR) (1.5 mg X 2), ifosfamide (5 g/m2), and Adriamycin (Ad; Adria Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio) (60 mg/m2). Patients then received two courses of intensification therapy with cyclophosphamide (CYT) (4.5 g/m2), 4' demethyl-epipodophyllotoxin-d-D-ethylidene glucoside (VP-16-213) (600 mg/m2) and VCR (2 mg) with ABMT. Another 22 patients received induction therapy with VCR, CYT (600 mg/m2), Ad (50 mg/m2), and VP-16-213 (180 mg/m2). All 22 patients also received intensification therapy of the same dose of CYT (4.5 g/m2) and VP-16-213 (600 mg/m2). Nine patients also received high-dose methotrexate (MTX), four patients received Ad (40 to 60 mg/m2), and two patients received both Ad and MTX. After intensification, patients received elective prophylactic brain irradiation (3,000 rad) and chest irradiation (5,000 rad). After induction therapy, there were 13 (41%) complete remissions (CR) and 17 (53%) partial remissions (PR). After intensification therapy, there were 22 CRs (69%) and 10 PRs (31%). Median survival for all patients was 14 months (range, 5 to 59+). Of the 13 patients who received intensification therapy in CR, five remain disease free (DF), four for 4 years or longer. Of the nine patients to achieve CR with intensification, only one is DF. No patient died during intensification. In conclusion, intensification with high-dose chemotherapy can increase the CR rate, and this approach is most likely to show long-term benefits in patients with minimal disease (CR) at the beginning of intensification therapy.     

A Phase II Study of Carboplatin and Prolonged Administration of Oral Etoposide in Patients with Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Prolonged oral administration of etoposide may have a theoretical advantage over intravenous infusion, and carboplatin has a more favorable toxicity profile than cisplatin. A combination of carboplatin 300 mg/m² and oral etoposide 40 mg/m²/day for 21 days was assessed in 74 (42 limited, 32 extensive disease) previously untreated patients with small-cell lung cancer. Response rate was 69% (CR 19%, PR 50%) for limited disease and 72% (CR 9%. PR 63%) for extensive disease. Median response duration and overall survival was 6.6 and 10.1 months for limited disease, and 5.3 and 9.1 months for extensive disease, respectively. One-year and two-year survival was 36 and 10% for limited disease and 31 and 2% for extensive disease, respectively. The major toxicity was hematological with grade 4 or greater neutropenia in 36% and grade 4 thrombocytopenia in 16% and one patient died of neutropenic fever. Non-hematologic toxicities were mild and grade 3 emesis was observed in 5% of patients. Carboplatin combined with 21-day oral etoposide showed only modest activity against small-cell lung cancer with high toxicity and did not merit further evaluation.     

Late intensification chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation in selected small-cell carcinoma of the lung: a randomized study

A multicentric randomized prospective trial was conducted to test whether late intensification chemotherapy would increase the remission rate, the relapse-free survival, and the survival of small-cell lung cancer patients responding to induction chemotherapy. Autologous bone marrow transplantation was used as support to reduce the duration of the aplasia induced by very high-dose chemotherapy. As induction chemotherapy, 101 patients received, during a period of 5 months, a total dosage of 120 mg/m2 methotrexate, 4.5 mg/m2 vincristine, 1,800 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide, 180 mg/m2 doxorubicin, 160 mg/m2 cisplatin, 750 mg/m2 VP-16-213, and 30 Gy prophylactic cranial irradiation. Forty-five patients, selected for their sensitivity to this induction treatment, were randomized to a last cycle of chemotherapy that combined cyclophosphamide, BCNU, and VP-16-213 either at a conventional dosage of 750 mg/m2 intravenously (IV), 60 mg/m2 IV, and 600 mg/m2 orally or alternatively at a very high dosage of 6 g/m2 IV, 300 mg/m2 IV, and 500 mg/m2 IV, respectively. In the late intensification group, the complete remission rate increased from 39% before randomization to 79% after high-dose chemotherapy. Median relapse-free survivals after randomization for intensified and control chemotherapy groups were 28 and 10 weeks, respectively (P = .002). Median overall survival after induction therapy was 68 weeks for the intensified group compared with 55 weeks for the conventional therapy group (P = .13). Four patients died during intensification. Patients in both groups relapsed at the primary site. It can thus be concluded that late intensification chemotherapy for sensitive small-cell lung cancer increases the complete remission rate and resulted in a statistically significant increase in the relapse-free survival. However, since relapse occurred at the primary site and toxicity was high, overall survival was not significantly improved.     

Late intensive combined modality therapy followed by autologous bone marrow infusion in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer

To attempt to improve the poor prognosis of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients, we tried to administer late intensive combined modality therapy (LICMRX) to patients with good tumor regression after 12 weeks of conventional chemotherapy. Twenty-nine consecutive extensive-stage SCLC patients received 6 weeks of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and lomustine (CMC) induction therapy, followed by 6 weeks of vincristine, doxorubicin, and procarbazine (VAP). After restaging for assessment of tumor response, autologous bone marrow (ABM) was collected in patients in good medical condition with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) and no tumor on marrow examination. LICMRX consisted of irradiation with 2,000 rad in five fractions for five days to sites of initial tumor involvement, followed by cyclophosphamide, 60 mg/kg for 2 days, and etoposide, 200 mg/m2 for 3 days and then by ABM infusion. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) was administered thereafter, but no further chemotherapy was used. Due to lack of tumor regression or poor medical condition, only ten of the original 29 patients were eligible for LICMRX; two refused, so only eight (28%) received therapy. Three patients who began LICMRX in CR developed recurrence of SCLC after an additional 4, 8, and 15 months. Of five patients with PR, one attained CR but relapsed at 3 months, two remained in PR and progressed at 2 and 4 months, and two died of infection without recovery from LICMRX. Mean time from ABM infusion to recovery of granulocyte count to 500/microL was 15.8 days in the six surviving patients (range, 12-22). The major non-hematologic toxicity of LICMRX was severe esophagitis. Among all 29 patients, there were six CRs (21%) and no 2-year survivors, compared with a CR rate of 36% and 10% 2-year survivors in 78 extensive-stage patients previously treated with CMC plus VAP without LICMRX. We conclude that the LICMRX given in this study can be administered to only a minority of extensive-stage SCLC patients and is very unlikely to yield substantial improvement in the fraction of 2-year survivors (95% confidence limits for 2-year survival 0% to 10%).     

Carboplatin, etoposide, and ifosfamide as intensive chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer

Thirty-two previously untreated, fit patients with small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) were treated with an intensive combination chemotherapy regimen, with the aim of prolonging survival, as follows: carboplatin 400 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) day 1, ifosfamide 5 g/m2 IV day 1 in a 24-hour infusion with mesna, and etoposide 100 mg/m2 IV days 1 to 3, repeating at 28-day intervals for six courses. Limited-disease (LD) patients were given concurrent hyperfractionated radiotherapy for the first two courses, and all patients achieving a complete remission (CR) were offered prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI). For 18 LD patients, the overall response was 94% with 72% CRs. For 14 extensive-disease (ED) patients the overall response was 100% with 29% CRs. Median response duration for LD patients was 11.5 months and for ED patients 7.5 months. Median survival for LD patients was 19 months with a predicted 24% 2-year survival and for ED patients 9.5 months with a predicted 14% 2-year survival. Hematologic toxicity was severe with 100% developing World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3-4 neutropenia and 94% WHO grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia during treatment. Seventy-two percent of patients required a dose reduction at some stage during treatment because of neutropenic infection or thrombocytopenia requiring platelet transfusions. Despite very high response rates, this intensive regimen achieves survival results only modestly better, if at all, than those reported for less toxic conventional regimens.     

Therapy for poor-risk patients with small-cell lung cancer using bolus ifosfamide and oral etoposide

A total of 47 poor-risk small-cell lung cancer patients (elderly, poor performance status, recent myocardial infarction, or extensive-stage disease with biochemical abnormalities) were treated with a regimen of bolus ifosfamide at 1.5 g/m2 with equidose mesna as a 30-min infusion, followed by 100 mg oral etoposide daily for 8 days. Therapy was repeated every 3 weeks. The overall response rate was 60% (75% for limited-stage and 48% for extensive-stage disease), and the overall median survival was 7 months. Patients' performance status significantly improved with therapy (P less than 0.0001). Despite the poor-risk factors, the Manchester prognostic score was applied and verified. The median survival was 8 months for patients with a good prognosis, 6 months for those with an intermediate prognosis and 2.5 months for poor-prognosis patients (P = 0.0002). Therapy was well tolerated. The median WHO grade of haematological toxicity was 2 (range, 0-4). Only 10/226 (4%) courses were delayed due to leukopenia. Blood transfusions followed 18/226 (8%) courses. Intravenous antibiotics were given following 15/226 (7%) courses. No patient required platelet support. Poor-risk patients who have a good or intermediate Manchester prognostic score may benefit from this low-toxicity regimen.     

Teniposide and etoposide in previously untreated small-cell lung cancer: a randomized study.

A randomized study comparing teniposide (VM-26) and etoposide (VP-16) was performed to investigate whether there are any differences in the activity and toxicity of these two analogs in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Only previously untreated patients with SCLC were included; 46 and 48 patients receiving VP-16 and VM-26, respectively, are assessable for response. There were no differences between the two groups with respect to extent of disease, median age, and performance status (PS). The initial doses were for both compounds 70 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) daily for 5 days every 3 weeks. After inclusion of 25 patients in the study, the doses were increased to 80 mg/m2 for VM-26 and 90 mg/m2 for VP-16 because of differences in toxicity. VM-26 caused more hematologic toxicity than VP-16 throughout the study. The overall responses (complete response [CR] plus partial response [PR]) were 65% for VP-16 and 71% for VM-26, with CR occurring in 24% and 23%, respectively, for the two compounds. Median survival was 8.5 months for VP-16-treated patients versus 11.3 months for VM-26-treated patients (P = .58). It is concluded that both VP-16 and VM-26 are highly active single agents in SCLC.     

Adriamycin, bleomycin, DIC, CCNU, and prednisone (ABDIC) chemotherapy in MOPP-resistant Hodgkin's disease

ABDIC was administered to 32 patients with MOPP-resistant Hodgkin's disease. Three were considered nonevaluable because of early death. All patients had received MOPP (medium of eight cycles), and five had also received other chemotherapy. Major radiotherapy had been used in 18 of the 29. Complete remission (CR) occurred in 10 of 29 (34.5%), partial remissions (PR) in 14 (48.2%), and no remissions (NR) in five (17.2%). Median survival and relapse-free survival for CR patients exceeded 28 months. Two relapsed at 8 and 18 months; one died at 9 1/2 months, and the other is disease-free with other treatment at 35 months. Seven of the remaining eight patients are alive without disease (10-35 months); 4 are on maintenance therapy, and the other died from an infection and eosinophilic granuloma of lung without evidence of recurrent Hodgkin's disease. Median survival of PR patients was eight months. One patient with Hodgkin's disease involving the liver is alive at 36 months with further therapy. Median survival of NR patients is 2.5 months, and all died within seven months. Survival of CR patients is greater than PR and NR patients (P = 0.002), and that of PR is greater than NR (P = 0.01). Four of the 29 patients had nodal relapse, and 25 had parenchymal relapse, with no difference in response rates (P = 0.47). ABDIC is useful in Hodgkin's disease patients who have had extensive prior chemotherapy and radiotherapy.     

Concurrent radiochemotherapy for patients with stage III non-small–cell lung cancer (NSCLC): long-term results of a phase II study

Purpose: To investigate the feasibility and activity of concurrent radiochemotherapy in patients with Stage III nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Materials and Methods: Forty-one patients were treated with hyperfractionated radiation therapy (HfxRT) using 1.2 Gy bid, to a total of 69.6 Gy and concurrent low-dose daily chemotherapy (CHT) consisting of 30 mg of carboplatin (CBDCA) and 30 mg of etoposide (VP-16) given Mondays to Fridays during the RT course. On Saturdays and Sundays during the RT course, CBDCA and VP-16 were both given in a daily dose of 100 mg each.

Results: Median survival time was 25 months, and 3- and 5-year survival rates were 34% and 29%, respectively. Median relapse-free survival time was 22 months, and 3- and 5-year relapse-free survival rates were 32%, and 29%, respectively. Median time to local recurrence was 24 months and 3- and 5-year local recurrence-free survival rates were 41% and 38%, respectively. Median time to distant metastasis was 28 months, and 3- and 5- year distant metastasis-free survival rates were 44% and 44%, respectively. Acute high-grade (≥ 3) toxicity was mostly hematological (30%), esophageal (15%), and bronchopulmonary (12%). Late high-grade toxicity was infrequent.

Conclusion: This combined radiochemotherapy regimen produced promising results and warrants further studies with more patients before testing it in a prospective randomized fashion.     

Docetaxel-carboplatin chemotherapy combined with cetuximab in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)--results of the nonrandomised phase II study TaxErb

This open label, single arm phase II study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the addition of cetuximab to first line chemotherapy with carboplatin and weekly docetaxel in patients with advanced non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). From February 2007 to December 2008 74 patients with NSCLC (stage IIIB and IV), ECOG PS ≤2 and no prior systemic chemotherapy were enrolled and treated with carboplatin (area under the curve=5 on day 1) and docetaxel (35 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15). Cycles were repeated every 4 weeks for a minimum of 4 and a maximum of 6 cycles. Cetuximab (400mg/m(2) on day 1 with subsequent doses of 250 mg/m(2) weekly) was administered until progression or intolerable toxicity up to a maximum treatment duration of 12 months. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (CR+PR) according to RECIST. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. Patients received a median of 4 cycles of docetaxel-carboplatin-chemotherapy. The median number of administrations of cetuximab was 14. Sixty-seven patients were evaluable for response. Partial response was seen in 29/67 patients corresponding to an overall response rate (ORR) of 43.3% (95%CI, 28.5-53.7). No patient experienced complete response. The clinical benefit rate (PR+SD) was 79.1%. The 1-year rates for PFS and OS were 11.2% and 64.4%, respectively. Median PFS was 4.8 months (95%CI, 3.70-5.31) and median OS 12.9 months (95%CI 8.26-∞). Adverse events were mainly grades 1-2. Skin toxicity (76% of pts), dyspnea (36.5%) and anemia (31.1%) were most frequent. Results from this phase II study suggest that the addition of cetuximab to first-line doublet carboplatin and weekly docetaxel results in a considerable clinical efficacy with an acceptable toxicity profile for patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC.     

Sequential dose-dense paclitaxel followed by topotecan in untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a Spanish Lung Cancer Group phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Poor survival rates in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients prompted us to evaluate a sequential dose-dense schedule of paclitaxel followed by topotecan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-three patients with previously untreated, extensive-stage SCLC received three cycles of paclitaxel 250 mg/m(2) over 3 h every 14 days followed by three cycles of topotecan 2.5 mg/m(2) for 5 days every 21 days. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was given after every cycle. Patients progressing at any time and those not achieving complete response (CR) subsequently received four cycles of standard-dose etoposide-cisplatin. RESULTS: A total of 118 cycles of paclitaxel were administered with minimal hematological toxicity. Grade 2/3 peripheral neuropathy was observed in 21% of patients. Response rate to paclitaxel was 48.8%, and 25.6% had stable disease (SD). Thirty-two patients achieving SD or response to paclitaxel subsequently received a total of 90 topotecan cycles. Topotecan-related toxicities included febrile neutropenia in 15.6% of patients with one toxic death, grade 3/4 anemia in 25% of patients and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in 31.3%. Non-hematological toxicities were mild. At completion of sequential paclitaxel-topotecan treatment the overall response rate was 55.8% (22 partial response, two CRs). Median survival for all patients was 10.5 months and median progression-free survival was 8.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: Sequential treatment with dose-dense paclitaxel followed by topotecan is feasible despite significant hematological toxicity during topotecan treatment. This schedule is an active regimen in extensive-stage SCLC and merits further investigation.     

Phase II study of carboplatin and 1-h intravenous etoposide and paclitaxel in a novel sequence as first-line treatment of patients with small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of paclitaxel, carboplatin and etoposide when administered in combination to previously-untreated small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n=95) with limited-stage disease (LSD; n=45) or extensive-stage disease (ESD; n=50) from 14 Spanish hospitals were entered into the study. Etoposide was administered 80 mg/m(2)/day intravenous (i.v.) on days 1, 2 and 3, paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 3 and carboplatin area-under-the-concentration-time-curve=6; i.v. on day 3, of a 3-week cycle, and repeated for up to 6 cycles. RESULTS: The overall response (OR) rate was 74% (n=70; 32 complete, 38 partial). Although the OR in LSD and ESD patients was similar (73 vs 74%, respectively), the percentage complete response was significantly higher among the former (49 vs 20%). The main toxicities were grade 3-4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia (62 and 18%, respectively) and there were 3 toxic deaths. Other toxicities were rare or easily manageable. Disease-free survival and overall survival rates at 1 year were 53 and 70% in LSD and 18 and 39% in ESD patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that the combination of paclitaxel, etoposide and carboplatin has an anti-tumour activity in SCLC that is comparable to other combination regimens, and is well tolerated.     

Carboplatin and continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil for advanced head and neck cancer

Fifty-one patients with recurrent or advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck received carboplatin 70 mg/m²/day bolus × 5 days i.v. and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 1000 mg/m²/day by continuous infusion i.v. for 5 days as initial chemotherapy. There were four complete responders (CR) and 12 partial responders (PR). Durations of CR were 6.8 months, 7.2+ months and 14.8+ months with one patient lost to follow up after achieving CR. For objective responders the median relapse-free survival from the time of response was 5.3 months and survival from registration 11.7 months. The median survival for all patients was 4.8 months. The major toxicities were myelosuppression and mucositis. Neutropenia (<1.0 × 10⁹/l) occurred in 19% of patients, thrombocytopenia (<50 × 10⁹/l) in 17% and severe (WHO grade three or four) mucositis was experienced by 28% patients. This combination had less gastrointestinal and nephrotoxicity than platinum containing combinations and can be used in patients with a poorer performance status.     

Ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide with midcycle vincristine versus standard chemotherapy in patients with small-cell lung cancer and good performance status: clinical and quality-of-life results of the British Medical Research Council multicenter randomized LU21 trial.

PURPOSE: Ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide, and vincristine, alone and in combination, are highly active against small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). This trial was designed to investigate whether survival could be improved by a regimen of all four drugs (ICE-V) compared with standard chemotherapy in patients with SCLC and good performance status, and to assess the patients' quality of life (QL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive six cycles of either ICE-V at 4-week intervals without dose reduction or standard chemotherapy administered according to local practice. The recommended standard control regimens were cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide; and cisplatin and etoposide. RESULTS: A total of 402 patients were randomly assigned, and 350 (87%) patients have died. Overall survival was longer in the ICE-V group (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.91; P = .0049), median survival was 15.6 months in the ICE-V group and 11.6 months in the control group, and 2-year survival rates were 20% and 11%, respectively. There was no evidence that the relative survival benefit for ICE-V was less in extensive-stage than in limited-stage patients. An increased rate of septicemia was reported in the ICE-V group (15% v 7% in the control group), but this did not result in an increase in reported treatment-related deaths (four patients [2%] in both groups). The findings on QL were broadly similar in both groups, with some benefit in favor of ICE-V. CONCLUSION: Compared with standard chemotherapy, the ICE-V regimen improves overall survival without QL penalties, despite an increased but manageable level of toxicity.