Centrally acting drugs act as conditioned stimuli in a conditioned suppression of drinking task

An experiment was conducted to test whether centrally acting drugs could act as conditioned stimuli (CS) in a classical conditioning paradigm in which electric shock acted as the unconditioned stimulus (US) and suppression of drinking was used as an indicator of a conditioned response (CR). Thirsty rats were allowed to drink water during daily classical conditioning sessions which took place in their home cages. The CS was either a drug injected before the session or a cocktail of sensory stimuli (light+tone+vibration) turned on at the beginning of the session. Part way through some sessions the animals received electric foot shock as the US. Two different drugs and the sensory cocktail were used as CSs in a discriminated classical conditioning paradigm in which one drug or stimulus (the CS+) predicted the subsequent occurrence of shock, and the other two conditions acted as CS– stimuli and predicted absence of shock. After an average of 5.7 pairings of the CS+ with shock, conditioned suppression of drinking was observed; the CR occurred only during tests preceded by the CS+ drug or stimulus. At one time or another during the experiment, pentobarbital, phencyclidine, morphine, and pentylenetetrazol were employed as the CS+. Each acquired the ability to elicit a CR, although pentobarbital was noticeably less effective than the other three drugs. All conditioning trials took place in hanging metal cages, but the CR generalized into plastic cages with sawdust floors. Each rat received three successive phases of conditioning with a different CS+ condition employed in each phase; each phase of conditioning was followed by extinction of the CR. Speed of acquisition and speed of extinction of the CR remained relatively uniform across successive phases. The results suggest that centrally acting drugs can act as conditioned stimuli in a classical conditioning paradigm when suppression of drinking is used as the CR.     

Characterization of nicotine's ability to serve as a negative feature in a Pavlovian appetitive conditioning task in rats

Rationale Pavlovian feature negative discriminations have been widely used to understand inhibitory conditioning processes using exteroceptive stimuli. Comparatively little is known about inhibitory conditioning processes using a drug state as a negative feature. A negative feature signals that presentation of a conditional stimulus (CS) will not be paired with an unconditioned stimulus. Objectives The present research examined whether nicotine served as a negative feature and started characterizing its properties. Methods and results In acquisition, rats received intermixed saline and nicotine (0.4 mg/kg, base) sessions. On saline sessions, a 15-s light CS was paired with 4-s access to sucrose; the CS was presented on nicotine sessions, but sucrose was withheld. The discrimination was acquired with more goal tracking during the CS on saline sessions. Nicotine's inhibition of this conditioned response (CR) was sensitive to nicotine dose (ED₅₀=0.225) and injection to testing interval (CR returned at 200 min). Mecamylamine pretreatment, but not hexamethonium, produced a loss of inhibitory control by nicotine suggesting a role for central nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Amphetamine, bupropion, arecoline, and chlordiazepoxide, but not caffeine, substituted for the nicotine feature. However, in locomotor tests, amphetamine and bupropion increased activity; arecoline and chlordiazepoxide decreased activity. For this reason, the motor effects of these ligands could not be dissociated from substitution via shared stimulus properties. Conclusions This feature negative task provides a preclinical model for studying how drug states inhibit responding, although identifying the process(es) mediating CR inhibition will require further research.     

Nicotine as a conditioned stimulus: impact of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder medications

People diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are at an increased risk to start smoking and have greater difficulty quitting. Nicotine, one of the principal addictive components of tobacco smoke, functioned as a conditioned stimulus (CS) for intermittent sucrose delivery in a Pavlovian drug discrimination task with rats. This study compared the ability of commonly prescribed ADHD medications (i.e., methylphenidate, atomoxetine, and bupropion) and additional dopamine reuptake inhibitors (i.e., cocaine and GBR 12909) to substitute for the CS effects of nicotine. Atomoxetine was also used to antagonize these CS effects. Rats acquired the discrimination as evidenced by increased dipper entries in nicotine (0.2 mg base/kg) sessions as compared with saline sessions. Nicotine generalization was dose dependent. Bupropion (10 and 20 mg/kg), methylphenidate (10 mg/kg), and cocaine (5 and 10 mg/kg) partially substituted for the 0.2 mg/kg nicotine CS. Atomoxetine did not substitute for the nicotine CS; however, atomoxetine (1 to 10 mg/kg) partially blocked nicotine's CS effects. These results suggest that atomoxetine, bupropion, and/or methylphenidate may be effective treatments for people diagnosed with ADHD and addicted to nicotine.     

Extinction with varenicline and nornicotine, but not ABT-418, weakens conditioned responding evoked by the interoceptive stimulus effects of nicotine

The interoceptive stimulus effects of nicotine acquire control over behavior. This observation, among others, suggests that the stimulus effects of nicotine are important in the development and tenacity of tobacco dependence. Despite this importance, there has been little research examining whether non-reinforced presentations (extinction) of a ligand that share stimulus effects of nicotine will weaken responding controlled by nicotine. Rats were trained to discriminate nicotine (0.4 mg/kg) from saline using a discriminated goal-tracking task in which nicotine signaled intermittent access to sucrose; sucrose was withheld on saline sessions. Experiment 1 examined substitution for nicotine by ABT-418, nornicotine, epibatidine, varenicline, or cytisine in 4-min extinction tests. Experiments 2–5 [low-dose nicotine (0.05 mg/kg), ABT-418, nornicotine, or varenicline, respectively] examined whether substitution for nicotine would persist if extinction tests were increased to 20 min and repeated daily for 6 days. Finally, generalization of this extinction back to the nicotine training stimulus was assessed. Full substitution in brief 4-min extinction tests was seen for ABT-418, nornicotine, epibatidine, varenicline, and cytisine. Low-dose nicotine, ABT-418, nornicotine, and varenicline, evoked only a partial ‘nicotine-like’ response in the first 20-min extinction test. With repeated extinction, only low-dose nicotine, nornicotine, and varenicline continued to substitute. Extinction with nornicotine and varenicline transferred back to nicotine as indicated by a partial conditioned response to the training stimulus. Interpretations regarding ‘nicotine-like’ effects of a ligand depend on the nature of the test. Understanding the processes mediating transfer of extinction learning with potential pharmacotherapies may reveal new treatment targets.     

Conditioned Response Evoked by Nicotine Conditioned Stimulus Preferentially Induces c-Fos Expression in Medial Regions of Caudate-Putamen

Nicotine has both unconditioned and conditioned stimulus properties. Conditioned stimulus properties of nicotine may contribute to the tenacity of nicotine addiction. The purpose of this experiment was to use neurohistochemical analysis of rapidly developing c-Fos protein to elucidate neurobiological loci involved in the processing of nicotine as an interoceptive conditioned stimulus (CS). Rats were injected (SC) in an intermixed fashion with saline or nicotine (16 sessions of each) and placed in conditioning chambers where they were given one of the three conditions depending on group assignment: (a) nicotine paired 100% of the time with intermittent access to sucrose (nicotine-CS condition), (b) nicotine and saline each paired 50% of the time with sucrose (chamber-CS condition), or (c) no sucrose US control (CS-alone condition). Rats in the nicotine-CS condition acquired the discrimination as evidenced by goal-tracking (ie, increased dipper entries before initial sucrose delivery) only on nicotine sessions. The chamber-CS condition showed goal-tracking on all sessions; no goal-tracking was seen in the CS-alone condition. On the test day, rats in each condition were challenged with saline or nicotine and later assessed for c-Fos immunoreactivity. In concordance with previous reports, nicotine induced c-Fos expression in the majority of areas tested; however, learning-dependent expression was specific to dorsomedial and ventromedial regions of caudate-putamen (dmCPu, vmCPu). Only rats in the nicotine-CS condition, when challenged with nicotine, had higher c-Fos expression in the dmCPu and vmCPu. These results suggest that medial areas of CPu involved in excitatory conditioning with an appetitive nicotine CS.     

The conditional stimulus effects of nicotine vary as a function of training dose

Although past research has shown that the interoceptive effects of nicotine serve as a conditional stimulus using sucrose as the unconditioned stimulus, very little is known about the importance of dose. Accordingly, rats were assigned to 0.1, 0.2, or 0.4 mg nicotine base/kg as the training dose. Sucrose (4-s access) was delivered 36 times on nicotine sessions; sucrose was withheld on intermixed saline sessions. The discrimination was acquired for all groups, as measured by more photobeam breaks in the dipper receptacle before the first sucrose delivery on nicotine sessions, compared with a similar interval on saline sessions. Thirty nicotine sessions without sucrose deliveries (extinction) decreased conditioned responding with the 0.4 mg/kg dose maintaining higher responding than the lower doses. After reestablishing discrimination performance, rats were tested with their training dose at various injection-to-placement intervals. Conditioned responding diminished with longer intervals; 0.4 mg/kg nicotine-evoked conditioned responding at longer intervals. Subsequent generalization testing with nicotine or saline at the 5-min training interval found that conditioned responding was evoked by lower test doses in the 0.1 mg/kg group than in the other groups. Combined, this research demonstrates that the nicotine conditional stimulus shows some variation with training dose.     

Conditioned locomotion and place preference elicited by tactile cues paired exclusively with morphine in an open field

A novel version of the conditioned place preference (CPP) technique was used in an attempt to determine whether tactile stimuli previously associated with morphine elicit approach and sustained contact. Empirical support for this view has been equivocal, prompting some to question the validity of the CPP technique. In the present study, rats received, during conditioning, morphine (10 mg/kg, IP) paired exclusively with an open field floor made of four quadrants of one texture (CS+) and saline with another floor made of four quadrants of a different texture (CS–). On the test for CPP, rats were given saline and placed in an open field containing either 1, 2, or 4 quadrants of the CS+ (with 3, 2, 0 quadrants of the CS–, respectively). These animals showed high absolute CPP scores on the test, spending, on average, as much as 83% and 75% of their time on the CS+ when two and one CS+ quadrants, respectively, were present. Concurrent measures of activity indicated that animals were most active when all four quadrants were CS+ and least active when zero or one CS+ quadrant was present. Thus, once an animal approached and made contact with the CS+ it tended to maintain contact with this stimulus and to reduce its approach to and contact with other stimuli. The differentiating features of this version of the CPP technique, as well as the relationship between morphine-induced conditioned locomotion and CPP, are discussed.     

An extinction cue reduces spontaneous recovery of ataxic ethanol tolerance in rats

Rationale and objectives Ethanol ataxia experiments with rats investigated cue effects on conditioned tolerance. Spontaneous recovery (SR) was assessed 1 day and 18 days after extinction with conditioned stimuli (CSs) paired or unpaired with an ethanol unconditioned stimulus (US). Behavioral tolerance was assessed by not tilting the apparatus during conditioning. Non-associative processes were assessed post-conditioning with or without a buzzer cue. Boutons (1993, Psychol Bull 114:80–99) memory theory was tested using an extinction cue and an associatively neutral cue presented during SR testing.Methods Tolerance was conditioned to a room + strobelight CS by ethanol injections experienced on a tilting floor (standard conditioning). Controls received no ethanol or ethanol, either during the CS without the floor tilting or 11 h post-CS. SR testing occurred 1 day or 18 days after extinction (experiment 1). Conditioning was followed by tolerance and CR tests either with or without a 15-s buzzer cue (experiment 2). In extinction, the CS and cue occurred without ethanol; the cue occurred before 7% or none of the extinction trials. Testing occurred 18 days after extinction with or without that cue (experiment 3), or with an equally familiar (neutral) cue presented before conditioning (experiment 4). Results Tolerance developed without floor tilting. CS–US unpairings prevented tolerance. Tolerance SR occurred 18 days but not 1 day after extinction only after CS–US pairings (experiment 1). Post-conditioning tests showed no unconditioned effects of the cue (experiment 2). Testing with no cue 1 day after extinction with the cue resulted in no tolerance increase. The extinction cue reduced SR (experiments 3 and 4); the neutral cue did not (experiment 4).Conclusions Cues correlated with extinction reduce SR. Non-associative and practice processes, Boutons (1993, Psychol Bull 114:80–99) memory theory, alternative interpretations, and clinical implications are discussed.This research was supported by funding from Denison University.     

The effects of nicotine exposure during Pavlovian conditioning in rats on several measures of incentive motivation for a conditioned stimulus paired with water

Rationale

Nicotine enhances approach toward and operant responding for conditioned stimuli (CSs), but the effect of exposure during different phases of Pavlovian incentive learning on these measures remains to be determined.

Objectives

These studies examined the effects of administering nicotine early, late or throughout Pavlovian conditioning trials on discriminated approach behavior, nicotine-enhanced responding for conditioned reinforcement, extinction, and the reinstatement of responding for conditioned reinforcement. We also tested the effect of nicotine on approach to a lever-CS in a Pavlovian autoshaping procedure and for this CS to serve as a conditioned reinforcer.

Methods

Thirsty rats were exposed to 13 conditioning sessions where a light/tone CS was paired with the delivery of water. Nicotine was administered either prior to the first or last seven sessions, or throughout the entire conditioning procedure. Responding for conditioned reinforcement, extinction, and the reinstatement of responding by the stimulus and nicotine were compared across exposure groups. Separately, the effects of nicotine on conditioned approach toward a lever-CS during autoshaping, and responding for that CS as a conditioned reinforcer, were examined.

Results

Nicotine exposure was necessary for nicotine-enhanced responding for conditioned reinforcement and the ability for nicotine and the stimulus to additively reinstate responding on the reinforced lever. Nicotine increased contacts with a lever-CS during autoshaping, and removal of nicotine abolished this effect. Prior nicotine exposure was necessary for nicotine-enhanced responding reinforced by the lever.

Conclusions

Enhancements in the motivating properties of CSs by nicotine occur independently from duration and timing effects of nicotine exposure during conditioning.     

Plasma corticosterone in the rat in response to nicotine and saline injections in a context previously paired or unpaired with nicotine

Rationale Following repeated injections with nicotine paired with a distinctive environment, some studies have reported that the distinctive context becomes a conditioned stimulus (CS) capable of eliciting conditioned corticosterone (CORT) release. Conversely, other studies have found that exposure to the CS results in conditioned attenuation of nicotine-induced CORT release.Objective The present study was designed to examine whether these sets of separate findings could be replicated in animals exposed to the same experimental procedures within the same study.Methods CORT assessments were conducted in a distinctive context after independent groups of animals were injected with either saline or nicotine (1 mg/kg, salt) after five or ten nicotine injections either explicitly paired or unpaired with a distinctive context. The design also included groups of nicotine-naïve rats exposed to the experimental procedures and assessed for CORT levels following either nicotine or saline injections during their first, and after their fifth and tenth context exposures.Results CORT levels were higher after nicotine than after saline, and higher in the paired than in the unpaired condition. Exposure to the context without nicotine produced conditioned CORT release and exposure to the context did not attenuate nicotine-induced CORT release.Conclusions The results supported the notion that a CS associated with nicotine effects elicit a conditioned response (CR) in the form of CORT release. Future research will be needed to examine whether conditioned CORT release can explain the context-dependent attenuations of nicotine-induced CORT.     

Nicotine-induced enhancement of responding for conditioned reinforcement in rats: Role of prior nicotine exposure and α4β2 nicotinic receptors

Rationale

Stimuli associated with nicotine can become motivationally significant and may play a role in tobacco dependence. Previous work indicates that nicotine enhances responding for a conditioned reinforcer (CR).

Objectives

These studies examined the effects of prior exposure to nicotine on responding for a CR, persistence of this response, and the role of α4β2 or α7 nicotinic receptor subtypes.

Methods

Water deprived rats were given 13 Pavlovian conditioning sessions where a light/tone conditioned stimulus (CS) was paired with the delivery of water. Then, rats were presented with two levers: one delivered the CS (now a CR), the other was inactive. Experiments examined the effect of nicotine administered prior to Pavlovian conditioning sessions on approach behavior during CS presentations, operant responding for CR in the presence and absence of nicotine, and the persistence of responding for CR. The effects of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) antagonism with mecamylamine and α4β2 or α7 nAChR antagonism with dihydro-beta-erythroidine (DHβE) or methyllycaconitine (MLA) on nicotine-enhanced responding for CR were examined.

Results

Nicotine enhanced approach behavior during CS presentations and potentiated operant responding for CR, an effect sensitized as a result of nicotine exposure during conditioning. Responding for CR and its potentiation by nicotine was stable over multiple tests. Enhanced responding for the CR induced by nicotine was blocked by mecamylamine and DHβE, but not MLA.

Conclusions

Nicotine enhances Pavlovian discriminated approach and shows sensitized nicotine-induced enhancements in responding for CR, an effect depending on α4β2 nAChRs.     

Diminished conditioned responding to the nicotine stimulus by antidepressant drugs with differing specificity for the serotonin and norepinephrine transporter

People diagnosed with depression also tend to have a co-morbid nicotine addiction. Thus, there is interest in whether medications used to treat depression alter the effects of nicotine. This study assessed whether the antidepressant drugs citalopram, imipramine, and reboxetine, with differing specificity for the serotonin and norepinephrine transporter, altered responding controlled by the conditional stimulus (CS) effects of nicotine. Rats received intermixed 20-min nicotine (0.4 mg base/kg, SC) and saline sessions. On nicotine sessions, rats had intermittent access to sucrose; no sucrose was available on saline sessions. After discrimination performance stabilized and a nicotine generalization curve (0.025-0.4 mg/kg) was established, the antidepressant drugs were assessed. In these tests, rats were pretreated with citalopram (1-17 mg/kg), imipramine (1-17 mg/kg), or reboxetine (1-30 mg/kg) before the training dose of nicotine and placement in a chamber for a 4-min extinction test. At the higher doses, all three antidepressant drugs blocked responding evoked by the nicotine CS and decreased nicotine-induced hyperactivity. When these higher doses of citalopram, imipramine, and reboxetine were tested alone (no nicotine), they decreased chamber activity and/or dipper entries. Nevertheless, all three drugs produced partial or complete blockade of the CS effects of nicotine at doses that produced no effect on dipper entries or chamber entries. This finding suggests that both neurotransmitters play a role in the CS effects of nicotine and that modifications in these systems by antidepressants may be clinically relevant.     

Behavioral and neuropharmacological characterization of nicotine as a conditional stimulus

In rats, the pharmacological (interoceptive) effects of 0.4 mg/kg nicotine can serve as a conditional stimulus in a Pavlovian conditioning task. Nicotine administration is paired with intermittent access to a liquid sucrose unconditional stimulus; sucrose is withheld on saline sessions. An increase in sucrose receptacle entries (goal tracking) on nicotine sessions indicates conditioning. Rats were trained on a nicotine dose ((-)-1-Methyl-2-(3-pyridyl)pyrrolidine; 0.1, 0.2, or 0.4 mg base/kg, s.c.). Generalization was examined using 0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 mg/kg nicotine and saline. Some behavioral effects of nicotine have been attributed to dopamine and glutamate. Accordingly, potential blockade of the nicotine cue via the dopamine system was examined by administering (R)-(+)-7-Chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine hydrochloride (SCH-23390; 0.005, 0.01, and 0.03 mg/kg), 3-Chloro-5-ethyl-N-[[(2S)-1-ethyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)methyl]-6-hydroxy-2-methoxy-benzamide hydrochloride (eticlopride; 0.01, 0.03, 0.1, and 0.3 mg/kg), or N-[(1-Butyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)methyl]-4-cyano-1-methoxy-2-naphthalenecarboxamide (nafadotride; 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1, and 3 mg/kg) before nicotine. 2-Methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)pyridine hydrochloride (MPEP; 0.3, 1, and 3 mg/kg) and (5S,10R)-(+)-5-Methyl-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a,d]cyclohepten-5,10-imine maleate (MK-801; 0.01, 0.03, 0.1, and 0.2 mg/kg; dizocilpine) were used to examine possible glutamatergic components. Substitution tests were conducted with MPEP and nafadotride. Differential conditioned responding was acquired in the 3 groups. Conditioned responding generally decreased as the nicotine test dose moved away from the training dose; responding increased when 0.4 mg/kg trained rats were tested with 0.2 mg/kg. SCH-23390, eticlopride, nafadotride, and MPEP decreased conditioned responding on nicotine at doses that also decreased chamber activity. In contrast, MK-801 decreased goal tracking on nicotine without decreasing chamber activity, indicating a role for N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in expression of nicotine-evoked conditioned responding.     

Learning versus performance effects of cocaine on discriminative heart rate conditioning in rats

The study examined the effects of cocaine on learning and performance of a classically conditioned heart rate (HR) discrimination in rats involving two auditory conditioned stimuli (CSs). In the discrimination protocol, one CS (CS+) was paired with the shock unconditioned stimulus (US) on a consistent basis and the other CS (CS–) was always presented alone. Four groups received an IP injection of 1, 3, 10, or 30 mg/kg cocaine and a fifth group received saline. Shortly after the injections, all groups were given six CS-alone trials, followed by 24 randomly sequenced discrimination conditioning trials (12 CS+ and 12 CS–). Approximately 72 h later, all groups were given six test trials with each CS in the absence of cocaine to evaluate the presence or absence of discrimination learning. All cocaine groups showed impaired discrimination performance on the discrimination conditioning trials, reductions in early pretest CS-alone responses, and reductions in resting HR. However, on the non-drug test trials discrimination performance was normal in all cocaine groups. The results established that in spite of major changes in HR dynamics, learning of the HR discrimination was not affected by cocaine but that cocaine did interfere with the performance of the discrimination. Except for the highest 30 mg group, the performance decrement appeared to be related to a cocaine-produced reduction in the capacity to inhibit bradycardia responding to the safe CS–. It was suggested that this loss of inhibitory control may have been due to cocaine changes in a corticothalamic pathway that controls inhibition of bradycardia to a safe CS–.     

The interoceptive Pavlovian stimulus effects of caffeine

The present research sought to test whether caffeine functioned as a Pavlovian cue in two ways--as a positive drug feature or as a conditional stimulus (CS). As a positive feature (Experiment 1), brief light presentations were followed by sucrose only on sessions in which caffeine (10 mg/kg) was administered. On intermixed saline sessions, light presentations were not followed by sucrose. The light came to control robust goal tracking (i.e., conditioned responding) only in caffeine sessions. Thus, caffeine disambiguates when the light was paired with sucrose. Decreasing the dose of caffeine decreased the conditioned responding evoked by the light (ED(50)=4.16 mg/kg). Neither nicotine nor amphetamine substituted for the caffeine feature. As a CS, caffeine (10 or 30 mg/kg, Experiments 2a and 2b, respectively) signaled intermittent access to sucrose--no light presentations. No sucrose or lights were presented on intermixed saline sessions. The caffeine CS, regardless of training dose, acquired the ability to evoke only a weak goal-tracking CR. The nature of this dissociation between caffeine as a drug feature and a CS is discussed within the context of past research finding a similar dissociation with amphetamine and chlordiazepoxide, but not with nicotine.     

Influence of sex and estrous cyclicity on conditioned cue-induced reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior in rats

Rationale Sex differences have been reported in physiological and behavioral responses to cocaine, but it is unclear whether sex differences exist in conditioned-cued relapse to cocaine seeking after prolonged abstinence. Furthermore, the role of estrous cyclicity in conditioned-cued relapse has not been investigated.Objective We assessed the influence of sex and estrous cyclicity on conditioned-cued reinstatement of drug-seeking behavior in Sprague–Dawley rats.Methods Rats were trained to self-administer intravenous cocaine (unconditioned stimulus, US; 0.25, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, or 1.0 mg/kg per infusion) paired with light+tone conditioned stimuli (CSs) and were subsequently tested for the ability of the CSs to reinstate extinguished cocaine seeking (i.e., nonreinforced lever responding).Results Females exhibited more responding on the cocaine-paired lever during self-administration and extinction than males. Subsequently, males exhibited equally robust conditioned-cued reinstatement of extinguished drug-seeking behavior independent of cocaine training dose. Males and females trained on 0.4–0.6 mg/kg cocaine reinstated to a similar extent. However, females trained on the lowest dose (0.25 mg/kg) exhibited less reinstatement than males, and the source of this effect was the absence of reinstatement in estrous females. In addition, independent of estrous state, females trained on the highest dose (1.0 mg/kg) exhibited less reinstatement than males.Conclusions While males and females are equally responsive to cocaine-paired CSs when the conditions for CS–US association are optimal, females appear to attribute less motivational significance to the CS when it presumably acquires weaker motivational salience because of (a) a low cocaine dose or (b) weaker CS–US contiguity due to the prolonged effects of a high cocaine dose.     

Nicotine serves as a feature-positive modulator of Pavlovian appetitive conditioning in rats

The present experiments examined whether a nicotine state could set the occasion for a pairing between visual cues and a rewarding outcome in rats. Following nicotine administration, presentation of a conditional stimulus (CS; light-on) was followed by brief access to a sucrose solution. When saline was administered, the same CS was presented but was not followed by any consequence. In Experiment 1, two groups assessed whether rats could acquire this Pavlovian feature-positive discrimination via different training procedures. An anticipatory food-seeking conditioned response (CR) developed during the CS on nicotine sessions but not on saline sessions in both groups. In Experiment 2, centrally acting antagonists of nicotinic acetylcholine and opiate receptors (mecamylamine and naloxone, respectively) dose-dependently blocked nicotine's control of the CR, whereas the peripherally acting nicotinic antagonist hexamethonium had no effect. Increasing or decreasing the interval between nicotine administration and testing also attenuated the CR. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that nicotine can occasion appetitive Pavlovian relations via its action at central nervous system cholinergic receptors.     

Nicotine serves as an effective reinforcer of intravenous drug-taking behavior in human cigarette smokers

Rationale Although numerous studies have documented that nicotine can function as an effective reinforcer of intravenous self-administration behavior in animals, it has not been clearly shown to maintain intravenous self-administration behavior above vehicle placebo levels in humans.Objectives To compare the reinforcing effectiveness of nicotine versus saline placebo in human research volunteers responding under fixed-ratio (FR) schedules of intravenous drug self-administration while systematically increasing response requirements.Methods Eight male cigarette smokers resided in an inpatient research unit. During 3-h sessions, intravenous injections of nicotine and saline were available concurrently and were contingent on responding (pulling a lever). Nicotine dose (0.75, 1.5, 3.0 mg/injection), time out (TO) value after each injection (1–20 min) and FR response requirement (10–1600) were varied in different subjects over consecutive sessions.Results Number of nicotine injections/session significantly decreased as dose/injection increased and the number of self-administered nicotine injections was significantly greater than the number of self-administered saline injections across conditions. When FR value was progressively increased over sessions, response rates for nicotine, but not saline, injections increased, with maximal rates at the highest FR values. Rates of responding and injections/session were markedly and significantly higher for nicotine than for saline at FR values of 200 and above. Subjects rated effects of nicotine as both significantly more positive and more negative than saline placebo, with positive ratings significantly higher than negative ratings.Conclusions Nicotine functioned as a prototypic drug of abuse, serving as an effective reinforcer of intravenous drug-taking behavior in human cigarette smokers. Subjects adjusted their responding to response requirements in a way that maintained relatively constant levels of nicotine injections per session.Abstracts of these experiments previously appeared in Pharmacologist 25:219, 1983, and Neurosci Lett 14(Suppl):140, 1983.     

Stimulus properties of nicotine, amphetamine, and chlordiazepoxide as positive features in a pavlovian appetitive discrimination task in rats.

Recent experiments from our laboratory have demonstrated that drug states can signal when environmental cues will be followed by rewarding outcomes (ie Pavlovian conditioning). However, little is known about the generality of this approach and whether it can be used for studying the pharmacological properties of drug states. Accordingly, the present experiments tested the pharmacological specificity of nicotine (0.4 mg/kg), amphetamine (1 mg/kg), and chlordiazepoxide (CDP, 5 mg/kg) in this Pavlovian drug discrimination procedure. Following drug administration, presentation of a conditional stimulus (CS) was followed by brief access to sucrose. When saline was administered, the same CS was presented but sucrose was withheld. In substitution tests, rats in each condition received varying doses of all training drugs and caffeine. Anticipatory food seeking developed during the CS on drug sessions but not on saline sessions for all drug features (ie drug state-specific conditional response (CR)). In generalization tests, this CR decreased as a function of decreases in the training dose. Median effective doses (ED50s) were calculated for nicotine (0.054 mg/kg), amphetamine (0.26 mg/kg), and CDP (2.48 mg/kg). No compound tested substituted for the CDP training drug. Partial substitution was evident between nicotine and amphetamine; CDP did not substitute for either of these drug features. Caffeine fully substituted for nicotine (ED50 = 15.45 mg/kg) and amphetamine (ED50 = 3.70 mg/kg), but not for CDP. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that drug states can occasion appetitive Pavlovian CRs in a pharmacologically specific manner.     

Nicotine induces conditioned place preferences over a large range of doses in rats

Rationale Conditioned place preference (CPP) procedures provide one measure of potential rewarding effects of abused drugs. Many attempts to induce CPP with nicotine have been unsuccessful.Objectives To assess the influence of nicotine dose and stimulus assignment procedure on development of nicotine-induced CPP.Methods Initial preferences for one side of a two-compartment apparatus were first determined in Sprague–Dawley rats. In subsequent conditioning trials, the compartment paired with nicotine was the initially preferred side for half of the rats, and the initially non-preferred side for the other half. Rats received either an injection of nicotine (0.01–2 mg/kg SC) before being placed in one compartment (three trials) or saline before being placed in the other compartment (three trials). Control rats had saline injections associated with both compartments. A final test trial with no injection assessed final place preference.Results Significant CPP were induced by 0.1–1.4 mg/kg doses of nicotine. Nicotine-induced CPP were only apparent when nicotine was paired with the initially non-preferred side. Moreover, a very high dose of nicotine (2 mg/kg) induced conditioned place aversion when paired with the initially preferred side of the apparatus.Conclusions Nicotine induced significant CPP across a wide range of doses, in accordance with its role as the primary addictive component of tobacco. Small preferences for one side of the apparatus played a major role in the development of nicotine-induced CPP. These findings suggest that biased procedures may be more suitable than unbiased procedures for evaluation of rewarding effects of nicotine using CPP paradigms.