Resection in chronic pancreatitis: anastomosis with the jejunum or with the stomach?

Even in centers where the first choice in the surgical treatment of chronic pancreatitis is a derivative procedure some selected patients require resection. The most popular solution of gastrointestinal reconstruction still seems to be pancreaticojejunostomy but, the review of the reported experiences, suggests a general trend towards anastomosis with the stomach as a recent policy. A reliable comparison between pancreaticogastrostomy and pancreaticojejunostomy is difficult because the reported series are seldom related to chronic pancreatitis patients only, but are reporting mixed date concerning mainly periampullary cancer. Moreover with only one exception no prospective randomised clinical trails are available; unfortunately the positive trend in favour of pancreaticogastrostomy reported in uncontrolled studies is not confirmed in the randomized setting. Also the comparison between the experiences achieved by the present authors working in centers with different approach to the pancreatic anastomosis does not show statistical significant difference for both morbidity and mortality. In conclusion nowadays the best confidence and experience with any of the two methods represents the basis of choice.     

Does the urorectal septum fuse with the cloacal membrane?

PURPOSE: Traditional theories of cloacal embryogenesis assume that the urorectal septum fuses with the cloacal membrane before the anal membrane disintegrates. However, recent observations in humans and other species raise doubt about this assumption. We determined whether urorectal septum fusion occurs in rats. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Rat embryos were harvested at specific times between days 11 and 16 of gestation. We evaluated the morphology, growth and relationship of the urorectal septum to the cloacal membrane on serial histological sections. RESULTS: The urorectal septum consistently fused with the cloacal membrane on day 15 of gestation before the cloacal membrane began to disintegrate. CONCLUSIONS: In rats the urorectal septum fuses with the cloacal membrane, after which the urogenital membrane and anal membrane disintegrate by a process of apoptosis.     

Insertion of the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway is more successful with the Flexi-Slip™ stylet than with the introducer

Purpose

The ProSeal? laryngeal mask airway (PLMA?) may be difficult to insert because of its large soft cuff, even when using a dedicated introducer tool. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether introduction of a stylet (Flexi-Slip?) in the drainage tube improved insertion characteristics compared with the standard introducer.

Methods

In this randomized controlled trial, 160 adults were allocated randomly to either the Introducer group (n = 80) or to the Flexi-Slip stylet group (n = 80). In the Introducer group, the PLMA was inserted with an introducer as described in the manufacturer’s instructions. In the Flexi-Slip stylet group, a Flexi-Slip stylet was inserted into the drainage tube of the PLMA and bent to form a near 90° angle at the junction of the cuff and the airway tube. The primary outcome measurement was the success rate at first attempt. Insertion time, visible blood staining, and complications were also noted.

Results

Success at first attempt was more frequent with the Flexi-Slip stylet than with the introducer (100% vs 86%, respectively; P = 0.001). Overall time (mean ± standard deviation) taken for successful placement was shorter with the Flexi-Slip stylet than with the introducer (19.9 ± 5.6 sec vs 28.4 ± 15.2 sec, respectively; P < 0.001). The incidences of blood staining and postoperative sore throat were lower in the Flexi-Slip stylet group than in the Introducer group (4% vs 15%, respectively; P = 0.015 and 8% vs 23%, respectively; P = 0.008).

Conclusion

Insertion of the PLMA with a Flexi-Slip stylet has a higher success rate at first attempt, requires less time, and results in fewer airway complications than the introducer technique.     

Does the femur roll-back with flexion?

MRI studies of the knee were performed at intervals between full extension and 120 degrees of flexion in six cadavers and also non-weight-bearing and weight-bearing in five volunteers. At each interval sagittal images were obtained through both compartments on which the position of the femoral condyle, identified by the centre of its posterior circular surface which is termed the flexion facet centre (FFC), and the point of closest approximation between the femoral and tibial subchondral plates, the contact point (CP), were identified relative to the posterior tibial cortex. The movements of the CP and FFC were essentially the same in the three groups but in all three the medial differed from the lateral compartment and the movement of the FFC differed from that of the CR Medially from 30 degrees to 120 degrees the FFC and CP coincided and did not move anteroposteriorly. From 30 degrees to 0 degrees the anteroposterior position of the FFC remained unchanged but the CP moved forwards by about 15 mm. Laterally, the FFC and the CP moved backwards together by about 15 mm from 20 degrees to 120 degrees. From 20 degrees to full extension both the FFC and CP moved forwards, but the latter moved more than the former. The differences between the movements of the FFC and the CP could be explained by the sagittal shapes of the bones, especially anteriorly. The term 'roll-back' can be applied to solid bodies, e.g. the condyles, but not to areas. The lateral femoral condyle does roll-back with flexion but the medial does not, i.e. the femur rotates externally around a medial centre. By contrast, both the medial and lateral contact points move back, roughly in parallel, from 0 degrees to 120 degrees but they cannot 'roll'. Femoral roll-back with flexion, usually imagined as backward rolling of both condyles, does not occur.     

Laparoscopic Italian Experience with the Lap-Band®

Background: An increasing number of surgeons with different levels of experience with laparoscopic surgery and open obesity surgery have started to perform laparoscopic implantation of the Lap-Band^?. Methods: An electronic patient data sheet was created and was mailed and e-mailed to all surgeons performing laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding (LASGB) in Italy. Patients were recruited since January 1996. Data on 1,265 Lap-Band System^? operated patients (258 M / 1,007 F; mean BMI 44.1, range 27.0-78.1; mean age 38, range 17-74 years) were collected from 23 surgeons performing this operation. Results: Intra-operative mortality was absent. Post-operative mortality was 0.55% (7 patients) for causes not specifically related to LASGB implantation. The laparotomic conversion rate was 1.7% (22 patients). LASGB related complications occured in 143 patients (11.3%). Pouch dilatation was diagnosed in 65 (5.2%), and 28 (2.2%) of these underwent re-operation. Band erosion was observed in 24 patients (1.9%). Port or connecting tube-port complications occurred in 54 patients (4.2%), 12 of whom required revision under general anesthesia. Follow-up was obtained at 6, 12, 18, 24, 36 and 48 months, and mean BMI was respectively 38.4, 35.1, 33.1, 30.2, 32.1 and 31.5. The percentage of patients observed at each follow-up was >60%. There was no intra-operative mortality and no complication-related mortality, with acceptable weight loss. Conclusion: The LASGB operation is safe and effective, and deserves wider use for treatment of morbid obesity.     

In with the new, out with the old? Comparison of two approaches for psoas compartment block

We compared the approaches of Winnie and Capdevila for psoas compartment block (PCB) performed by a single operator in terms of contralateral spread, lumbar plexus blockade, and postoperative analgesic efficacy. Sixty patients underwent PCB (0.4 mL/kg levobupivacaine 0.5%) and subsequent spinal anesthesia for primary joint arthroplasty (hip or knee) in a prospective, double-blind study. Patients were randomly allocated to undergo PCB by using the Capdevila (group C; n = 30) or a modified Winnie (group W; n = 30) approach. Contralateral spread and lumbar plexus blockade were assessed 15, 30, and 45 min after PCB. Contralateral spread (bilateral from T4 to S5) and femoral and lateral cutaneous nerve block were evaluated by sensory testing, and obturator motor block was assessed. Bilateral anesthesia occurred in 10 patients in group C and 12 patients in group W (P = 0.8). Blockade of the femoral, lateral cutaneous, and obturator nerves was 90%, 93%, and 80%, respectively, for group C and 93%, 97%, and 90%, respectively, for group W (P > 0.05). No differences were found in PCB procedure time, pain scores, 24-h morphine consumption, or time to first morphine analgesia.     

Evaluation of the treatment of clubfeet with the Diméglio score

Between January 1994 and November 1997, 17 children with 25 clubfeet were treated and evaluated. This group was divided into a group of only conservatively treated feet (group A, n=13) and a group of feet which had conservative treatment and complementary operative treatment (group B, n=12). Both groups were evaluated according to the Diméglio classification method in which the objective clinical evaluation is scored only. This was performed for the starting-point (at presentation until 2 weeks after birth), with the necessary information received from the patient's files where all the passive limitations were recorded in a standardized way and also for the end-point (at the time of the follow-up). After comparing these results to each other, all 25 feet had improved after treatment and the operative group had improved more than the conservative group, however the end result was equal, because the operated feet were more severely deformed before the treatment. After treatment, the results were considered acceptable in 92% of the feet, comparable to 93%, 75-85%, 88%, 77%, and 96% in other studies. Moreover, the forefoot adduction was the most common residual sign in the treated feet, confirmed by results in other studies. We conclude that the Diméglio method is an appropriate tool for the follow-up of clubfeet from birth to the end of treatment.     

Low conjunction of the cystic duct with the common bile duct: does it correlate with the formation of common bile duct stones?

Background This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) in detecting variants of low cystic duct conjunction, which can be a source of confusion during surgery when unrecognized. Methods All cases with both MRC and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) indicating suspected common bile duct stones between January 1999 and January 2004 were retrospectively reviewed by investigators blinded to the final diagnosis. Assessment with ERC was regarded as the gold standard. The aim was to find a low conjunction of the cystic duct with the bile duct. The sensitivity and specificity of MRC were calculated in comparison with those for ERC. The cystic junction radial orientation was defined as lateral (insertion diagonally from the right), medial (insertion into the left side of the common hepatic duct), or posteroanterior (overlap of the junction with the bile duct in the posteroanterior view). A spiral cystic duct and a long parallel course were evaluated separately. Results Low insertion of the cystic duct was found on ERC in 66 of 622 patients (11%; 28 men and 38 women; mean age, 64.5 years). The sensitivity and specificity of MRC for detecting low cystic entrance were 100% (90.4% on an intention-to-diagnose basis and 100%, respectively). In 11 patients (16.6%), the radial orientation of the cysticohepatic junction could not be defined with MRC. The rate of correct MRC delineation was 95% for lateral (n = 21), 77% for medial (n = 26), and 74% for posteroanterior (n = 19) insertion of the cystic duct. Conclusion The findings showed that MRC has good correlation with ERC with regard to the location and anatomic details of cystic duct insertion. Although this does not generate a separate indication for MRC before laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the anatomic information can be of additional use when MRC is clinically indicated in this setting.