Rheumatoid Forefoot Reconstruction: First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Fusion Combined with Weil’s Metatarsal Osteotomies of the Lesser Rays

This study evaluates the outcome of rheumatoid forefoot reconstruction with arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) combined with multiple Weil's metatarsal osteotomies (WMO) to the lesser rays. A retrospective study on 17 consecutive patients (26 feet) was performed with subjective, clinical, and radiological analysis. At an average follow-up of 26.2 months, patients rated the result in 88% of cases as excellent or good with 76% improvement in pain, 74% improvement in function, and 70% improvement in footwear. This corresponded with a high mean modified AOFAS score of 72/100 (34 to 90). First MTPJ arthrodesis union rate was 92%. Fourteen percent of lesser toes were aligned preoperatively compared to 86% at latest review. There was a 12% rate of recurrent metatarsalgia and or callosities. This combined procedure provides stabilization of the first ray, offloading the lesser metatarsals and preventing early recurrence of deformity. Preserving the lesser metatarsal head further widens the surgical options if revisional surgery is necessary in the future. ACFAS Level of Clinical Evidence: 4.     

A Retrospective Review of the Weil Metatarsal Osteotomy for Lesser Metatarsal Deformities: An Intermediate Follow-up Analysis

The purpose of this retrospective clinical study was to determine the clinical results of the Weil metatarsal osteotomy. There were 51 patients (89 procedures), consisting of 10 males and 41 females, with a mean 53.1 +/- 11.9 years. Patients were evaluated for subjective improvement on a scale from 0 to 10, and asked if they would repeat the procedure. They were evaluated functionally using the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society's lesser metatarsal rating scale, and assessed for toe purchase and range of motion. Thirty-nine point two percent of patients reported a complete resolution of pain (10/10 points), with 13.7% reporting a score of < or = 5/10. Eighty percent of the patients would repeat the procedure. The most common complication was toe elevation in 33% of patients. Joint range of motion was reduced in most cases. Thirty five patients experienced no pain at end range of motion, 6 related significant pain and 9 patients experienced some pain. Patients who underwent the procedure as a prophylactic measure along with a first ray procedure formed a significant subgroup (31%). These patients also scored well in comparison to the remainder of patients, with a mean subjective score of 8.4/10 as compared with 7.9/10 for the remainder of patients. The prophylactic group also demonstrated a median functional rating scale score of 90, versus 80 for the remainder of patients. These findings suggest that the Weil metatarsal osteotomy is a useful procedure for metatarsalgia and may also be useful in preventing lesser metatarsalgia in conjunction with first metatarsal surgery.     

Comparison of Combination Weil Metatarsal Osteotomy and Direct Plantar Plate Repair Versus Weil Metatarsal Osteotomy Alone for Forefoot Metatarsalgia

Although many surgeons believe that shortening osteotomies are appropriate in patients with metatarsalgia and long second metatarsals, there remains ambiguity regarding when to repair the injured plantar plate and when to leave it alone. We prospectively assessed consecutive adult subjects who underwent an isolated second Weil metatarsal osteotomy (WMO) or a WMO plus plantar plate repair (WMO + PPR) for sub–second metatarsophalangeal joint pain during a 3.5-year period at our practice. Eighty-six patients (86 feet: 21 WMO only and 65 WMO + PPR) with a mean age of 61 ± 11 years were followed for 1 year. Patients were assessed via use of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score and radiographic parabola/alignment of the operative digit preoperatively and postoperatively. Patients in the WMO + PPR group demonstrated significant improvements preoperatively to postoperatively in 4 of the 5 FAOS subscales (Pain, Other Symptoms, Sport and Recreation Function, and Ankle- and Foot-Related Quality of Life [QoL], all p < .05) and had higher QoL and Pain subscale scores at 1 year compared with those in the WMO-only group (QoL: 68.6 ± 26.7 versus 49.7 ± 28.5, respectively [p = .01]; Pain: 83.2 ± 14.5 versus 73.6 ± 19.9, respectively [p = .04]). The WMO + PPR group tended to have higher-grade tears on intraoperative inspection (median 3, range 0 to 4) compared with those in the WMO group (median 1, range 0 to 3). There were otherwise no group differences in preoperative or postoperative radiographic parabola, alignment of the second toe, or complication rates. Our findings suggest that when a shortening osteotomy is performed, imbricating/repairing and advancing the plantar plate may be valuable regardless of injury grade in the plate.     

Clinical Outcomes after Isolated Periarticular Osteotomies of the First Metatarsal for Hallux Rigidus: A Systematic Review

Isolated periarticular osteotomy of the first metatarsal has been proposed for treatment of hallux rigidus due to the perceived ability to “decompress” the first metatarsophalangeal joint through axial shortening, as well as plantar displacement of the first metatarsal head to correct purported elevation. Additionally, isolated periarticular osteotomy of the first metatarsal has been proposed for treatment of hallux rigidus because of the perceived safety and efficacy. Furthermore, it has been proposed that undergoing isolated periarticular osteotomy of the first metatarsal does not prevent the ability to perform revision surgery. The author undertook a systematic review of electronic databases and other relevant sources to identify material relating to the clinical outcomes and need for surgical revision after isolated periarticular osteotomy of the first metatarsal for hallux rigidus. Information from peer-reviewed journals, as well as from non-peer–reviewed publications, abstracts and posters, and unpublished works, was also considered. In an effort to procure the highest quality studies available, studies were eligible for inclusion only if they involved consecutively enrolled patients undergoing isolated periarticular osteotomy of the first metatarsal for hallux rigidus, involved a prospective study design, included some form of objective and subjective data analysis, evaluated patients at a mean follow-up ≥12 months’ duration, and included details of complications requiring surgical intervention. Four studies involving 93 isolated periarticular osteotomies of the first metatarsal followed up for a weighted mean of 18.6 months were identified that met the inclusion criteria. Peak dorsiflexion range of motion of the first metatarsophalangeal joint for the entire cohort of 93 patients increased 10.4°. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Hallux Metatarsophalangeal-Interphalangeal Scoring Scale for the entire cohort of 93 patients increased 39 points from a weighted mean of 47.2 preoperatively to 86.2 postoperatively. For the two studies that included it, complete satisfaction or satisfaction with reservations was reported in only 55/75 (73.3%) patients, with the remainder being dissatisfied. A total of 21 (22.6%) procedures underwent surgical revision in the form of hardware removal (n = 8), lesser metatarsal surgery for intractable postoperative metatarsalgia (n = 7), no mention of revision procedure (n = 3), Keller resection arthroplasty (n = 2), and treatment of infection with revision of non-union (n = 1). Two studies specified the grade of hallux rigidus that underwent revision surgery after isolated periarticular osteotomy of the first metatarsal as follows: grade I, 16.7% (n = 3/18) and grade II, 30.5% (n = 18/59). Finally, a total of 30.5% (n = 18/59) of patients developed postoperative metatarsalgia or stress fracture. Additional prospective studies involving validated subjective and objective outcome measurement tools with computerized gait analysis and long-term follow-up after isolated periarticular osteotomy of the first metatarsal for the various grades of hallux rigidus, as well as with comparison with isolated cheilectomy and Valenti arthroplasty, would be beneficial. Based on the high incidence of complications until these studies can be completed, routine use of isolated periarticular osteotomy of the first metatarsal for hallux rigidus should be performed with caution or not at all.     

Conservation of Metatarsal Heads in Surgery of Rheumatoid Arthritis of the Forefoot

A new method of forefoot reconstruction for rheumatoid arthritis in 79 patients is described in which the metatarsal heads are preserved. the first metatarsophalangeal joint is fused and the bases of the proximal phalanges of only those rays involved with disease excised together with cysts and synovium. Post-operatively traction is used to maintain the length of the operated lateral toes. the results in 71 patients followed for 3-5 years after operation are reported. Excellent pain relief, improved stability and feet of normal length are achieved.     

Conservation of Metatarsal Heads in Surgery of Rheumatoid Arthritis of the Forefoot

A new method of forefoot reconstruction for rheumatoid arthritis in 79 patients is described in which the metatarsal heads are preserved. the first metatarsophalangeal joint is fused and the bases of the proximal phalanges of only those rays involved with disease excised together with cysts and synovium. Post-operatively traction is used to maintain the length of the operated lateral toes. the results in 71 patients followed for 3-5 years after operation are reported. Excellent pain relief, improved stability and feet of normal length are achieved.     

Fifth Metatarsal Osteotomies for Treatment of Bunionette Deformity: A Meta-Analysis of Angle Correction and Clinical Condition

We assessed which type of osteotomy would be most suited for correcting an increased fourth to fifth intermetatarsal angle (IMA) and metatarsophalangeal angle (MPA) and would have the best results regarding the clinical condition and satisfaction. The study design was a systematic review and meta-analysis. The main outcome measures were the IMA, MPA, and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Lesser Metatarsophalangeal–Interphalangeal scale and satisfaction scores. A systematic search was performed in Medline, Embase, Cochrane, SPORTdiscus, and CINAHL up to September 2016. Prospective and retrospective studies that had evaluated the outcomes of fifth metatarsal osteotomies to correct a bunionette deformity at all patient ages were included. The outcomes were determined from clinical or radiographic evaluations. The search yielded 28 studies suitable for inclusion in our meta-analysis. All groups of osteotomies achieved significant IMA changes, with proximal osteotomies resulting in significantly greater changes than diaphyseal or distal osteotomies. The overall effect of osteotomies on the MPA was of a significant reduction. Proximal and diaphyseal osteotomies both resulted in significant differences in MPA correction compared with distal osteotomies. The incidence of major complications was the least in the distal osteotomy group. The overall mean success rate of bunionette surgery was 93%. The patients were most satisfied with proximal osteotomies, followed by distal and diaphyseal osteotomies (100% and 92%, respectively). In conclusion, every type of osteotomy has the capability of significantly reducing the fourth to fifth IMA and MPA. The fewest complications occurred with distal osteotomies, and the greatest satisfaction score was achieved with proximal osteotomies. However, only 1 study evaluated these results for proximal osteotomies. Distal osteotomies resulted in a high satisfaction rate and were the most represented osteotomy in our meta-analysis. Thus, when major IMA and MPA reduction is not required, the distal osteotomy could be the treatment of choice owing to its low complication rate.     

Subjective and Objective Outcomes of Surgery for Rheumatoid Forefoot Deformities Under the Current Treatment Paradigm

We investigated the clinical outcomes of surgical procedures for the treatment of forefoot deformities in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Twenty feet in 16 women (mean age 62.1 years) underwent corrective osteotomy of the first metatarsal bone with shortening oblique osteotomy of the lesser metatarsophalangeal joints (joint-preservation group), while 13 feet in 12 women (mean age 67.4 years) underwent arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint with resection arthroplasty of the lesser metatarsophalangeal joints (joint-sacrifice group); mean follow-up for each group was 25.8 and 23.8 months, respectively. The mean total Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot (JSSF) scale improved significantly from 64.2 to 89.2 in the joint-preservation group (p < .001), and from 54.2 to 74.2 in the joint-sacrifice group (p = .003). In the joint-preservation group, the postoperative range of motion (ROM) of the joint, walking ability, and activities of daily living scores of the JSSF scale were significantly higher than those in the joint-sacrifice group (p = .001, p = .001, and p = .019, respectively). There were no differences in the subscale scores of the self-administered foot evaluation questionnaire between 2 groups either pre- or postoperatively. No differences in the postoperative complications were found between 2 groups. Although the joint-sacrificing procedure resulted in lower objective outcomes than the joint-preserving procedure regarding the ROM of the joint, the walking ability, and the level of activities of daily living, both procedures resulted in similar treatment outcomes when evaluated by the subjective measures.     

Percutaneous Osteotomies in Hallux Valgus: A Systematic Review

Percutaneous and minimally invasive surgery is one of the greatest advances in the operating field of orthopedic since the late 1990s. The potential advantages include a shorter operative time, quicker recovery, and reduced hospital stay compared with traditional open surgery. However, scientific validation of the safety and efficacy of hallux valgus (HV) percutaneous surgery remains inconclusive. The objective of the present study was to systematically review the published data and clinical evidence for percutaneous HV surgery, evaluate the scientific method of the reports, and clarify the indications, safety, efficacy, and potential risks of these surgical techniques. Two reviewers independently identified the studies using a PubMed search, with the keywords “hallux valgus,” “osteotomy,” “minimally invasive,” and “percutaneous.” Quality assessment was performed using the Coleman methodology scale, and each study was assigned a level of evidence and grade of recommendation. Eighteen studies were included and reported a total of 1534 procedures for percutaneous HV surgery on 1397 patients. Of the 18 studies, 14 (77.8%) were level IV, 2 (11.1%) were level III, and 2 (11.1%) were level II. Overall, the average angle correction of the HV deformity improved postoperatively. Regarding the complications, although some investigators revealed no major complications, others described deformity recurrence in 7.8%, stiffness of the first metatarsophalangeal joint in 9.8%, malunion in 4% to 8.7%, and infection rates ranging from 1.9% to 14.3%. The main indication for percutaneous HV surgery is the correction of mild deformities. The complication rate was elevated even in experienced surgeons. In conclusion, future research in percutaneous techniques should include adequately sized randomized control trials, standardization of treatment protocols, and the use of validated tools for the measurement of clinical outcomes.     

The Mitchell and Scarf Osteotomies for Hallux Valgus Correction: A Retrospective, Comparative Analysis Using Plantar Pressures

A retrospective analysis was performed to describe the effects of Mitchell and Scarf osteotomies on plantar pressure distribution and their relevance to the clinical outcome. This study evaluated 28 patients who underwent operations for moderate to severe hallux valgus deformities over a period of 3 years at 2 different centers. Twenty-two Mitchell and 22 Scarf osteotomies were performed on 28 patients with a mean follow-up of 23 months (13-62 months). The average postoperative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scores after Mitchell and Scarf osteotomies were 74 and 84, respectively. A control group of 15 individuals with 20 healthy feet were included for comparison. The plantar pressures were documented with the Musgrave footplate. The pressure distributions under the first metatarsal head were within normal limits in both study groups compared with the control group (P = .77). After Mitchell osteotomies, deficient load bearing was noted under the hallux (P = .007), coupled with overloading of the second and third metatarsal heads (P = .01). But after the Scarf procedures, increased weight bearing was noted at the heel (P = .04) and midfoot (P = .09), with better load distribution under the hallux. However, it was not comparable with the control group. Correlation of American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scores and pressure variables demonstrated a significant positive correlation with hallux loading (P = .001). This study demonstrates that adequate hallux loading is imperative for a better outcome of the procedure. Mitchell and Scarf osteotomies do not restore the load-bearing function of the foot to normal, whereas hallux loading plays an important role for a better outcome of the procedure.     

Effectiveness of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis Versus Arthroplasty for Rheumatoid Forefoot Deformity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies

To compare the clinical outcomes of resection arthroplasty of metatarsals 2-5 with either first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis or arthroplasty for rheumatoid forefoot deformity treatment. Comparative studies on the clinical effects of resection arthroplasty of metatarsals 2-5 with either first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis or arthroplasty for the treatment of rheumatoid forefoot deformity were systematically reviewed and a meta-analysis conducted. A total of 337 patients (459 feet) with rheumatoid forefoot deformity from 6 comparative studies were included, with the mean follow-up times ranging from 25 to 80 months in the arthrodesis group and 35 to 102 months in the arthroplasty group. Postoperative pain, satisfaction, hallux valgus angle, the 1^st –2^nd intermetatarsal angle, adverse events mainly including non-union and the reoperation rate, and pedobarographic data were reported. In the pooled analysis, there were no significant pain score differences between 1^st metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis and arthroplasty groups (SMD = 0.04, p = .734; I² = 43.7%, p = .149), but the hallux valgus angle and the 1^st –2^nd intermetatarsal angle showed significant differences between these 2 groups (For hallux valgus angle, SMD = -0.439, p = .002; I² = 96.6%, p = .000; for 1^st –2^nd intermetatarsal angle, SMD = -0.569, p = .000; I² = 98.2%, p = .000). The rate of non-union varied from 0% to 26% in the arthrodesis group. The reoperation rate varied from 3% to 9.6% in the arthrodesis group and from 4% to 11.6% in the arthroplasty group. A comparison of the procedures showed that first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis with resection arthroplasty of the lesser rays produced similar postoperative pain relief and better maintenance of the hallux valgus angle and the 1^st –2^nd intermetatarsal angle for rheumatoid forefoot deformity. However, the results should be interpreted with caution due to the high heterogeneity and relatively low quality of the reviewed articles.     

Fusion of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint and Second to Fifth Metatarsal Head Resection for Rheumatoid Forefoot Deformity

The goals of the present study were to evaluate the mid-term results of first metatarsophalangeal joint fusion combined with second to fifth metatarsal head resection in rheumatoid forefoot deformity and identify the prognostic factors. The inclusion criteria were 2010 American College of Rheumatology and/or European League Against Rheumatism criteria for rheumatoid arthritis; symptomatic forefoot deformity; first metatarsophalangeal joint fusion and second to fifth metatarsal head resection; and a minimum of 4 years of follow-up data available. The patients were evaluated using the Disease Activity Score 28 for rheumatoid arthritis, Health Assessment Questionnaire for Rheumatoid Arthritis, Foot Function Index, forefoot American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scale, and weightbearing radiographs. Different pre-, intra-, and postoperative variables were investigated to identify the prognostic factors. Sixty-two patients (89 feet) with a mean age of 60.8°± 9.4 years and 85.5°± 22.4 months of follow-up data were included. The preoperative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scale score was 33.4 ± 16 points and improved significantly (p < .001) after surgery (mean 82.9 ± 11.7 points). The mean Foot Function Index improved significantly (p < .001) from 131.6 ± 37.4 to 77.4 ± 46.3 points at the last follow-up visit. Only the revision surgery variable was significantly (p = .02) related to poor outcomes. Revision was necessary in 8 feet (9%). This procedure produced satisfactory results. Poor outcomes were significantly related to the necessity for revision surgery for nonunion, malunion, inadequate metatarsal resection, and painful hardware.     

A Systematic Review of Angular Deformities in Charcot Neuroarthropathy

Charcot neuroarthropathy of the foot and ankle is associated with periarticular deformities and progressive radiographic changes. There have been studies analyzing the radiographic angulations and deformity progression in Charcot neuroarthropathy deformity. The aim of this paper is to provide systematic review of studies that evaluate foot and ankle radiographic parameters in patients with Charcot neuroarthropathy. A multidatabase search including, medline, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, Clinicaltrials.gov and reference lists of included studies, was performed from 1980 to 2020. A total of 7 articles were included that analyzed radiographic angulations in Charcot neuroarthropathy deformity. The articles could be categorized into nonoperative angulation measurements, and pre- versus postoperative angulation measurements. The presence of ulcerations and the severity of the Charcot neuroarthropathy deformity were found to result from predominantly sagittal plane deformity. The deformity initiates with medial column collapse and progresses to continual lateral column collapse. Surgical intervention resulting in immediate postoperative improvement in angular measurements, however, without beaming of both the medial and lateral column, there was recurrence of the lateral column deformity. This systematic review of articles analyzing angular deformities in Charcot neuroarthropathy patients, demonstrates the progressive sagittal plane breakdown patterns of Charcot as well as the benefits of surgical intervention.     

Midterm Results of Resection Arthroplasty for Forefoot Deformities in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and the Risk Factors Associated with Patient Dissatisfaction

We investigated the midterm results of resection arthroplasty of all 5 metatarsal heads in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and forefoot deformity and analyzed the factors that affect patient satisfaction levels. Of 64 patients (1 male, 63 females), 107 feet were treated with resection arthroplasty for forefoot deformity at our hospital from January 1992 to December 2005. The mean follow-up period was 5.8 ± 3.1 years, with all patients having at least 1 year of follow-up. Of the 64 patients, 75% were satisfied with the surgery. The mean score for the postoperative Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot lesser metatarsophalangeal-interphalangeal scale was 75.0 ± 15.8 points. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that patient-reported dissatisfaction was significantly associated with the recurrence of hammer toe deformity (odds ratio 2.66, 95% confidence interval 1.07 to 6.97), shortening of the resection arthroplasty space (odds ratio 0.85 for a 1-unit increase, 95% confidence interval 0.74 to 0.96), and the recurrence of hallux valgus (odds ratio 1.04 for a 1-unit increase, 95% confidence interval 1.00 to 1.09) during the postoperative period. From our results, interventions to prevent recurrence of hammer toe deformity, especially in toes with preoperative metatarsophalangeal joint dislocations, have been shown to be important in preventing complications and patient dissatisfaction after resection arthroplasty.     

Scarf and Weil osteotomies for correction of rheumatoid forefoot deformities: A review of 20 cases

The forefoot is commonly affected in rheumatoid arthritis. Little has been written of the results of metatarsophalangeal joint preservation in rheumatoid arthritis. We describe the results of the Scarf and Weil osteotomy for correction of forefoot deformities in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Between 1996 and 1999, 17 patients (20 feet) underwent a Scarf osteotomy for their hallux valgus deformity and in 17 feet a Weil osteotomy of the lesser metatarsophalangeal joints. Radiographic examination was performed preoperatively and at a mean follow up of 65 months. A questionnaire was used at a minimum follow up of 6 years. The hallux valgus angle improved from 41° to 28° at follow up. The majority of the patients (79%) were satisfied with the result during follow-up. We found no wound infections, neuralgia or osteonecrosis of the first metatarsal. In three patients, a fusion of the first MTP joint was performed at follow up.In conclusion, the Scarf and Weil osteotomy is a useful method for MTP joint preserving surgery in rheumatoid forefoot deformities without severe impairment of the MTP joints.     

A Systematic Approach to the Surgical Correction of Combined Hallux Valgus and Metatarsus Adductus Deformities

The presence of metatarsus adductus (MTA) adds complexity to the diagnosis and treatment of hallux valgus (HV). Identification and careful analysis of these combined deformities is of paramount importance. The inability to completely correct HV and an increased incidence of recurrence has been established when MTA deformity is present. We present an option for correction of the combined deformities with multiplanar angular correction arthrodesis of the first, second, and third tarsometatarsal (TMT) joints.