Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide as primary treatment for diffuse diabetic macular edema: a prospective noncomparative interventional case series

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of one intravitreal injection of 25 mg of triamcinolone acetonide as primary treatment for diffuse diabetic macular edema. METHODS: Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection was performed in 30 eyes with previously untreated diabetic macular edema. The main outcome measures were logMAR visual acuity (VA) and central macular thickness (CMT) at 1, 3, and 6 months. A secondary outcome was intraocular pressure progression. RESULTS: Visual acuity results for 30 eyes that had a follow-up of at least 6 months are presented. Twenty of them were followed up to 10.1+/-2.38 months. Preoperatively, VA was 0.54+/-0.27. At 1, 3, and 6 months follow-up, VA was 0.44+/-0.29 (p=0.001), 0.43+/-0.28 (p=0.001), and 0.45+/-0.29 (p=0.006), respectively. Preoperatively, CMT was 417.3+/-143.5 microm. At 1, 3, and 6 months follow-up, CMT was 277.3 +74.0 microm (p<0.0001), 279.6+/-94.4 microm (p<0.0001), and 297.07+/-114.87 microm (p=0.002), respectively. For the 20 eyes with a follow-up of 10.1+/-2.38 months, VA was 0.5+/-0.25 and 0.50+/-0.32 at baseline and at the last follow-up visit, respectively (p>0.05). Preoperatively, intraocular pressure (IOP) was 15.13+/-1.48 mmHg. IOP was 18.26+/-2.71 mmHg, 20.07+/-4.27 mmHg, and 20.4+/-6.18 mmHg, at 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively (p<0.0001). Four eyes underwent uncomplicated filtrating surgery for intractable glaucoma. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal triamcinolone as primary treatment effectively increases VA and reduces CMT due to diffuse diabetic macular edema. Longer follow-up and randomized clinical trial are warranted. Safety results highlight the need to further study the relationship between triamcinolone and intraocular pressure.     

Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide treatment of macular edema associated with central retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE: To evaluate treatment of macular edema associated with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) using intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide. METHODS: Retrospective review of data for 29 eyes of 29 patients with CRVO and macular edema treated with intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide. Initial visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and history of glaucoma were recorded. Final visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and adverse events were recorded during the treatment period. RESULTS: Twenty-nine eyes were treated with intravitreal injection. The mean follow-up was 348 days. The median initial Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study visual acuity was 20/250 (median logMAR, 1.1). The median visual acuity 3 months after injection was 20/125 (median logMAR, 0.8). This difference was statistically significant. The median final visual acuity was 20/250 (median logMAR, 1.1). This difference in visual acuity was not statistically significant. Elevated intraocular pressure, excluding that related to neovascularization, occurred in 5 of 22 patients. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients who received multiple injections had better outcomes. CONCLUSION: Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide may improve vision transiently but does not appear to result in a sustained visual acuity benefit for patients with macular edema associated with CRVO. Repeated injections may be necessary. The risk of glaucoma is significant, and additional study is required to further characterize this and other risks.     

Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection as primary treatment for diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of intravitreal triamcinolone injection on the course of diabetic macular edema. METHODS: Forty-eight eyes of 48 diabetic patients were treated with 8 mg of intravitreal triamcinolone injection as the primary therapy for diabetic macular edema. The main outcome measures included best-corrected visual acuity, fundus fluorescein angio- graphy, macular edema map values of Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph II (HRT II), and intraocular pressures before and after intravitreal injection. RESULTS: The visual acuity increased in 41 of 48 eyes (85.4%) during a mean follow-up time of 7.5 months. The mean baseline best-corrected logMAR (logarithm of minimal angle of resolution) value for visual acuities of the patients before intravitreal triamcinolone injection was 1.17+/-0.20. After treatment, it was 0.85+/-0.29 at 1 month, 0.73+/-0.30 at 3 months, and 0.74+/-0.31 at 6 months, and the differences were significant when compared with baseline values (for each, p<0.001). The mean edema map values significantly decreased by 36% at the 6-month examinations when compared with preinjection values (p<0.001). Average intraocular pressure rose 24.3%, 29.1%, and 11.8% from baseline at the 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up intervals. Intraocular pressure elevation exceeding 21 mmHg was observed in 8 of 48 eyes (16.6%), but was controlled with topical antiglaucomatous medications in all eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal triamcinolone application provides significant improvement in visual acuity of diabetic patients and clinical course of macular edema, and may therefore be a promising approach in the primary treatment of diabetic macular edema.     

Duration of the effect of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide as treatment for diffuse diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE: To evaluate the duration of the effect of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide on visual acuity in patients with diffuse diabetic macular edema. DESIGN: Clinical interventional case series. METHODS: Subjects were 31 patients (38 eyes) with diffuse diabetic macular edema who received an intravitreal injection of 20- to 25-mg triamcinolone acetonide. Mean follow-up time was 13.2 +/- 6.0 months (6.03-25.2 months). RESULTS: Visual acuity and intraocular pressure began to increase significantly (P =.003) within the first week, reaching a plateaulike maximum at 1 to 7 months postinjection, returning to baseline values 8 to 9 months postinjection. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of an intravitreal injection of approximately 20- to 25-mg triamcinolone acetonide in patients with diffuse diabetic macular edema lasts approximately 7 to 8 months. This information may be helpful in determining the optimal dosage of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for the treatment of diffuse diabetic macular edema.     

Inter-eye difference in diabetic macular edema after unilateral intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide

PURPOSE: To report on visual outcome of patients receiving intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for treatment of diffuse diabetic macular edema. DESIGN: Prospective, comparative clinical interventional study. METHODS: Setting: Institutional. patient population: The study included 25 consecutive patients (50 eyes) with bilateral diabetic macular edema. Intervention procedure: Unilateral intravitreal injection of about 20 mg triamcinolone acetonide into the eye (study group) more severely affected by diabetic maculopathy. The contralateral eyes served as control group. Mean follow-up was 7.1 +/- 4.1 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Visual acuity, intraocular pressure. RESULTS: In the study group, visual acuity increased significantly (P < or = .001) by 3.0 +/- 2.6 Snellen lines to a peak at two to six months after the injection, and decreased significantly (P = .001) towards the end of follow up. At the end of follow-up, visual acuity was higher, not significantly (P = .18) higher, than at baseline. An increase in visual acuity was found in 23 eyes (92%). In the control group, differences between visual acuity at baseline and at any of the re-examinations during follow-up were not significant (P > .10). In an intra-individual inter-eye comparison, gain in visual acuity was significantly (P < .05) higher in the injected eyes, for the measurements obtained up to four months after injection. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide may temporarily increase visual acuity in eyes with diabetic macular edema.     

Prospective evaluation of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection in macular edema associated with retinal vascular disorders

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide on visual acuity and macular thickness using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in macular edema associated with various retinal vascular disorders. METHODS: This prospective nonrandomized clinical interventional study included 81 eyes (76 patients) comprised of Group I, 57 eyes (51 patients) with diabetic macular edema; Group II, 10 eyes (10 patients) with branch retinal vein occlusion; and Group III, 13 eyes (13 patients) with central retinal vein occlusion. All eyes received an intravitreal injection of 4 mg triamcinolone acetonide (with the solvent) in the operation theater under sterile conditions. RESULTS: Mean preinjection central macular thickness was 531.84+/-132 microm in Group I, 458.4+/-149 microm in Group II, and 750.81+/-148 microm in Group III. All groups showed a statistically significant decrease in mean central macular thickness at 1 month (300.7+/-119 microm in Group I, 218.2+/-99 microm in Group II, and 210.5 +/-56 microm in Group III) and 3 months (253.19+/-109 microm in Group I, 187+/-47 microm in Group II, and 182+/-50 microm in Group III) after injection (p < 0.05). Mean follow-up was 22+/-2.4 weeks. Mean visual acuity increased in all three groups (preoperative visual acuity in Group I, 1.2+/-0.4 logMAR units; Group II, 1.24+/-0.5 logMAR units; Group III, 1.1+/-0.4 logMAR units; 1 month postinjection in Group I, 0.88+/-0.3 logMAR units; Group II, 0.67+/-0.3 logMAR units; Group III, 0.86+/-0.4 logMAR units; 3 months postinjection in Group I, 0.84+/-0.4 logMAR units; Group II, 0.59+/-0.3 logMAR units; Group III, 0.82+/-0.5 logMAR units) (p < 0.05). Forty-one eyes completed 6 months and 20 eyes completed 9 months follow-up. Twelve of 20 (41%) eyes in Group I, 2/6 (33%) eyes in Group II, 3/6 (50%) eyes in Group III, and 8/15 (53%) eyes in Group I, 1/3 (33%) eyes in Group II, and 2/2 (100%) eyes in Group III developed recurrence of macular edema with worsening of visual acuity at 6 and 9 months, respectively. Thirty-three (40.7%) eyes developed IOP elevation (at least one reading > 24 mmHg). One eye developed infective endophthalmitis. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide may be considered as an effective treatment for reducing macular thickening due to diffuse diabetic macular edema, venous occlusion associated macular edema, and may result in increase in visual acuity at least in the short term. Further follow-up and analysis is required to demonstrate its long-term efficacy.     

Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for diffuse diabetic macular oedema: 6-month results of a prospective controlled trial

PURPOSE: To evaluate prospectively the efficacy and safety of one intravitreal injection of 4 mg triamcinolone acetonide for refractory diffuse diabetic macular edema. METHODS: Seventeen patients with bilateral diabetic macular edema unresponsive to laser photocoagulation. In all patients, one eye was injected, and the other served as a control. The intervention consisted in intravitreal injection of 4 mg triamcinolone acetonide. The main outcome measure was central macular thickness (CMT) at 4, 12 and 24 weeks, measured by Optical Coherence Tomography. Secondary outcomes were Early Treatment Diabetic Rentinopathy Study (ETDRS) scores, intraocular pressure and cataract PROGRESSION. RESULTS: Before injection, mean +/- SD CMT was 566.4 +/- 182.4 mum in injected eyes. Four, 12, and 24 weeks after injection, it was 228.4 +/- 47.5 mum, 210.9 +/- 87.2 mum and 358.5 +/- 160.5 mum respectively. CMT was significantly lower in injected eyes vs. control eyes except 24 weeks after injection because of a recurrence of macular edema in 9/17 injected eyes. Mean +/- SD gain in ETDRS score was significantly better in injected eyes vs. control eyes 4, 12 and 24 weeks after TA injection. In 9 of the 17 injected eyes, intraocular pressure exceeded 24 mmHg and was controlled by topical medication. CONCLUSION: In the short-term, intravitreal injection of triamcinolone effectively reduces macular thickening due to diffuse diabetic macular edema and improves visual acuity in most cases. The long-term effect of this treatment and predictive factors of visual recovery remain to be elucidated.     

Follow-up after intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE: To report on the follow-up of patients who received an intravitreal high-dosage injection of triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) as treatment of diffuse diabetic macular edema. METHODS: The clinical interventional case-series study included 109 eyes (90 patients) with diffuse diabetic macular edema who consecutively received an IVTA of about 20 mg. Mean follow-up was 11.2 +/- 6.2 months. RESULTS: Visual acuity improved significantly (p<0.001) from 0.89 +/- 0.33 logMAR to a best minimum of 0.65 +/- 0.35 logMAR. An increase in best visual acuity by at least 1 Snellen line, 2 lines, and 3 lines was found in 91 (83%) eyes, 68 (62%) eyes, and 45 (41%) eyes, respectively. Differences in visual acuity between baseline and follow-up examinations were significant for measurements performed at 1 month (p<0.001), 2 months (p<0.001), 3 months (p<0.001), and at 6 months (p=0.001) after the injection. At 9 months after the injection, mean visual acuity regressed significantly so that visual acuity at 9 months (p=0.83) and at 12 months after the injection (p=0.58) compared with baseline values did not differ significantly. Forty-seven (43%) eyes developed a rise in intraocular pressure (pressure >21 mmHg) for 6 to 8 months after the injection. No other severe complications were detected. CONCLUSIONS: The duration of a visual acuity increase and intraocular pressure rise after high-dosage IVTA in diffuse diabetic macular edema is about 6 to 8 months. Compared with data in the literature, the high-dosage IVTA may not have a markedly higher profile of side effects than low-dosage IVTA.     

Intravitreal triamcinolone injection for chronic diffuse diabetic macular oedema

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of intravitreal triamcinolone in chronic diffuse diabetic macular oedema. METHODS: This prospective, interventional consecutive case series study consisted of 59 eyes (36 patients) with chronic diffuse diabetic macular oedema, which received an intravitreal injection of 4 mg triamcinolone acetonide. The results were evaluated by clinical examination and fluorescein angiography. Potential complications such as a rise in intraocular pressure, cataract progression and endophthalmitis were recorded. RESULTS: All patients completed at least 6 months follow up. The mean visual acuity improved significantly from 0.17 +/- 3.4 to a maximum of 0.30 +/- 3.3 at the third postinjection month (P < 0.01). Mean improvements in visual acuity measured were 2.15 +/- 1.66, 2.42 +/- 2.66, 1.13 +/- 2.74, 0.96 +/- 2.01 and 0.08 +/- 2.34 lines at the 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months follow-up intervals, respectively. In all eyes in fluorescein angiography, macular oedema was resolved (63%) or decreased (37%) during the follow up. However, the macular oedema reached the pretreatment level in 29 (49%) of the eyes at 6 months and 15 of 21 eyes (71%) at 9 months after injection. Intraocular pressure exceeded 21 mmHg in 10 eyes, which were controlled by topical medication. Four eyes showed cataract progression. Endophthalmitis was not observed in any of the eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal injection of 4 mg triamcinolone acetonide appears to be an effective and relatively safe therapeutic method for diffuse diabetic macular oedema. Further studies are warranted to assess the long-term efficacy, safety and the need for reinjection.     

Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide: valuation of retinal thickness changes measured by optical coherence tomography in diffuse diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE: The authors studied the efficacy of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide in a case series of patients with diffuse diabetic macular edema without evidence of vitreous-macular traction refractory to laser photocoagulation. METHODS: Six eyes with clinically diffuse diabetic macular edema that failed to respond to at least two previous sessions of laser photocoagulation were included. The mean age of selected patients was 72.5+/-13.8 years, with a preoperative best-corrected visual acuity reduced to 1.48+/-0.18 logMar and a mean baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) of 15.17+/-2.64 mmHg. The authors also studied macular thickness measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT 2000 scanner, Humphrey Instruments, San Leandro, CA) - in the preoperative period it was 640.8+/-171.1 microm - and the fluorangiographic (Heidelberg Retina Angiograph, Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) patterns, which showed pooling in tardy phases and leakage. Mean follow-up was 4 months. RESULTS: In each patient the authors observed a significant improvement, both functionally and anatomically. Mean best-corrected visual acuity increased in the postoperative period to 0.94+/-0.53 logMar. No patient showed decline of visual acuity at the end of follow-up. Base line macular thickness was reduced in the postoperative period to 312.2+/-157.65 microm measured by OCT and fluorangiographic patterns showed a reduction of pooling and of leakage. The most common complications described in the literature were not observed and the increase of mean IOP in the postoperative period to 18.76+/-5.72 mmHg was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide may decrease macular edema and improve visual acuity in eyes with diffuse diabetic macular edema.     

Intravitreal injection of crystalline triamcinolone acetonide in the treatment of diffuse diabetic macular oedema

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the clinical outcome of an intravitreal injection of crystalline triamcinolone acetonide as treatment of clinically significant diffuse diabetic macular oedema. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 8 patients (10 eyes) who received an intravitreal injection of 25 mg crystalline triamcinolone acetonide as treatment of clinically significant diffuse diabetic macular oedema follow-up time was 3.48 +/- 3.25 months (mean +/- SD). The study group was compared with a control group of 16 patients with diffuse diabetic macular oedema who underwent grid laser coagulation of the macular region. RESULTS: In the study group, visual acuity increased significantly (p = 0.03) from 0.11 +/- 0.09 at baseline of the study to a maximum of 0.19 +/- 0.13 during the follow-up period. Six (85.7 %) of the seven eyes with a follow-up period of more than 4 weeks gained in visual acuity. Towards the end of the follow-up period, the triamcinolone acetonide crystals completely resolved and visual acuity decreased to 0.15 +/- 0.11, which was higher, but not significantly (p = 0.14) higher than the baseline value. Visual acuity was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in the study group than in the control group for the examinations obtained up to 12 weeks after the injection. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal injection of 25 mg crystalline triamcinolone acetonide may be beneficial for temporarily increasing visual acuity in patients with clinically significant diffuse diabetic macular oedema.     

Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for pseudophakic cystoid macular edema

PURPOSE: To report the clinical outcome of patients undergoing intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide as treatment of long-standing cystoid macular edema after phacoemulsification. DESIGN: Prospective clinical interventional cases series studies. METHODS: The study included five patients suffering from cystoid macular edema after cataract surgery. They received an intravitreal injection of 25-mg crystalline triamcinolone acetonide transconjunctivally with topical anesthesia. RESULTS: In the follow-up period of 6.6 +/- 4.1 months, visual acuity increased from 0.26 +/- 0.13 to a mean maximal visual acuity of 0.60 +/- 0.19. For all patients, visual acuity improved during the follow-up by at least 0.20. Two (40%) patients developed intraocular pressure values higher than 21 mm Hg, which could be controlled by topical antiglaucomatous treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide may be a therapeutic option for long-standing cystoid macular edema after cataract surgery.     

The efficacy of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide on macular edema in branch retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide as primary treatment of macular edema in branch retinal vein occlusion. METHODS: Fifteen eyes of 15 patients with macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion (Group 1) who received 8 mg/0.2 ml of intravitreal triamcinolone injection as primary treatment were retrospectively evaluated. The control group (Group 2) consisted of 19 eyes of 19 patients who had received laser treatment for macular edema. The main outcome measures included best-corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and macular edema map values of Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph II. RESULTS: In Group 1, mean visual acuity improved significantly from a mean logMAR (logarithm of minimal angle of resolution) value of 0.98+/-0.19 at baseline to a maximum of 0.24+/-0.24 during a mean follow-up time of 6.3 months. In the control group, the mean baseline log-MAR visual acuity before laser treatment was 1.02+/-0.22, and it was 0.50+/-0.28 at 6-month examinations. Mean improvement in visual acuity at 1-, 3-, and 6-month examinations was significantly higher in Group 1 when compared with the control group (for each, p<0.001). The mean edema map value of Group 1 significantly decreased by 40% at 6-month examinations when compared with preinjection value (p<0.001). In Group 1, mean increase in intraocular pressure elevation was 19.8% at the 1-month, 26.9% at 3-month, and 5.7% at 6-month visits, but intraocular pressures were under control with topical antiglaucomatous medications. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection may be a new and promising approach as initial therapy for macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion.     

Intraocular injection of crystalline cortisone as adjunctive treatment of diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE: To report the clinical outcome of a diabetic patient with macular edema treated with an intravitreal injection of crystalline cortisone. METHODS: Interventional case report. A 73-year-old patient with diabetes mellitus presented with clinically significant diffuse macular edema caused by nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. Despite grid laser coagulation in the macular region, cystoid macular edema progressed, and within 6 months before the cortisone injection, visual acuity declined from 0.25 to 0.16 and, finally, to 0.10. The patient received a single intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide with topical anesthesia. RESULTS: After the intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide, visual acuity improved from 0.10 to 0.40 during the follow-up period spanning 5 months. Intraocular pressure increased to values up to 30 mm Hg before antiglaucomatous treatment. CONCLUSION: Intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide may be useful for treatment of diabetic macular edema resistant to conventional therapy.     

Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for treatment of intraocular proliferative, exudative, and neovascular diseases

Within the last three years, triamcinolone acetonide has increasingly been applied intravitreally as treatment option for various intraocular neovascular edematous and proliferative disorders. The best response in terms of gain in visual acuity after the intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide was found in eyes with intraretinal edematous diseases such as diffuse diabetic macular edema, branch retinal vein occlusion, central retinal vein occlusion, and pseudophakic cystoid macular edema. Visual acuity increased and degree of intraocular inflammation decreased in eyes with various types of non-infectious uveitis including acute or chronic sympathetic ophthalmia and Adamantiadis-Behcet's disease. Intravitreal triamcinolone may be useful as angiostatic therapy in eyes with iris neovascularization and proliferative ischemic retinopathies. Possibly, intravitreal triamcinolone may be helpful as adjunct therapy for exudative age-related macular degeneration, possibly in combination with photodynamic therapy. In eyes with chronic, therapy resistant, ocular hypotony, intravitreal triamcinolone can induce an increase in intraocular pressure and may stabilize the eye. The complications of intravitreal triamcinolone therapy include secondary ocular hypertension in about 40% of the eyes injected, cataractogenesis, postoperative infectious and non-infectious endophthalmitis, and pseudo-endophthalmitis. Intravitreal triamcinolone injection can be combined with other intraocular surgeries including cataract surgery. Cataract surgery performed some months after the injection does not show a markedly elevated rate of complications. If vision increases and eventually decreases again after an intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection, the injection can be repeated. The duration of the effect of a single intravitreal injection of triamcinolone depended on the dosage given. Given in a dosage of about 20mg to non-vitrectomized eyes, the duration of the effect and of the side-effects was 6-9 months. Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide may offer a possibility for adjunctive treatment of intraocular edematous and neovascular disorders. One has to take into account the side-effects and the lack of long-term follow-up observations.     

Intravitreal cortisone injection for refractory diffuse diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection in patients with diffuse diabetic macular edema. We also compared the effect of intravitreal triamcinolone with macular grid laser photocoagulation in macular edema. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with diabetic diffuse macular edema unresponsive to grid laser photocoagulation for at least 4 months received 0.1 ml (4 mg/ml) intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (Kenakort-A) injection as treatment. This study group was compared with a control group of 30 patients (30 eyes) who had undergone grid laser macular coagulation. Mean follow-up time was 17 months (range 14-24 months) in the study group and 19 months (range 16-24 months) in the control group. RESULTS: In the study group, mean improvement in visual acuity measured 3.8, 3.4, 0.9 and 0.2 Snellen lines at the follow-up intervals of 1, 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively. Improvement in visual acuity was statistically significant only at 1 month (p = 0.002) and 3 months (p = 0.003) after injection. Visual acuity was significantly (p < 0.05) better in the study group than the control group at 1 and 3 months. Overall, 6 of 30 eyes (20%) required a second injection and 3 eyes (10%) a third due to regression in visual acuity. Towards the end of the follow-up period, the visual acuity decreased to almost baseline levels. Elevation of intraocular pressure was found in 4 patients and controlled with topical antiglaucomatosis treatment. Sterile endophthalmitis was detected in only one eye. No eye exhibited cataract progression during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Intravitreal injection of triamcinolone may be beneficial for temporarily increasing visual acuity in patients with diabetic diffuse macular edema who are unresponsive even to grid laser photocoagulation. But the regression of visual acuity looks inevitable in the long term after injection. Therefore, repeated injections with/without increasing doses might be required for the stabilization of visual acuity.     

Relation between reduction of foveal thickness and visual acuity in diabetic macular edema treated with intravitreal triamcinolone

PURPOSE: To evaluate the correlation between improvement in visual acuity and the reduction of foveal thickness after a single intravitreal injection of 4 mg of triamcinolone in diabetic macular edema. DESIGN: Prospective, interventional, nonrandomized clinical trial. METHOD: Patients: In a prospective study 24 eyes with diabetic macular edema were treated with an intravitreal injection of 4 mg of triamcinolone acetonide. Main Outcome Measures: Best-corrected logMAR visual acuity and optical coherence tomography were performed at baseline and 3 months after the treatment. RESULTS: At baseline the average foveal thickness was 462 +/- 154 microm (95% confidence interval, 397-527 microm) and at 3 months 257 +/-114 microm (95% confidence interval, 209-305 microm) (P < .0001). The best-corrected logMAR average visual acuity was 60.5 +/- 10.5 (95% confidence interval, 56.0-65.0) ETDRS letters at baseline compared with 65.5 +/- 11.1 (95% confidence interval, 60.8-70.1) 3 months after the injection (P = .0001). There was no correlation between the improvement in visual acuity and the reduction of foveal thickness (r = 0.054, P = .8), but there was a correlation between reduction in foveal thickness and the age of the patients (r = 0.53, P = .008). CONCLUSION: A single injection of 4 mg of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide effectively reduces the foveal thickness in diabetic macular edema and improves visual acuity, but there does not appear to be a strong correlation between the reduction of foveal thickness and the improvement in visual acuity.     

Cataract surgery combined with intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether the addition of cataract surgery to an intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide markedly increases frequency and spectrum of complications. METHODS: The comparative nonrandomized clinical interventional investigation included a study group of 60 eyes (56 patients) undergoing cataract surgery and additionally receiving an intravitreal injection of about 20 mg of triamcinolone acetonide and a triamcinolone control group of 290 eyes (262 patients) that consecutively received an intravitreal injection of about 20 mg triamcinolone acetonide without cataract surgery. Reasons for intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide were exudative age-related macular degeneration (n=228; 65%), diffuse diabetic macular edema (n=94; 27%), central retinal vein occlusion (n=17; 5%), and branch retinal vein occlusion (n=11; 3%). Mean follow-up was 8.6+/-6.8 months. A second control group included 1068 patients (1068 eyes) who consecutively underwent routine cataract surgery without intravitreal injection. RESULTS: Study group and triamcinolone control group did not vary significantly in best visual acuity during follow-up (p=0.08), final visual acuity at the end of follow-up (p=0.30), maximal intraocular pressure during follow-up (p=0.99), frequency of an intraocular pressure higher than 21 mmHg (p=0.66), and intraocular pressure at the end of follow-up (p=0.06). Postoperative infectious endophthalmitis, wound leakage or other corneal wound healing problems, persisting corneal endothelial decompensation, rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, marked postoperative pain, or a clinically significant decentration of the intraocular lens were not observed. Study group and the non-triamcinolone control group did not vary significantly in the rate of posterior lens capsule rupture (p=0.11), postoperative infectious endophthalmitis, and persisting postoperative corneal endothelial decompensation. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of cataract surgery to an intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide may not markedly increase amount and frequency of side effects and complications of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide. No safe conclusions can be reached regarding differences in frequency of postoperative infectious endophthalmitis.     

Intravitreal versus posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide for diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE: To compare the short-term effects of intravitreal versus posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide for diabetic macular edema. METHODS: This is a prospective and interventional study. Sixty eyes of 60 patients who had diffuse diabetic macular edema were assigned to receive a single intravitreal injection (4 mg) or a single posterior subtenon injection (40 mg) of triamcinolone acetonide. The central retinal thickness was measured using optical coherent tomography before injection and at 1 and 3 months after injection. Visual acuity and intraocular pressure (IOP) were also measured. RESULTS: Both intravitreal and posterior subtenon injections of triamcinolone acetonide resulted in significant improvements in visual acuity at 1 month and 3 months after injection. Both groups resulted in a significant decrease in central macular thickness (CMT) at 1 month and 3 months post-injection. IOP in the intravitreal injection group was significantly higher than in the posterior subtenon injection group at 3 months after injection. CONCLUSIONS: The posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide had a comparable effect to the intravitreal triamcinolone injection and showed a lower risk of elevated IOP. Posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide may be a good alternative for the treatment of diffuse diabetic macular edema.     

Two-year results of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection for the treatment of diabetic macular edema

Purpose To investigate 2-year results of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection for the treatment of diffuse diabetic macular edema unresponsive to previous laser photocoagulation. Method The study included 75 eyes of 75 diabetic patients with clinically significant diffuse macular edema that had failed to respond to previous laser photocoagulation. An intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide at the dose of 4 mg/0.1 ml was administered. Best-corrected visual acuity was measured as the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), and central macular thickness was obtained by optical coherence tomography at each visit. Intraocular pressure and lenticular status were also evaluated. Differences among measurements were evaluated by Friedman two-way analysis of variance by ranks. Mean follow-up period was 24.7 ± 5.9 months. Results The mean central macular thickness, which was obtained 3 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months postoperatively, was significantly different from the baseline measurement (P < 0.001). Mean best-corrected logMAR visual acuity improved significantly from baseline at the 1- month and 3-month follow-up intervals (P < 0.05), but there was no significant change at the 6- month, 9-month, 12-month, 18-month or 24-month follow-up periods (P > 0.05). During the follow-up, 29 (38.7%) eyes received re-injection of intravitreal triamcinolone. Twenty-one (28%) eyes developed intraocular pressure values higher than 21 mmHg, and 18 (24%) eyes developed cataract. Thirteen (17.3%) eyes required cataract and/or glaucoma surgery. Conclusions In refractory diabetic macular edema, intravitreal triamcinolone effectively reduces foveal thickness and improves visual acuity in the short term, but with the extended follow-up, the number of recurrences and steroid-related complications were shown to increase. Nevertheless, it may be a therapeutic option in some patients that do not respond to previous laser photocoagulation.