Trauma in nonagenarians and centenarians: review of 137 consecutive patients

The purpose of this study was to examine the hospital course and outcomes of elderly trauma patients. We accomplished a retrospective review of all consecutive trauma patients admitted to a level II trauma center from January 2000 to April 2002. Gender, Injury Severity Score (ISS), length of stay (LOS), operative procedure, morbidity, and mortality of patients > or = 90 years of age were compared with younger patients. Of 2645 trauma admissions, 137 patients (5%) were > or = 90 years (range, 90 to 108 years; mean, 93.1 years); 5 patients were > or = 100 years. One hundred eleven (81%) patients were female; 26 (19%) male. Average ISS for patients > or = 90 was 8.75 and was 7.78 for younger patients. One hundred sixteen elderly patients (85%) had ISS < 15. Falls were the most common mechanism of injury (93%), usually ground-level falls (64%). Two hundred ninety-two injuries included 133 fractures and 102 soft tissue injuries. Thirty-four elderly patients (25%) and 733 younger patients (29%) required surgery. Complications developed in 8 per cent of older and 6 per cent of younger patients. Hospital LOS averaged 4.36 days for older and 3.51 days for younger patients. Six older (4.4%) and 63 younger (2.5%) patients died. ISS scores and LOS were slightly higher in elderly patients, but morbidity and mortality were comparable in both groups.     

Trauma in the elderly: intensive care unit resource use and outcome

BACKGROUND: As the population ages, the elderly will constitute a prominent proportion of trauma patients. The elderly suffer more severe consequences from traumatic injuries compared with the young, presumably resulting in increased resource use. In this study, we sought to examine ICU resource use in trauma on the basis of age and injury severity. METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of trauma registry data prospectively collected on 26,237 blunt trauma patients admitted to all trauma centers (n = 26) in one state over 24 months (January 1996-December 1997). Age-dependent and injury severity-dependent differences in mortality, ICU length of stay (LOS), and hospital LOS were evaluated by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Elderly (age > or = 65 years, n = 7,117) patients had significantly higher mortality rates than younger (age < 65 years) trauma patients after stratification by Injury Severity Score (ISS), Revised Trauma Score, and other preexisting comorbidities. Age > 65 years was associated with a two- to threefold increased mortality risk in mild (ISS < 15, 3.2% vs. 0.4%; < 0.001), moderate (ISS 15-29, 19.7% vs. 5.4%; < 0.001), and severe traumatic injury (ISS > or = 30, 47.8% vs. 21.7%; < 0.001) compared with patients aged < 65 years. Logistic regression analysis confirmed that elderly patients had a nearly twofold increased mortality risk (odds ratio, 1.87; confidence interval, 1.60-2.18; < 0.001). Elderly patients also had significantly longer hospital LOS after stratifying for severity of injury by ISS (1.9 fewer days in the age 18-45 group, 0.89 fewer days in the age 46-64 group compared with the age > or = 65 group). Mortality rates were higher for men than for women only in the ISS < 15 (4.4% vs. 2.6%, < 0.001) and ISS 15 to 29 (21.7% vs. 17.6%, = 0.031) groups. ICU LOS was significantly decreased in elderly patients with ISS > or = 30. CONCLUSION: Age is confirmed as an independent predictor of outcome (mortality) in trauma after stratification for injury severity in this largest study of elderly trauma patients to date. Elderly patients with severe injury (ISS > 30) have decreased ICU resource use secondary to associated increased mortality rates.     

Elderly trauma patients with rib fractures are at greater risk of death and pneumonia

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to show that elderly patients admitted with rib fractures after blunt trauma have increased mortality. METHODS: Demographic, injury severity, and outcome data on a cohort of consecutive adult trauma admissions with rib fractures to a tertiary care trauma center from April 1, 1993, to March 31, 2000, were extracted from our trauma registry. RESULTS: Among 4,325 blunt trauma admissions, there were 405 (9.4%) patients with rib fractures; 113 were aged > or = 65. Injuries were severe, with Injury Severity Score (ISS) > or = 16 in 54.8% of cases, a mean hospital stay of 26.8 +/- 43.7 days, and 28.6% of patients requiring mechanical ventilation. Mortality (19.5% vs. 9.3%; p < 0.05), presence of comorbidity (61.1% vs. 8.6%; p < 0.0001), and falls (14.6% vs. 0.7%; p < 0.0001) were significantly higher in patients aged > or = 65 despite significantly lower ISS (p = 0.031), higher Glasgow Coma Scale score (p = 0.0003), and higher Revised Trauma Score (p < 0.0001). After adjusting for severity (i.e., ISS and Revised Trauma Score), comorbidity, and multiple rib fractures, patients aged > or = 65 had five times the odds of dying when compared with those < 65 years old. CONCLUSION: Despite lower indices of injury severity, even after taking account of comorbidities, mortality was significantly increased in elderly patients admitted to a trauma center with rib fractures.     

Pelvic fracture in geriatric patients: a distinct clinical entity

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to describe differences in demographics, injury pattern, transfusion needs, and outcome of pelvic fractures in older versus younger patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective registry review of all patients with pelvic fractures admitted directly from the scene between January 1998 and December 1999. RESULTS: We cared for 234 patients with pelvic fractures during the study period. Mean age was 37.2 years, 51% were men, and mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 19. Overall mortality was 9%. Eighty-three percent were under the age of 55 years and 17% were older than 55 years. Severe pelvic fractures (AP3, LC3) were more common in young patients (p < 0.05). Admitting systolic blood pressure was lower and heart rate higher, although ISS was not different between the two age groups. Older patients were 2.8 times as likely to undergo transfusion (p < 0.005), and those undergoing transfusion required more blood (median, 7.5 units vs. 5 units). Older patients underwent angiography more frequently and were significantly more likely to die in the hospital even after adjusting for ISS (p < 0.005). This was most marked with ISS 15 to 25. Lateral compression (LC) fractures occurred 4.6 times more frequently in older patients than anteroposterior (AP) compression, and 8.2 times more frequently in those older patients undergoing transfusion as compared with AP compression. Ninety-eight percent of LC fractures in older patients were minor (LC1,2). However, older patients with LC fractures were nearly four times as likely to require blood compared with younger patients. CONCLUSION: In older patients, pelvic fractures are more likely to produce hemorrhage and require angiography. Fracture patterns differ in older patients, with LC fractures occurring more frequently, and commonly causing significant blood loss. The outcome of older patients with pelvic fractures is significantly worse than younger patients, particularly with higher injury severity. Recognition of these differences should help clinicians to identify patients at high risk for bleeding and death early, and to refine diagnostic and resuscitation strategies.     

Survival after trauma in geriatric patients.

In contrast to other studies, a recent report from the authors' institution has shown a good prognosis for functional recovery in geriatric patients that survive trauma. Because most survivors regained their pre-injury function, the authors examined factors related to nonsurvival in this population of 82 consecutive blunt trauma victims older than the age of 65. Seventeen patients died (21%). Compared with survivors, nonsurvivors were older, had more severe overall injury, and had more severe head and neck trauma but did not differ in severity of trauma that did not involve the head and neck, number of body regions injured, mechanism of injury, or incidence of surgery after injury. Nonsurvivors experienced more frequent complications (82% vs. 33%, p less than 0.05), including a higher incidence of cardiac complications (53% vs. 15%, p less than 0.05) and ventilator dependence for 5 or more days (41% vs. 14%, p less than 0.05). Mortality rates were increased in patients who were 80 years of age or older compared with those ages 65-79 (46% vs. 10%, p less than 0.01), despite injury of similar severity. More frequent complications may contribute to an increased mortality rate in the older group, including an increased incidence of prolonged mechanical ventilation (36% vs. 12%, p less than 0.025), cardiac complications (54% vs. 10%, p less than 0.01), and pneumonia (36% vs. 16%, p less than 0.06). Severely injured patients (Injury Severity Score [ISS] greater than or equal to 25) older than 80 years old had a mortality rate of 80%, and the survivors required permanent nursing home care. Discriminant analysis yielded a reliable method of differentiating survivors from nonsurvivors based on age, ISS, and the presence of cardiac and septic complications. To assess the accuracy of the discriminant function, 61 consecutive patients admitted during 1985 were reviewed prospectively. Discriminant scoring predicted outcome correctly in 92% of these patients. A Geriatric Trauma Survival Score (GTSS) based on the discriminant function was calculated for each of the 143 patients studied and was highly correlated with mortality rate (r = 0.99, p less than 0.001). Thus, the GTSS may serve as a valuable tool for evaluating death in geriatric trauma victims. Furthermore, because complications are potentially avoidable and contribute to increased mortality rates, routine aggressive care for geriatric patients with moderate overall injury is indicated.     

High-level falls: type and severity of injuries and survival outcome according to age

BACKGROUND: High-level falls are associated with multiple injuries and are often difficult to evaluate. Age may be an important factor determining the anatomic distribution and severity of injuries and outcome. There is little work published on this subject. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of age on the incidence and severity of specific organ injuries and survival outcome after high-level falls. METHODS: This was a trauma registry study that included all victims of high-level falls (>15 feet) admitted to a Level I academic trauma center. The incidence of severe trauma (Injury Severity Score > 15), severe body area trauma (head, chest, abdomen, and extremities) with Abbreviated Injury Scale score > 3, specific organ injuries (spine, thoracic aorta, solid and hollow viscus intra-abdominal injuries, and pelvic and lower extremity fractures), and mortality were compared in four age groups: < or =14 years, 15 to 55 years, 56 to 65 years, and >65 years. RESULTS: The study included 1,613 patients. There were 128 patients (7.9%) in the age group < or =14 years, 1,389 (86.1%) in the age group 15 to 55 years, 59 (3.7%) in the age group 56 to 65 years, and 37 (2.3%) in the age group >65 years. The mortality ranged from 5.5% in the pediatric group to 24.3% in the elderly group (p = 0.02). Significantly more patients in the elderly group had an Injury Severity Score > 15 than in the pediatric group (45.2% vs. 15.6%, p = 0.001). The overall incidence of spinal fractures was 24.1% (392 cases) and increased significantly after the age of 15 years. Elderly patients were significantly more likely than pediatric patients to suffer pelvic fractures (21.6% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.0001) and more likely to have fractures of the femur (18.9% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.006). The nature of intracranial injuries and the incidence of solid and hollow viscus injuries were similar in all age groups. CONCLUSION: Age is an important variable in determining the nature and severity of injuries after high-level falls. Spinal injuries are very common in all age groups older than 14 years.     

Penetrating trauma in patients older than 55 years: a case-control study

BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have compared young and elderly blunt trauma patients, and concluded that, because elderly patients have outcomes similar to young patients, aggressive resuscitation should be offered regardless of age. Similar data on penetrating trauma patients are limited. STUDY DESIGN: In a retrospective review, 79 patients with penetrating injuries and age > or =55 were blindly matched for Injury Severity Score (ISS) and Abbreviated Injury Scores (AIS) with 79 penetrating trauma patients aged 15-35 years, who were admitted to the hospital over the same 4 year period (June 1994-June 1998). Mortality rates and length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and the hospital were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The average ISS for all patients was 12 (range 1-75) and identical for both groups. Both groups had similar injuries and were evaluated by an equal number and type of diagnostic studies. The mean ISS was not different between severely injured older and younger patients who required ICU admission or died. Among 32 nonsurvivors (18 older and 14 younger), older patients were more likely than younger patients to present with normal vital signs, although the comparison did not reach statistical significance (50% vs. 13%, P=0.25). There was a clinically significant trend for longer ICU (15+/-30 vs. 3+/-2 days, P=0.096) and hospital stay (10+/-18 vs. 6+/-8 days, P=0.08) among older patients, but mortality rates were similar (23% in older vs. 18% in younger, P=NS). Furthermore, these outcome parameters showed no difference when both groups were classified according to severity of injury or physiologic response. CONCLUSIONS: Following penetrating trauma, older patients arriving alive and admitted to the hospital are as likely to survive as younger patients who have injuries of similar severity, but at the expense of longer ICU and hospital stays.     

Acute subdural hematomas: an age-dependent clinical entity

Reports prior to 1980 describe overall mortality rates for acute subdural hematomas (SDH's) ranging from 40% to 90% with poor outcomes observed in all age groups. Recently, improved results have been reported with rapid diagnosis and surgical treatment. A relatively large number of older patients (34 patients over 65 years old) were treated recently at Harborview Medical Center, enabling a retrospective comparison with similarly treated younger patients (33 patients aged 18 to 40 years). Clinical information and computerized tomography morphometric data were obtained. Patients in the younger group were most often injured in motor-vehicle accidents (15 cases), whereas falls were most frequent in the older group (19 cases). Patients in both groups were rapidly resuscitated in the field; more than 30% were treated within 1 hour after the time of injury. Injury severity, determined by the admission Glasgow Coma Scale score, was similar for the two groups. Mean acute SDH volume was significantly larger in the older patients than in the younger group (mean +/- standard deviation: 96.2 +/- 117.2 vs. 21.6 + 27.7 cu cm), as was the amount of midline shift (1.2 +/- 1.69 vs. 0.6 +/- 0.75 cm). Surgical treatments were similar, but outcomes were dramatically different for the younger and older patients. Mortality rates were more than four times higher in older patients than in younger ones (74% vs. 18%). Three older patients and 25 younger patients were functional survivors. Old age, a larger SDH volume, and a larger midline shift all correlated with a poor outcome. The results of this study suggest that the pathophysiology of acute SDH varies with age, and that currently employed resuscitation and treatment methods have differentially improved the outcome for younger patients.     

Young versus old: factors affecting mortality after blunt traumatic injury

Advanced age predicts poor outcome after trauma. We have previously demonstrated that prolonged occult hypoperfusion (POH), defined as serum lactic acid >2.4 mmol/L persisting for >12 hours, is also associated with worse outcomes. We hypothesized that older patients--a group with potentially less physiologic reserve--would be at greater risk from POH. Prospective data from adult blunt trauma patients admitted to a surgical/trauma intensive care unit from January 1, 1998 through December 31, 1999 were analyzed. Mortality, POH, Injury Severity Score (ISS), chronic health designation (CH) from the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation, emergency department Glasgow Coma Scale score (EDGCS), emergency department systolic blood pressure (EDSBP), and gender were compared between older (>55 years) and younger (<56 years) patients and then between nonsurvivors and survivors within age cohorts. Two hundred sixty-four patients were analyzed: 195 younger and 69 older. Mortality was 8.3 per cent (22/264). Older patients had higher mortality (20.3% vs 4.1%, P < 0.05), higher CH (42.9% +/- 1.3 vs 8.4% +/- 0.6), lower ISS (22.6 +/- 1.5 vs 25.6 +/- 0.8, P < 0.05), higher EDGCS (12.9 +/- 0.5 vs 10.7 +/- 0.4, P < 0.05), and higher EDSBP (141.5 +/- 4.1 vs 129.3 +/- 2.2). There were no differences in incidence of POH and gender. Within both age cohorts nonsurvivors had higher ISS, lower EDGCS, and higher CH. Older patients with POH had 34.6 per cent mortality as compared with 11.6 per cent for no POH (P < 0.05). Mortality in younger patients was no different in the presence of POH, and all non-survivors were male. Despite lower ISS and higher EDGCS and EDSBP older patients had five times the mortality of younger patients. Age-specific mortality was influenced by POH and gender. POH was associated with higher mortality only in older patients. With less physiologic reserve older patients may not have been able to adequately compensate for POH; this emphasizes the importance of rapidly correcting serum lactic acid as an endpoint in resuscitation in this population.     

Falls in older people: comparing older and younger fallers in a developing country

Purpose

While falls are common in older people, causing significant mortality and morbidity, this phenomenon has not been extensively studied in the Caribbean. This study aimed to compare falls in older and younger people in this setting.

Methods

We conducted a prospective observational study of older trauma patients in Trinidad, comparing older and younger patients sustaining falls.

Results

1432 adult trauma patients were included (1141 aged 18–64 years and 291 aged 65 years and older). Older fallers were more likely to be female (66.7 vs 47.2%; p < 0.001), suffer from multiple pre-existing diseases (24.7 vs 2.4%; p < 0.001) and take multiple medications (16.1 vs 0.8%; p < 0.001). They also sustained more severe injuries and presented with higher acuity than younger fallers. Admission rates were higher among older fallers (29.9 vs 13.1%; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

In our study, older patients who fell were a distinct group from younger falls victims, with unique demographic, clinical and injury related characteristics. Their increased risk of injury within the home, coupled with their propensity for more severe injuries made them a high risk patient group. More research is needed to better understand this patient group and plan specific preventive interventions.

     

The effect of age on functional outcome in mild traumatic brain injury: 6-month report of a prospective multicenter trial

OBJECTIVE: Elderly patients (aged 60 years and older) have been demonstrated to have an increased mortality after isolated traumatic brain injury (TBI); however, the prognosis of those patients surviving their hospitalization is unknown. We hypothesized that surviving elderly patients would also have decreased functional outcome, and this study examined the functional outcome of patients with isolated TBI at discharge and at 6 months posthospitalization. METHODS: This was a multicenter prospective study of all patients with isolated moderate to severe TBI defined as Head Abbreviated Injury Scale score of 3 with an Abbreviated Injury Scale score in any other body area of 1. Patients surviving to discharge gave their consent and were enrolled. Data collected included demographics, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score at admission, and neurosurgical interventions. Outcome data included discharge disposition and Glasgow Outcome Scale score and modified Functional Independence Measure (FIM) score at discharge and at 6 months. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-five patients were enrolled, with 44 (19%) aged greater than or equal to 65 years. Mechanisms of injury were falls (34%), assaults (28%), motor vehicle collisions (14%), pedestrian (11%), and other (12%). Falls were more common in the older patients and assaults in the younger group. The mean admitting GCS score was 12.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.4-13.3), with older patients having a higher mean GCS score, 14.1 (95% CI, 13.6-14.6) versus 12.5 (95% CI, 12.0-13.1; p = 0.03). There were no differences in the percentage of patients admitted to the intensive care unit or requiring neurosurgical intervention between younger and older patients. Because there were few elderly patients with low GCS scores who survived to discharge, outcome measures focused on those patients with GCS scores of 13 to 15. A greater percentage of elderly were discharged to rehabilitation (28% vs. 16%, p =0.08). The mean discharge FIM score was 10.4 (95% CI, 9.8-11.0) for the elderly versus 11.4 (95% CI, 11.1-11.7) for the young (p =0.001), with 68% elderly and 89% young discharged with total independent scores of 11 to 12. At 6 months, the difference narrowed, but the mean FIM score was still greater for the young group, 11.7 (95% CI, 11.6-11.9) versus 11.0 (95% CI, 10.6-11.4; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Functional outcome after isolated mild TBI as measured by the Glasgow Outcome Scale and modified FIM is generally good to excellent for both elderly and younger patients. Older patients required more inpatient rehabilitation and lagged behind their younger counterparts but continued to recover and improve after discharge. Although there were statistically significant differences in the FIM score at both discharge and 6 months, the clinical importance of these small differences in the mean FIM score to the patient's quality of life is less clear. Measurable improvement in functional status during the first 6 months after injury is observed in both groups. Aggressive management and care of older patients with TBI is warranted, and efforts should be made to decrease inpatient mortality. Continued follow-up is ongoing to determine whether these outcomes persist at 12 months.     

Mortality in Severely Injured Elderly Trauma Patients—When Does Age Become a Risk Factor?

Age is a well-known risk factor in trauma patients. The aim of the present study was to define the age-dependent cut-off for increasing mortality in multiple injured patients. Pre-existing medical conditions in older age and impaired age-dependent physiologic reserve contributing to a worse outcome in multiple injured elderly patients are discussed as reasons for increased mortality. A retrospective clinical study of a statewide trauma data set from 1993 through 2000 included 5375 patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) > or = 16 who were stratified by age. The ISS and Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) quantified the injury severity. Outcome measures were mortality, shock, multiple organ failure, and severe head injury. Mortality in this series increased beginning at age 56 years, and that increase was independent of the ISS. The mortality rate increased from 7.3% (patients 46-55 years of age) to 13.0% (patients ages 56-65 years) in patients with ISS 16-24; from 23.8% to 32.1% in those with ISS 25-50; and from 62.2% to 82.1% in those with ISS 51-75 (P < or = 0.05). Severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) was the most frequent cause of death, with a significant peak in patients older than 75 years. The incidence of lethal multiple organ failure increased significantly beginning at age 56 years (P < or = 0.05), but it showed no further increase in patients aged 76 years or older. In contrast, the incidence of lethal shock showed a significant increase from age 76 years (P < or = 0.05), but not at age 56 years. However, from age 56 years, mortality increased significantly in patients who sustained multiple trauma-an increase that was independent of trauma severity.     

Unsafe at any age: a retrospective review of all-terrain vehicle injuries in two level I trauma centers from 1995 to 2003

BACKGROUND: All-terrain vehicles (ATVs) are popular recreational and utility vehicles. In 1984, Cogbill published an article regarding three-wheelers. These are no longer manufactured, but the injury and death rate with four-wheeled ATVs is high and disproportionately affects young riders. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review at two Level I trauma centers from January 1994 to April 2003. Statistical analysis was performed using the SAS V8.2 program. Values of p < 0.05 were significant. RESULTS: Two hundred eight patients were identified. There were no differences identified in demographics, mechanism, types of injury, Injury Severity Score (ISS), or Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score. Seventy-five percent were male and 84% were white. The mean age was 23 +/- 13 years. The average ISS was 12.3 +/- 9 and the mean GCS score was 13.1 +/- 3.7. Injury mechanisms were loss of stability (33%), separation of rider from ATV (32%), and ATV versus stationary object (27%). ISS for ages 12 to 15 years was significantly higher than for other ages (14.5 vs. 11.5, p = 0.04, Wilcoxon rank sum test) and included more major head injuries (40.4% vs. 21.8%, p = 0.09, Wilcoxon rank sum test). They experienced fewer spinal fractures (3.9% vs. 15.4%, p = 0.03) and pelvic injuries (0% vs. 9%, p = 0.02, Wilcoxon rank sum test). The GCS score in this group was lower (12.3 vs. 13.4, p = 0.03, Wilcoxon rank sum test). CONCLUSION: Adolescent ATV riders have more severe injuries and more head injuries than other age groups. Prevention efforts should target this group.     

An appraisal of trauma in the elderly

To review the trends of trauma in the elderly experienced at our trauma center compared with other Level I trauma centers. This was a retrospective trauma registry analysis (1996-2003) of 2783 blunt trauma in elderly (BTE) and 4568 adult (BTA) patients in a Level 1 trauma center. Falls and motor vehicular crashes were the most common mechanisms noted in 47 per cent and 31 per cent (84% and 13% in BTE, 25% and 42% in BTA). BTE were sicker, with higher Injury Severity Scores (ISS), lengths of stay, and mortality (5% vs 2%, P value < 0.05). ISS was 5.2-fold higher in nonsurvivors to survivors in BTA and 2.4-fold in BTE. Elevation in ISS resulted in higher linear increase in mortality in BTE (vs BTA) at any ISS level. Mortality in patients with ISS > or = 25 was 43.5 per cent vs 23.8 per cent. ISS > or = 50 had 31 per cent adult survivors but no elderly survivors. Among isolated injuries, head trauma in the elderly carried the highest mortality, at 12 per cent (19% in patients with an Abbreviated Injury Score > or = 3). Abdominal injuries were the most lethal (18.3% and 41.2% in patients with an Abbreviated Injury Score > or = 3) in multiple trauma victims (41% vs 18% in isolated trauma). There was 4.4-fold increased mortality in the presence of thoracic trauma. Combined head, chest, and abdominal trauma carried the worst prognosis. Thirty-four per cent of BTE and 88 per cent of BTA patients were discharged home. Elderly patients need more aggressive therapy, as they are sicker with higher mortality.     

Low falls: an underappreciated mechanism of injury

OBJECTIVE: This is a retrospective study designed to evaluate the pattern and severity of injuries that result from low falls, defined as falls from less than 20 ft, subsequent mortality, and requirements of hospital resources. Our hypothesis is that many of these injuries, even without cardiopulmonary instability, are worthy of trauma center care. METHODS: The records of all patients entered into the hospital trauma registry at an urban Level I trauma center during the years 1991 through 1997 who suffered low falls and who either died after admission or were hospitalized for at least 3 days were reviewed. Patients suffering isolated hip fractures were excluded. One hundred seventy-six patients constituted the study population. This group accounts for about 2% of all admissions for falls at our institution. Patterns of injury were examined. Age, mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score (ISS), and cardiopulmonary or neurologic instability on admission were documented. Mortality, length of intensive care unit and hospital stays, as well as billed hospital charges, were reviewed. RESULTS: The majority of patients (62%) were younger than 50 years. Sixty patients had ISS >15 and 116 patients had ISS >9. Sixty patients had multisystem injuries requiring specialty care. Head injuries were found in 81 patients (35%), and vertebral fractures or spinal cord injuries were found in 49 patients (22%), including 9 quadriplegics and 5 paraplegics. There were seven patients with intra-abdominal injuries (five spleen and two bowel injuries). There was one patient with a rupture of the thoracic aorta. Seventeen patients had deteriorating neurologic or pulmonary function on arrival, but the majority (90%) were stable. Of the 159 "stable" patients, 48 suffered head injuries, 7 were quadriplegic, and 3 were paraplegic. All intra-abdominal injuries were in this group. Overall, 14 of 176 patients (8%) died. Seven deaths were in patients older than 60 years, and seven deaths were in younger patients (p = 0.04). The majority of deaths (9 of 14) were from head trauma. Care in the intensive care unit was required in 92 of 176 patients. Nine patients had billed charges exceeding $100,000. CONCLUSION: Low falls can cause significant injuries, most commonly to the head and spine. Based on mechanism of injury alone, patients injured in low falls might not be taken to trauma centers. We have found, however, that many of these patients sustain serious multisystem injuries, even though they are stable initially. Although these patients represent only a fraction of those who fall, our study would support adjustment of triage guidelines to recommend transport of such patients, particularly elderly patients, to trauma centers.     

Gender-related outcomes in trauma

BACKGROUND: Recent data suggest that sex hormones may play a role in regulating posttraumatic immunosuppression, leading to gender-based differences in outcome after injuries. This study examined gender-related outcomes in trauma patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of trauma registry data from our Level I trauma center over a 4-year period. Patients > 15 years of age, with Injury Severity Scores > 15, who survived and received mechanical ventilation for > 48 hours were included. Patients were divided into two groups on the basis of age (15-45 years and > 45 years) and the groups were further stratified by gender. Groups were matched by Injury Severity Scores, Glasgow Coma Scale score, Abbreviated Injury Score for the head, and transfusion requirement. Gender-based outcomes consisted of ventilator days, intensive care unit length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, pneumonia, and death. RESULTS: Data were reported as mean +/- SD. There were 612 patients. In the younger age group, male patients had a higher incidence of multiple organ failure (10.5% vs. 1.5%), longer intensive care unit (13.5 +/- 9.2 days vs. 9.2 +/- 7.2 days) and hospital LOS (30.2 +/- 37.7 days vs. 18.9 +/- 13.0 days), and higher mortality (13.4% vs. 6.8%) compared with female patients (p < 0.05 for all). These differences did not exist in the older age group. The incidence of pneumonia did not differ by gender. Age > 45 years was associated with higher mortality (odds ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-3.5). CONCLUSION: Although the incidence of pneumonia was not influenced by gender, female trauma patients had better outcomes than male patients in the younger age group. Outcome in the older age group was not gender-related. Our data support a gender-based difference in outcome after traumatic injuries in younger patients.     

Injury and cost comparison of restrained and unrestrained motor vehicle crash victims

The use of active motor vehicle restraints is a topic of current public and legislative debate. To better define the effects of restraint systems on injury severity, the following study was undertaken. Parametric statistical tests were used for data analyses. For a 6-month period beginning February 1, 1987, all motor vehicle crash victims treated in the emergency unit were entered into the study (n = 613). There were 290 unrestrained subjects (UR), 254 restrained subjects (R), and 69 were excluded because restraint usage information was unobtainable. Unrestrained victims were younger (mean age, UR = 28, R = 32; p less than 0.05), and were more often male (UR = 65%, R = 51%; p less than 0.05). Hospitalization was more frequently required for unrestrained crash victims (UR = 59%, R = 26%; p less than 0.05). Length of hospital stay (LOS), including ICU confinement, was also extended (mean LOS, UR = 13, R = 10), but this difference did not reach statistical significance. Injury Severity Scores (ISS) and Abbreviated Injury Scales (AIS) were tabulated and compared. Mean ISS was significantly higher for unrestrained victims (UR = 8.28, R = 4.44; p less than 0.05), and a higher proportion of unrestrained victims had scores greater than 15 (UR = 20%, R = 7%; p less than 0.05). Mean AIS was higher in all regions, although the difference did not consistently reach statistical significance.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

A case control study for major trauma in geriatric patients

This study analyzed age as a univariate factor in survival in a national group of 46,613 major trauma patients and compared 180 elderly major trauma patients (greater than or equal to 65 years) to a similarly injured group of 3,918 younger patients (less than 65 years). In the national group, mortality rose sharply between age 45 (10%) and 55 (15%) and doubled at age 75 years (20%). This age-dependent survival decrement occurred at all Injury Severity Score values, for all mechanisms of injury, and for all body regions. In the comparison study, mortality in the elderly group was nearly double that of mortality in the younger group (27% vs. 14%). The older patients had a markedly higher complication death rate, especially for pulmonary (14/100 vs. 6.1/1100) and infectious complications (4.6/100 vs. 0.7/100). The median length of stay was twice as long for the older patients (14 days vs. 7 days). Cost data showed that the DRG prospective payment system grossly underestimated the cost of care for these patients (mean loss of $2,177.14 per patient). To minimize mortality and morbidity, triaging elderly trauma victims to trauma centers at a much lower threshold than similarly injured younger patients is recommended. The current DRG system should be altered to account for age-dependent morbidity. Further study is needed to determine whether more rigorous infection prophylaxis, immunomodulation, and pulmonary therapy will augment survival in elderly patients.     

Polytrauma in patients of 65 and over. Injury patterns and outcome

In a consecutive series of 416 patients with multiple injuries, 49 were aged 65 years or older (mean age 72.1). This group of "old" patients was compared with the remaining 367 "young" patients (mean age 31.3). In the old patients group, survivors and non-survivors were profiled. In general the injured old patient was a pedestrian hit by a car or a motorbike or someone who had simply fallen at home. Despite the fact that the mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) was significantly lower in the old patients' group (33.2 versus 42.1) (p less than 0.001), the mortality rate was significantly higher (18% versus 7.6%) (p less than 0.05). We found that in the elderly injured the ISS and preexisting diseases were not predictive of survival. However, brain injury with unconsciousness and the need for early intubation followed by long-term assisted ventilation were predictive of survival (p less than 0.001). Seventy-six per cent of the survivors were able to return home again within six months. As the final outcome in the elderly is no worse after polytrauma than after other important emergency procedures, an aggressive treatment including urgent operative fixation of major fractures is in our opinion justified.