A comparison of immediate versus delayed endoscopic injection sclerosis of bleeding esophageal varices

The authors report their experience with immediate endoscopic injection sclerosis at the time of diagnosis of active bleeding esophageal varices compared to delayed sclerotherapy performed after control of variceal bleeding with vasopressin and Sengstaken-Blakemore tamponade. Twenty-eight active index bleeders and 20 active rebleeders were treated by immediate endoscopic injection sclerosis, which could technically be performed on all of the former and in 18 of the rebleeders (96%). Immediate control of active bleeding was achieved in all patients whose varices were injected (100%). Control at 48 hours was 89% for the index bleeding group and 80% for the rebleeding group. In the delayed sclerotherapy group of 19 patients, initial control (79%) and 48-hour control (64%) were significantly less. The rebleeding rate, complications, and death from exsanguination were greater in the delayed group, whereas longevity was similar in both groups. We conclude that immediate sclerotherapy effectively controls acutely bleeding esophageal varices with a lower complication rate than sclerotherapy performed after conventional medical therapy with vasopressin and Sengstaken-Blakemore tube tamponade.     

Therapy and prevention of hemorrhage from esophageal varices

Management of variceal hemorrhage includes emergency treatment of bleeding esophageal varices and prophylactic treatment for the prevention of first bleeding or rebleeding. Endoscopic injection sclerotherapy appears to be the most effective therapeutic option to control acute variceal hemorrhage. When sclerotherapy fails or cannot be performed a Sengstaken-Blakemore tube can be used. Supportive treatment is provided by vasodilator or vasoconstrictor therapy. At present, operative treatment modalities such as portosystemic shunts or esophageal transection are secondary to sclerotherapy or balloon tamponade. The probability of recurrent variceal hemorrhage after a first bleeding is 70%. This necessitates preventive measures such as endoscopic sclerotherapy, beta-blockade, or surgical procedures. Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials indicates that sclerotherapy appears to reduce the number of episodes of recurrent variceal hemorrhage better than other prophylactic treatments and to improve survival. Chronic sclerotherapy may be the procedure of first choice in patients with good liver function when elective shunt surgery is provided for those who have recurrent bleeding despite sclerotherapy. The role of beta-blockade in the prevention of recurrent bleeding remains to be clearly defined. Prevention of first esophageal bleeding by invasive treatment modalities could reasonably only be performed in patients with high bleeding risk, which, however, cannot be defined accurately at present. The use of beta-blockers in the prevention of first variceal hemorrhage should be restricted to clinical trials.     

Do we need endoscopic sclerotherapy of oesophageal varices or the last turn off the light

For the primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding endoscopic band ligation has been shown to be as effective as non-selective beta-blockers (carvedilol), but variceal injection sclerotherapy is not generaly recommended in this setting because of higher rate of complications and lower effect in reducing either bleeding or mortality. Endoscopic management of acutely bleeding gastroesophageal varices includes injection sclerotherapy, rubber band ligation, and variceal obturation with tissue adhesives. Variceal injection sclerotherapy remains a quick, simple and cheap technique for the control of active bleeding from esophageal varices, but is associated with more rebleeding than variceal band ligation, which is now preferred also for lower rate of complications. Endoscopic sclerotherapy has increasingly been replaced by ligation also in secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding. The studies showed that band ligation can eradicate varices in fewer sessions, re-bleeding and complications were fewer in comparison with variceal injection sclerotherapy. Because of the reduced efficacy, severe complications, and the high mortality associated with using conventional sclerosants in acute bleeding gastric varices, the technique of injecting tissue adhesives has been studied, described and used despite numerous complications. Endoscopic injection sclerotherapy of esophageal varices remains usable as an oldest method in arresting of this hemorrhage only in rare cases when the band ligation is not available.     

Endoscopic treatments for portal hypertension

Endoscopic treatments for bleeding gastroesophageal varices include injection sclerotherapy, variceal obturation with tissue adhesives, and variceal rubber band ligation. Acute injection sclerotherapy remains a quick and simple technique for the control of active bleeding from esophageal varices. Although few trials have been published so far, some evidence suggests that the early administration of vasoactive drugs (somatostatin, octreotide, or terlipressin) is safe and may increase the efficacy of endoscopic treatments. Banding ligation is the optimal endoscopic treatment for the prevention of rebleeding from esophageal varices. The use of tissue adhesives and thrombin as injectates to treat bleeding fundal gastric varices and esophageal varices not responding to vasoactive drugs or sclerotherapy is promising but needs further assessment by means of randomized controlled trials. As of today, endoscopic treatments are not recommended for the primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding.     

Injection Sclerotherapy for Esophageal Varices Associated with Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Liver Cirrhosis

Survival period, causes of death and variceal rebleeding in 20 patients with esophageal varices associated with hepatocellular carcinoma and liver cirrhosis were analyzed to evaluate the effectiveness of injection sclerotherapy. The first injection sclerotherapy successfully stopped active variceal bleeding in all seven emergency cases. These were followed up as elective cases later on. The remaining 13 patients, who had a history of variceal bleeding, were treated as elective cases from the beginning. Endoscopic evaluation of the varices was performed at intervals of six months to one year, after the first sclerotherapy, and recurrence was treated by elective sclerotherapy. 85% of the patients died within one year. Three out of 20 cases were still alive until this study was performed. But, whereas 17 patients died mainly due to hepatic failure and hepatocellular carcinoma, only one patient died due to variceal rebleeding. No deaths were observed to have been directly due to sclerotherapy or its complications. Hence we think that injection sclerotherapy should be considered one of the treatments for esophageal varices in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and liver cirrhosis.     

New techniques: combined endoscopic injection sclerotherapy and ligation for acute bleeding from gastric varices

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Combined endoscopic injection sclerotherapy and endoscopic variceal ligation was used for the treatment of acute bleeding from gastric varices. METHODOLOGY: Between July 1995 and August 1998, three cirrhotic patients with acute bleeding from gastric varices were treated. Endoscopic variceal ligation of the puncture point and bleeding point was performed simultaneously. RESULTS: Acute bleeding from the gastric varices was successfully stopped in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Combined endoscopic injection sclerotherapy and endoscopic variceal ligation can be used to stop bleeding and prevent rebleeding from gastric varices.     

Recurrence of esophageal varices following endoscopic treatment and its impact on rebleeding: comparison of sclerotherapy and ligation

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic variceal ligation is superior to sclerotherapy because of its lower rebleeding and complication rates. However, ligation is not without drawbacks due to a higher tendency to variceal recurrence. We conducted a randomized cohort study to delineate the long-term history of variceal recurrence following ligation and sclerotherapy, and to clarify the impact of recurrence on rebleeding and on the consumption of endoscopic treatment resources. METHODS: Two hundred cirrhotic patients with esophageal variceal bleeding were randomized to undergo maintenance endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy or ligation. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-one patients achieved variceal eradication and were regularly followed up for 2.2 to 6.7 (mean: 5.1 +/- 1.2) years. The demographic data, hepatic reserve, bleeding severity, and endoscopic features of both sclerotherapy (n=70) and ligation (n=71) showed no difference. Forty (57.1%) patients who underwent sclerotherapy experienced 58 recurrences of esophageal varices, in contrast to the 46 (64.8%) patients who underwent ligation and experienced 81 episodes of recurrence. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that within 2 years variceal recurrence was more frequent for ligation than sclerotherapy, and the difference decreased thereafter. Multiple recurrence appeared more common with ligation (1/2/3/4/5 episodes of recurrence: 46/23/8/3/1 vs. 40/14/3/1/0, p=0.08). On multifactorial analysis, the endoscopic treatment method and red wale markings were the two factors determining variceal recurrence. Rebleeding from recurrent esophageal varices was unusual and showed no difference between the two groups (7/58 vs. 6/81, p>0.05). Rebleeding from gastric varices was more common after eradication by sclerotherapy (7/19 vs. 1/16, p=0.085) than by ligation. The number of sessions required for eradication of recurrent varices was no different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Early recurrence and multiple recurrence of esophageal varices are more likely in patients undergoing endoscopic ligation, compared to sclerotherapy; however, the recurrence did not lead to a higher risk of rebleeding or require more endoscopic treatment.     

102例肝硬化合并食管静脉曲张出血二级预防硬化治疗分析

目的 评价硬化治疗预防食管静脉曲张再出血的疗效。方法 回顾性分析我院2010年3月—2012年2月行食管静脉曲张硬化治疗(esophageal varices sclerotherapy,EVS)二级预防的肝硬化合并食管静脉曲张出血患者102例的临床资料。102例共行EVS328例次,其中择期309例次,追加治疗19例次,首次治疗(3.0±0.8)次。对其中88例进行1～20(10.2±2.5)个月随访。结果 随访88例中,食管静脉曲张消失和基本消失率为79.5%,远期再出血率为12.5%。主要并发症为术后发热、食管注射点溃疡或糜烂出血。结论 EVS治疗食管静脉曲张出血,可明显降低再出血率。     

ENDOSCOPIC SCLEROTHERAPY FOR ESOPHAGO-GASTRIC VARICES: A CRITICAL REAPPRAISAL

Amongst the many non-surgical techniques for the treatment of variceal bleeding, endoscopic sclerotherapy (EST) has shown great promise. EST can successfully obliterate esophageal varices and prevent variceal rebleeding. It is also very effective in the control of active bleeding from esophageal varices. The technique of EST is simple and can be carried out with a conventional, forward viewing, flexible endoscope and a teflon injector. Weekly intravariceal injections of an aqueous sclerosant are prefer-rable. Though complications of EST in experienced hands are low, prophylactic EST at present should be advocated only to patients at high risk of bleeding. While controversy exists, most reports indicate that EST improves survival of patients with portal hypertension who have bled from esophageal varices. With regular follow-up endoscopics, recurrence of varices and bleeding from them can be substantially reduced. Sclerotherapy may successfully obliterate gastric varices in some patients either following EST for esophageal varices or by direct gastric variceal injections. For the long-term management of portal hypertension, combination of pharmacotherapy before as well as after eradication of esophageal varices, needs proper evaluation.     

Propranolol reduces the rebleeding rate during endoscopic sclerotherapy before variceal obliteration.

In patients treated with sclerotherapy, most rebleeding episodes are observed before variceal obliteration. This prospective randomized study aimed to assess if propranolol together with sclerotherapy could reduce the rebleeding rate before variceal obliteration. Seventy-five patients (59 male, 16 female; mean age, 54 +/- 15 years) with cirrhosis (from alcohol abuse in 91%) admitted with upper gastrointestinal bleeding, which was endoscopically proven to originate from ruptured esophageal varices, were included. After initial control of bleeding, the patients were randomized into the following two groups: group 1 treated with sclerotherapy alone (36 patients) and group 2 treated with sclerotherapy plus propranolol (39 patients). They were followed up to variceal obliteration. In group 2, 7 patients rebled as compared with 14 patients treated with sclerotherapy alone (P less than 0.005). When considering only rebleedings from esophageal varices, 4 patients rebled in group 2 vs. 10 in group 1 (P less than 0.10). The total number of rebleeding episodes was lower in group 2 than in group 1 whether considering all causes (8 vs. 17; P less than 0.07) or variceal rebleedings alone (4 vs. 13; P less than 0.01). Mean total blood requirement per patient was lower in group 2 than in group 1 (1.4 +/- 3.4 vs. 2.79 +/- 6.4 units of blood, respectively; P less than 0.01). Mortality was similar in both groups of patients (14% vs. 13% in groups 1 and 2, respectively, NS). It is concluded that patients treated with sclerotherapy should be given propranolol before variceal obliteration.     

A clinical controlled trial of endoscopic sclerotherapy for repeated esophageal variceal bleeding

Thirty-seven patients with postnecrotic cirrhosis of the liver and 13 patients with primary hepatoma were proven to have repeated bleeding from ruptured esophageal varices. Clinically controlled trials were performed by assigning patients to either sclerotherapy or control arms (25 patients each). Combined intra-variceal and para-variceal injection before an upper endoscopic examination was performed in the sclerotherapy group. In all 25 sclerotherapy cases (100%) hemostasis was successful, which was a statistically significant success rate compared to the control group (52.0%) (p less than 0.01). In the sclerotherapy group 20% (5/25 cases) developed rebleeding, which was less than the 48.0% (7 cases of continuous bleeding and 5 cases of rebleeding) of the control group (p less than 0.05). Four cases (16.0%) in the sclerotherapy group died of erosive gastritis with massive bleeding, compared to 8 fatalities (32.0%) in the control group, because of uncontrolled esophageal variceal bleeding. Endoscopic sclerotherapy is a very effective method for arresting bleeding esophageal varices, and for decreasing the rebleeding rate.     

Combined (short-term plus longterm) sclerotherapy v short-term only sclerotherapy: a randomised prospective trial.

Short term sclerotherapy (by injection(s) around the bleeding point) is used for immediate control of massive haemorrhage from oesophagogastric varices. The usefulness of longterm sclerotherapy once short term sclerotherapy has been successfully carried out was assessed. Two treatment groups were studied: 50 patients were treated by 'combined' (short term followed by longterm) sclerotherapy; 56 patients were treated by short term sclerotherapy only. Patients included in the second group were treated by short term sclerotherapy only if a variceal rebleeding was present. The overall cumulative proportion of patients rebleeding was not significantly different in either group. Combined sclerotherapy patients, however, experienced less episodes of variceal haemorrhage and the source of haemorrhage was different (p < 0.002). Combined sclerotherapy was more efficient in preventing bleeding from oesophageal bleeding points but not those arising from a junctional source (p < 0.05). A greater incidence of oesophageal rebleeding was found in those patients whose first source of bleeding was oesophageal (p < 0.05). No significant difference was detected in survival expectancy between either group. In conclusion, after short term sclerotherapy is carried out successfully, those patients with bleeding from variceal bleeding points located on oesophageal mucosa should benefit most from a longterm sclerotherapy programme.     

内镜下治疗食管-胃连通型静脉曲张的研究进展

食管胃静脉曲张破裂出血是肝硬化常见且危重的并发症之一,再出血率及病死率高,食管-胃连通型静脉曲张属于特殊类型静脉曲张,内镜下治疗方法主要包括内镜下静脉曲张硬化术、内镜下组织胶注射及联合序贯治疗等,但在具体方法的选择上还存在一些争议。现就近年来国内外食管-胃连通型静脉曲张内镜下治疗的进展予以综述。     

Endoscopic therapy for bleeding esophageal varices improves the outcome of Child C cirrhotic patients

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Bleeding from esophageal varices is one of the frequent severe complications arising in patients with liver cirrhosis. The management of esophageal varices is therefore important for patient survival. The purpose of this study was to clarify the predictive factors for mortality in patients with Child C cirrhosis presenting with variceal bleeding. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 77 Child C cirrhotic patients with bleeding from esophageal varices was conducted. All patients received endoscopic therapy. Twenty-nine patients received endoscopic variceal ligation, and 48 patients received endoscopic injection sclerotherapy or endoscopic injection sclerotherapy with ligation. Univariate and multivariate analyses of clinical data were performed to identify the prognostic factors for survival for these 77 patients. RESULTS: Fifty-seven of 77 patients received endoscopic therapy within 24 h after variceal bleeding, and bleeding was controlled in 55 (96.5%). The remaining 20 patients received endoscopic therapy more than 24 h after bleeding. Higher bilirubin level and rebleeding were the predictive parameters for 6-week survival in the 77 patients, according to univariate and multivariate analysis. Higher bilirubin level, refractory ascites, and the presence of hepatocellular carcinoma were the predictive parameters for mortality in 77 patients as determined by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic therapy was effective in controlling acute variceal bleeding of Child C cirrhotic patients. The prognosis of Child C stage patients presenting with variceal bleeding depended on the severity of liver damage and the presence of hepatocellular carcinoma.     

6 Endoscopic treatments for portal hypertension

Endoscopic treatments for bleeding gastro-oesophageal varices include injection sclerotherapy, variceal obturation with tissue adhesives and variceal rubber band ligation. Today, endoscopic treatments are not recommended for the primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding. Acute injection sclerotherapy remains a quick and simple technique for the control of active bleeding from oesophageal varices. Its efficacy may be improved by the early administration of vasoactive drugs. Banding ligation is the optimal endoscopic treatment for the prevention of rebleeding from oesophageal varices. The use of tissue adhesives and thrombin as injectates to treat bleeding fundal gastric varices and oesophageal varices not responding to vasoactive drugs or sclerotherapy is promising but needs further assessment by means of randomized controlled trials.     

地方本科院校计算机专业转型发展路径探索

当前,地方本科院校计算机专业规模大,质量和数量失衡,各专业办学定位同质化,专业特色不明显,与地方经济脱节,同时,教师专业实践能力与应用型计算机人才培养目标不匹配,重理论、轻应用,服务地方经济发展能力差。地方本科院校计算机专业实现转型发展,在结构方面需要主动融入行业和地方经济,明确专业定位,构建应用型计算机人才培养目标;在技术方面需要面向行业和地方,构建职业需求驱动的计算机人才培养体系;在制度方面需要制定和完善各种规章制度,形成专业转型发展的良好文化氛围。     

Variceal Bleeding

Opinion statement Primary prophylaxis: Patients with cirrhosis who have esophageal varices but who have never had a bleeding episode may be treated medically or endoscopically. Without treatment, approximately 30% of cirrhotic patients with varices bleed and this risk is reduced by approximately 50% with therapy. Medical therapy includes nonselective beta blockers with or without nitrates. Compliance and side effects limit efficacy. Primary prophylaxis with endoscopic sclerotherapy is not warranted because of evidence suggesting that complications outweigh benefits. Studies of endoscopic therapy with ligation (endoscopic banding) demonstrate that in select patients (those with large varices), endoscopic banding may reduce the risk of first bleeding episode when compared with propranolol. Patients with large varices may benefit from a combination of banding with nonselective beta blockers. Secondary prophylaxis: After an initial variceal bleed, the risk of a second bleed is high and therapy is warranted to reduce the risk of rebleeding. The options are similar to those for primary prophylaxis, and in addition to medical and endoscopic therapy, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) and surgical shunts are therapeutic options. The combination of endoscopic therapy with medical therapy is the initial approach to prevent variceal rebleeding. Endoscopic banding is preferred to sclerotherapy because banding is associated with lower bleeding rates and fewer complications. TIPS is useful in cases refractory to endoscopic therapy or in uncontrolled variceal hemorrhage. Surgical shunts are typically reserved for patients in whom TIPS cannot be performed for technical reasons or for well-compensated cirrhotic patients. Acute variceal bleeding: Acute bleeding from esophageal varices requires an endoscopic evaluation and therapeutic intervention. Technically, endoscopic banding may not be possible because of limited visualization from bleeding and sclerotherapy is used because it is easier to perform in this setting. A continuous intravenous drip of octreotide should be initiated if variceal bleeding is suspected. If variceal bleeding cannot be controlled, then a Minnesota tube or Sengstaken-Blakemore tube should be placed by someone with experience. TIPS is effective rescue therapy for controlling acute variceal hemorrhage in circumstances when other methods fail.     

A prospective randomized trial from Turkey comparing octreotide versus injection sclerotherapy in acute variceal bleeding

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Bleeding from gastroesophageal varices continues to be a life threatening complication of chronic liver diseases and portal hypertension. The purpose of this randomized prospective study is to compare the efficacy of octreotide administration and emergency injection sclerotherapy for the control of actively bleeding esophageal varices and prevention of early rebleeding in patients with cirrhosis. METHODOLOGY: A total of 66 episodes of endoscopically proven active variceal bleeding in 52 patients were included in this study. Following admission to the hospital, the patients were resuscitated with blood and plasma, and fiberoptic endoscopy was performed within 2 hours. Thirty-six bleeds in 28 patients and 30 bleeds in 24 patients were randomized to endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy (1% polidocanol) and to octreotide infusion (at 50 micrograms/h for 12 hours following the initial 50 micrograms i.v. bolus), respectively. RESULTS: Bleeding was initially controlled within 6 hours in 75% of episodes by endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy and in 73.3 by octreotide infusion (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in early rebleeding (within 72 hours of randomization) (22% vs. 22.7%), blood transfusion (4.2 +/- 1.8 units vs. 4.8 +/- 2.9 units), or hospital mortality (3.6% vs. 3.3%). Treatment failed in 9 episodes (25%) in the sclerotherapy group and in 8 episodes (26.7%) in the octreotide group. CONCLUSIONS: We consider that Octreotide would appear to be as effective as sclerotherapy in both the early control of variceal hemorrhage and in the prevention of early recurrent bleeding and should therefore be considered the treatment of choice in those centers where 24-hour endoscopy is not available. Furthermore, even in hospitals that do have a 24-hour endoscopy service there is good evidence that octreotide therapy should be commenced as soon as a patient enters hospital with a suspected variceal bleed to achieve rapid homeostasis. When initial hemostasis is achieved, elective endoscopic therapies can be undertaken with greater success.     

Endoscopic ligation compared with sclerotherapy for bleeding esophageal varices in children with extrahepatic portal venous obstruction

Endoscopic sclerotherapy is an effective treatment for bleeding esophageal varices, but it is associated with significant complications. Endoscopic ligation, a new form of endoscopic treatment for bleeding varices, has been shown to be superior to sclerotherapy in adult patients with cirrhosis. To determine the efficacy and safety of endoscopic sclerotherapy and ligation, the 2 methods were compared in a randomized control trial in 49 children with extrahepatic portal venous obstruction who had proven bleeding from esophageal varices. Twenty-four patients were treated with sclerotherapy and 25 with band ligation. No significant differences were found between the sclerotherapy and ligation groups in arresting active index bleeding (100% each) and achieving variceal eradication (91.7% vs. 96%, P =.61). Band ligation eradicated varices in fewer endoscopic sessions than did sclerotherapy (3.9 +/- 1.1 vs. 6.1 +/- 1.7, respectively, P <.0001). The rebleeding rate was significantly higher in the sclerotherapy group (25% vs. 4%, P =.049), as was the rate of major complications (25% vs. 4%, P =.049). After eradication, esophageal variceal recurrence was not significantly different in patients treated by ligation than by sclerotherapy (17.4% vs. 10%, P =.67). In conclusion, variceal band ligation in children is a safe and effective technique that achieves variceal eradication more quickly, with a lower rebleeding rate and fewer complications compared with sclerotherapy.     

Management of bleeding in the cirrhotic patient

Important advances have been made in the management of variceal bleeding. Despite these advances, bleeding in the patient with cirrhosis remains one of the most demanding clinical challenges that a gastroenterologist or gastrointestinal surgeon may face. The aim is to identify the source of bleeding, control active bleeding and prevent rebleeding. This requires a multidisciplinary team, and the optimal management algorithm depends on the clinical circumstance of the patient and the local availability of endoscopic, radiological and surgical expertise. Injection sclerotherapy is effective in stopping acute variceal bleeding, but has the drawback of a high incidence of complications. Endoscopic variceal ligation is just as effective, and is associated with fewer complications. An overtube allows repeated introductions of the endoscope to be more tolerable for the patient and protects the airway against aspiration of blood; its use should be encouraged in patients with massive bleeding. Newer ligators can deliver multiple bands without removal of the scope but the high cost of these disposable devices limits their widespread use. Bleeding from gastric varices is even more challenging; the treatment of choice is injection with cyanoacrylate glue. To prevent rebleeding, beta-blockers are recommended for all patients with large varices (including those which have never bled). Injection sclerotherapy or band ligation, conducted at weekly intervals after the initial control of bleeding, is equally effective at obliterating varices and decreasing the risk of further hemorrhage; band ligation results in fewer complications. Other newer treatment modalities for variceal bleeding, such as somatostatin analogs, transjugular intrahepatic portasystemic shunt and liver transplantation, offer more optimal approaches to control bleeding and prevent rebleeding, but may be prohibitively expensive. Even for the most affluent communities, affordability, cost-effectiveness, and resource rationing are important considerations in management of patients with cirrhosis complicated by gastrointestinal bleeding.