Formoterol (OXIS) Turbuhaler as a rescue therapy compared with salbutamol pMDI plus spacer in patients with acute severe asthma

Formoterol has a similar onset of effect to salbutamol but a prolonged duration of action. However, the relative efficacy of the two drugs in acute severe asthma is not known. This double-blind, double-dummy study compared the safety and efficacy of the maximum recommended daily dose of formoterol and a predicted equivalent dose of salbutamol in 88 patients presenting to the emergency department with acute severe asthma. Patients were randomized to formoterol 54 microg via Turbuhaler or salbutamol 2400 microg via pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) plus spacer in three equal doses over 1 h. Following the full dose, mean FEV1 at 75 min increased by 37% for formoterol and 28% for salbutamol (P = 0.18). The maximum increase in FEV1 over 4 h was significantly greater with formoterol compared with salbutamol (51% vs. 36%, respectively P < 0.05) and formoterol was as effective as salbutamol at improving symptoms and wellbeing. Both treatments were well tolerated. Formoterol caused a greater decrease in serum potassium (difference -0.2 mmol/l). In severe acute asthma, bronchodilator therapy with high-dose (54 microg) formoterol Turbuhaler provided equally rapid improvements in lung function of greater magnitude over 4 h than high-dose (2400 microg) salbutamol pMDI plus spacer.     

Efficacy of formoterol Turbuhaler in the emergency treatment of patients with obstructive airway diseases

Dry powder devices are rarely used in the emergency room (ER) treatment of acute and severe bronchoconstriction due to hesitations with respect to clinical efficacy. This study investigated the effects of two inhalers with formoterol in patients visiting the ER Department for acute and severe dyspnoea, mainly exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Two doses of 12mug formoterol were given at enrolment, either via Turbuhaler or via pressurised metered dose inhaler, connected to a spacer device (pMDI+S) in a double-blind way and parallel design. Another two doses of 12 microg formoterol were given after 30 min. Forced expiratory volume in the 1s (FEV(1)) and Borg dyspnoea score were assessed until 60 min. The study was designed to test non-inferiority in effects on FEV(1). Seventy-seven patients were enrolled with a mean age of 66 years and a FEV(1) of 1.03 L (39% of predicted). The effects of the two treatments were almost identical. The mean improvement in FEV(1) at 60 min after formoterol Turbuhaler was 94% of the improvement after formoterol pMDI+S. A statistically significant non-inferiority was shown (p=0.037) at 60 min (primary endpoint) as well as at 5 and 30 min (secondary endpoints, p=0.0043 and 0.013, respectively). Improvements in the Borg dyspnoea score and other lung-function parameters did not differ significantly between the two devices. In conclusion, formoterol Turbuhaler was equally effective as formoterol pMDI+S in the treatment of acute bronchoconstriction within the ER.     

Oxis (formoterol given by Turbuhaler) showed as rapid an onset of action as salbutamol given by a pMDI

Thirty-six adult patients (16 women) with mild to moderate asthma with a mean baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) of 73.8% (46-106%) of predicted normal value and mean reversibility of 24.2% (14.6-47.1%) were included in this double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, placebo-controlled and cross-over study. The patients inhaled single doses 4.5 or 9 microg of formoterol (Oxis) via Turbuhaler salbutamol (Ventolin) 100 or 200 microg from a pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) or placebo at five randomized visits. Efficacy was measured by FEV1 pre-dose and then 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 min after inhalation of the study drug. The primary variable of efficacy was the FEV1-value 3 min after dose intake. No statistically significant differences were found between active treatments. All active treatments gave a higher bronchodilating effect at 3 min than placebo: 10.0, 11.4% for salbutamol 100 and 200 microg and 11.7, 11.8% for formoterol 4.5 and 9 microg (P<0.001 in all cases). There was a correlation between the measured response at 3 min and the subjective experience of the patients. The relative difference vs. placebo remained throughout the study period for all active treatments except for low dose salbutamol. All treatments were well tolerated. In conclusion, formoterol Turbuhaler has as rapid an onset of action as salbutamol pMDI when given at recommended doses.     

Efficacy and safety of budesonide/formoterol compared with salbutamol in the treatment of acute asthma

This study compared the efficacy and safety of budesonide/formoterol (Symbicort) Turbuhaler)) with salbutamol pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) with spacer for relief of acute bronchoconstriction in patients with asthma. In this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study, patients (n = 104 allocated to treatment; n = 103 received treatment; mean age 45 years) seeking medical attention for acute asthma (mean FEV(1) 43% of predicted) received two doses repeated at t = -5 and 0 min of either budesonide/formoterol (320/9 microg, two inhalations) or salbutamol (100 microg x eight inhalations); total doses 1280/36 microg and 1600 microg, respectively. All patients received prednisolone 60 mg at 90 min and FEV(1) was assessed over 3h. FEV(1) 90 min after dosing (primary variable) increased compared with pre-dose FEV(1) by an average of 30% and 32% for budesonide/formoterol and salbutamol, respectively (P = 0.66), with similar increases at all timepoints from 3 to 180 min for both groups. Mean pulse rate over 3h was significantly higher in the salbutamol group versus the budesonide/formoterol group (92 vs. 88 bpm; P < 0.01). No treatment differences were seen for other vital signs, including ECG. High-dose budesonide/formoterol was effective and well tolerated for the treatment of acute asthma, with rapid onset of efficacy and a safety profile over 3h similar to high-dose salbutamol.     

The efficacy of a new salbutamol metered-dose powder inhaler in comparison with two other inhaler devices

An open cross-over and randomized study was carried out in order to compare the efficacy and safety of inhaled salbutamol delivered from a new 50 microg dose(-1) metered-dose dry powder inhaler Taifun, and a commercially available 50 microg dose(-1) dry powder inhaler Turbuhaler, and a conventional 100 microg dose(-1) pressurized metered-dose inhaler with a spacer (pMDI+S). Twenty-one patients, aged 21-70 years, with stable asthma and with demonstrated reversibility upon inhalation of salbutamol were included in the study. On three separate study days, the patients received a total dose of 400 microg of salbutamol from the dry powder inhalers and a dose of 800 microg from the pMDI+S in a cumulative fashion: 1,1, 2 and 4 doses at 30 min intervals. The percent change in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1), was used as the primary efficacy variable. Salbutamol inhaled via the Taifun produced greater bronchodilation than the other devices. The difference in percent change in FEV1 between the Taifun and the other devices was statistically significant at the two first dose levels, but diminished towards the higher doses when the plateau of the dose-response curve was reached. The estimated relative dose potency of the Taifun was approximately 1.9- and 2.8-fold compared to the Turbuhaler and the pMDI+S, respectively. The Taifun caused a slight, but clinically insignificant, decrease in serum potassium concentration. There were no significant changes in the other safety parameters (blood pressure, heart rate and electrocardiogram recordings) with any of the used devices. In conclusion, this study indicates that salbutamol inhaled via the Taifun is more potentthan salbutamol inhaled from the other devices tested. In practise, a smaller total dose of salbutamol from theTaifun is needed to produce a similar bronchodilatory response. All treatments were equally well tolerated.     

Formoterol Turbuhaler 4.5 microg (delivered dose) has a rapid onset and 12-h duration of bronchodilation

Clinical trials show that formoterol (Oxis) Turbuhaler 4.5 microg delivered dose (6 microg metered dose) has a rapid onset of bronchodilation similar to that of salbutamol and a 12-h duration of action. Maximum increase in FEV(1) and duration of bronchodilation are dose-dependent, the 4.5 microg dose being the lowest dose tested giving both effects.Clinical studies investigating onset of bronchodilation show a significant increase in specific airway conductance occurring within 1 min after inhalation of formoterol Turbuhaler 4.5 microg. When measured from 3-20 min after inhalation, formoterol Turbuhaler 4.5 microg showed similar increases in FEV(1) to salbutamol administered via pMDI. No difference in onset of bronchodilation was observed between the formoterol Turbuhaler 4.5 and 9 microg doses.Single-dose studies and studies of 1-12 weeks' duration show that formoterol Turbuhaler 4.5 microg produces a significant and clinically important mean bronchodilating effect for > or =12 h after inhalation. In the cited studies no significant differences in duration of bronchodilation were observed between the formoterol Turbuhaler 4.5 and 9 microg doses.Conclusion: clinical data show that formoterol Turbuhaler 4.5 microg is an effective dose in patients with asthma, with a rapid onset of bronchodilation and a duration of at least 12 h.     

Beclomethasone/formoterol versus budesonide/formoterol combination therapy in asthma.

The present study was designed to compare the fixed combination of beclomethasone and formoterol in a hydrofluoroalkane Modulite (Chiesi Farmaceutici, Parma, Italy) pressurised metered-dose inhaler (pMDI), with a combination of budesonide and formoterol administered via a Turbuhaler (AstraZeneca, Lund, Sweden) dry powder inhaler (DPI). This was a phase III, multinational, multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, two-arm parallel groups, controlled study design. After a 2-week run-in period, 219 patients with moderate-to-severe asthma were randomised to a 12-week treatment with beclomethasone 200 microg plus formoterol 12 microg b.i.d. delivered via a pMDI or budesonide 400 microg plus formoterol 12 microg b.i.d. delivered via a DPI. The analysis of noninferiority on primary outcome, morning peak expiratory flow in the last 2 weeks of treatment, showed no difference between groups. A statistically significant improvement from baseline in lung function, symptoms and rescue medication use was observed in both groups at all time-points. No differences were observed between treatments in either rate of asthma exacerbations or frequency of adverse events. The new fixed combination of beclomethasone and formoterol in hydrofluoroalkane Modulite pressurised metered-dose inhaler is equivalent to the marketed combination of budesonide and formoterol in terms of efficacy and tolerability profile.     

Relative therapeutic index between inhaled formoterol and salbutamol in asthma patients

A double-blind, randomized crossover study in 28 asthmatic patients assessed the relative therapeutic index for inhaled formoterol and salbutamol. Pre-drug administration FEV1 (mean 2.08 l) was 49-93% of predicted and reversibility 16-82% after inhalation of salbutamol. Patients inhaled single doses of formoterol (Oxis) (4.5,18 and 54 microg, delivered doses) via Turbuhaler, salbutamol (Ventolin) (200 and 1800 microg) via pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) and placebo at intervals of 48 h or more. Individual maximum FEV1 and minimum S-K+ were calculated. Relative local (maximum FEV1) and systemic (minimum S-K+) dose potencies, and their ratio, the relative therapeutic index, were estimated using a non-linear mixed effect model. The drug effects were well tolerated and dose dependent. A log-linear approximation was used to describe the bronchodilatory effect, whereas a sigmoid approximation was more apt to describe the decrease in serum potassium concentration. A bivariate dose-response model based on these principles was fitted simultaneously to all data. The mean relative therapeutic index between formoterol 4.5-54 microg given via Turbuhaler and salbutamol 200-1800 microg given via pMDI was estimated to be 2.5 in favour of formoterol; this trend was not statistically significant.     

Onset of action of single doses of formoterol administered via Turbuhaler in patients with stable COPD

We studied 16 patients with stable COPD in a double blind, double dummy, placebo-controlled, within patient study to see if formoterol could be used as a rescue drug. We compared the of onset of bronchodilation obtained with formoterol 12 microg (metered dose corresponding to 9 microg delivered dose) and formoterol 24 microg (metered dose corresponding to 18 microg delivered dose), both delivered via Turbuhaler, with that of salbutamol 400 microg and salbutamol 800 microg delivered via pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI). Patients inhaled single doses of placebo, formoterol and salbutamol on five separate days. FEV1 was measured in baseline condition and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 30, 40, 50, and 60 min after inhalation of each treatment. We examined two separate criteria for deciding if a response was greater than that expected by a random variation of the measurement: (1) a rise in FEV1 of at least 15% from the baseline value; (2) an absolute increase in FEV1 of at least 200 ml. Formoterol 12 microg (15.2 min; 95% CI 9.5-21.0) and formoterol 24 microg (15.1 min; 95% CI 8.9-21.2) caused a rise in FEV1 of at least 15% from the baseline value almost rapidly as salbutamol 400 microg (13.6 min; 95% CI 7.1-20.1) and salbutamol 800 microg (14.5 min; 95% CI 7.1-21.9). No significant difference (P=0.982) in onset of action was seen between the four active treatments. According to Criterion 2, the mean time to 200 ml increase in FEV1 was 11.1 min (95% CI: 7.0-15.2) after salbutamol 400 microg, 13.0 min (95% CI: 7.9-18.1) after salbutamol 800 microg, 14.7 min (95% CI: 7.1-22.4) after formoterol 12 microg, and 12.7 min (95% CI: 7.4-18.0) after formoterol 24 microg. Again, there was no significant difference (P= 0.817) between the four active treatments. Formoterol Turbuhaler 12 microg and 24 microg caused bronchodilation as rapidly as salbutamol 400 microg and 800 microg given via pMDI.     

Bronchodilator response to albuterol after regular formoterol and effects of acute corticosteroid administration

BACKGROUND: There is controversy about the development of bronchodilator subsensitivity after regular administration of long-acting beta(2)-agonists. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study was to evaluate whether regular treatment with formoterol affects the bronchodilator response to repeated puffs of albuterol, and also to assess the effects of acute administration of a bolus dose of IV or inhaled corticosteroid. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve patients (mean [SD] age, 43 [15] years; FEV(1), 57 [17] % predicted) with stable, moderate to severe persistent asthma who were all taking inhaled corticosteroids were evaluated in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover study. Patients received treatments each for 2 weeks followed by a bolus (IV/inhaled) of corticosteroid or placebo: (1) placebo inhaler bid + bolus placebo; (2) formoterol Turbuhaler 24 microg metered dosage bid (delivered dosage 18 microg bid) + placebo; (3) formoterol 24 microg bid + bolus IV hydrocortisone, 200 mg; or (4) formoterol 24 microg bid + bolus inhaled budesonide, 1,600 microg. Bronchodilator response to repeated puffs of albuterol (200 to 1,600 microg) for > 80 min was measured at 2 h after bolus administration of placebo or corticosteroid. The study was powered at the 80% level to detect a 20% difference in area under curve between 20 and 80 min (AUC) for FEV(1) response to albuterol as change from baseline (primary end point). RESULTS: There was significant subsensitivity (p = 0.01) of the mean albuterol FEV(1) response (as AUC, L x s) after formoterol alone (737) as compared to placebo (1,453) along with partial reversal by steroid administration: formoterol + hydrocortisone (1, 050), and formoterol + budesonide (942). There was a similar pattern of subsensitivity (p = 0.03) for the mean albuterol forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of vital capacity response (as AUC, L): placebo (2,149), formoterol alone (1,002), formoterol + hydrocortisone (1,402), and formoterol + budesonide (1,271). CONCLUSION: Regular treatment with formoterol produced significant bronchodilator subsensitivity to repeated puffs of albuterol, which was partially reversed by a bolus dose of systemic or inhaled corticosteroid.     

Formoterol as relief medication in asthma: a worldwide safety and effectiveness trial.

The aim of the study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of as-needed formoterol with salbutamol in a large international real-life asthma study. Children and adults (n=18,124) were randomised to 6 months as-needed treatment with open-label formoterol 4.5 microg Turbuhaler or salbutamol 200 microg pressurised metered dose inhaler or equivalent. Primary safety variables were asthma-related and nonasthma-related serious adverse events (SAE)s and adverse events (AE)s resulting in discontinuation (DAE)s. The primary efficacy variable was time to first asthma exacerbation. The incidences of AEs, SAEs and DAEs arising from SAEs were not significantly different between treatments. DAEs for nonserious AEs were higher with formoterol. Asthma-related AEs decreased with formoterol (1,098 (12.3%) versus 1,206 (13.5%)), asthma-related SAEs were similar (108 (1.2%) versus 121 (1.4%)) but more asthma-related DAEs occurred in the formoterol group (89 (1.0%) versus 48 (0.5%)). Time to first exacerbation was prolonged (hazard ratio 0.86) and less as-needed and maintenance medication was used with formoterol. Reductions of exacerbations with as-needed formoterol versus salbutamol increased with increasing age and asthma medication level. This real-life study demonstrates that formoterol as-needed has a similar safety profile to salbutamol, and its use as a reliever therapy is associated with fewer asthma symptoms and exacerbations.     

High-Dose Inhaled Budesonide May Substitute for Oral Therapy After an Acute Asthma Attack

Patients attending the emergency room with acute asthma, participating in a study comparing salbutamol (albuterol in the United States) via a dry powder inhaler (Turbuhaler®) with pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI), were included in this 1-week follow-up study with the aim of assessing whether inhaled budesonide via Turbuhaler may be an alternative to prednisolone tablets after an acute asthma attack. Eighty-one patients with a mean age of 38 years and forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV₁) of 64% predicted normal value after treatment with salbutamol were randomized in this double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study. The doses given were budesonide 1600 μg b.i.d. or prednisolone in daily doses from 40 mg (day 1) decreased to 5 mg (day 7). FEV₁ was recorded before and after the 7-day treatments and peak expiratory flow (PEF) morning and evening, clinical symptoms (visual analogue scale 0-100), and doses of rescue medication (terbutalineTurbuhaler 0.25 mg/dose) were recorded daily. The mean increase in FEV, from baseline to day 7 was 1 7.3% in the budesonide Turbuhaler group and 1 7.6% in the prednisolone group. Mean values of morning PEF increased from day 1 to day 7 by 67 L/min in the budesonide Turbuhaler group and by 57 L/min in the prednisolone group (not significant). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in clinical symptoms and in the number of doses of rescue medication. Because of disease deterioration, five patients in the Turbuhaler group and three in the prednisolone group needed additional symptomatic as well as corticosteroid treatment. Inhaled budesonide in high doses may be a substitute for oral therapy as follow-up treatment after an acute asthma attack.     

Comparable long-term safety and efficacy of a novel budesonide/formoterol pressurized metered-dose inhaler versus budesonide/formoterol Turbuhaler in adolescents and adults with asthma

Budesonide/formoterol in one inhaler is an established therapy for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The long-term safety and efficacy profile of a novel hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) formulation of budesonide/formoterol was compared with that of budesonide/formoterol in a dry powder inhaler (DPI; Turbuhaler). This multinational, 52-week, randomized, open, parallel-group study included patients aged > or = 12 years with asthma who had a forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1)> or = 50% of predicted normal; all patients used inhaled corticosteroids (400-1200 microg/day) and needed additional short-acting beta 2-agonist therapy. Patients were randomized to receive budesonide/formoterol pMDI or DPI 160/4.5 microg, two inhalations twice daily. Safety endpoints included assessment of adverse events and laboratory parameters. Efficacy endpoints included change from baseline in FEV1 and time to first severe asthma exacerbation. Overall, 673 patients (446pMDI, 227DPI) were included. There were no clinically significant differences between treatment groups in the nature, incidence or severity of adverse events or laboratory parameters. The number of patients experiencing adverse events was comparable in the pMDI (332/446 [74%]) and DPI (175/227 [77%]) groups; the most commonly reported adverse event was upper respiratory tract infection. The proportion of patients discontinuing as a result of adverse events was low in both groups (pMDI 12/446 [3%], DPI 2/227 [1%]). Lung function was improved to a similar extent in both groups and there was no detectable difference in time to first severe asthma exacerbation. The novel HFA pMDI formulation of budesonide/formoterol is an equally well tolerated and effective treatment for adults and adolescents with asthma as the budesonide/formoterol DPI.     

Rapid onset of bronchodilation in COPD: a placebo-controlled study comparing formoterol (Foradil Aerolizer) with salbutamol (Ventodisk)

Formoterol fumarate is a beta2-agonist bronchodilator that combines a fast onset of action with a long duration of action. Its fast onset of action is well documented in asthma but has not been directly compared with that of salbutamol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted to assess the bronchodilatory effects over the first 3 h after inhalation of single doses of formoterol 24 microg delivered via the Aerolizer dry powder inhaler device (double-blind), or salbutamol 400 microg delivered by a Diskhaler dry powder inhaler (single-blind) in patients with COPD. A total of 24 patients with COPD were randomized [mean age 61.6 +/- 7.8 years, mean forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) 1.38 +/- 0.32 l and 45.8 +/- 9.6% of predicted]. Inhalation of formoterol or salbutamol resulted in similar increases in FEV from 0 to 3 h post-dose. Both drugs produced similar bronchodilation by 5 min, which became almost maximal by 30 min. The primary efficacy variable, the area under the curve (AUC) of the FEV increase above predose baseline from 0 to 30 min (AUC(0-30 min)), demonstrated significant effects for formoterol (mean 5.89 +/- 4.67 l min(-1)), and salbutamol (mean 6.06 +/- 4.34 l min(-1)), which were not statistically different from each other but statistically significantly higher (P<0.0001) than that observed with placebo (-0.32 +/- 2.59 l min(-1)). In addition, both formoterol and salbutamol produced similar and rapid increases in forced vital capacity (FVC). In summary, this study confirms the rapid onset of action of formoterol and indicates that the onset of action of formoterol and salbutamol are similar in patients with COPD.     

Improved lung function and symptom control with formoterol on demand in asthma.

Many asthma patients remain symptomatic despite maintenance therapy with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and salbutamol as rescue medication. In the present study the relative efficacy and preference for as-needed formoterol compared with salbutamol was examined. In total, 211 patients with a mean age of 45 yrs (mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 77% predicted normal), using ICS, were randomised to 3 weeks' double-blind treatment with as-needed formoterol 4.5 microg Turbuhaler and with as-needed salbutamol 100 mug Turbuhaler in a cross-over fashion. Overall, lung function and symptom control were better with as-needed formoterol than with as-needed salbutamol. During as-needed formoterol treatment daytime and night-time symptom scores were lower, peak expiratory flow and FEV1 were higher and patients experienced fewer disturbed nights (34%) compared with as-needed salbutamol. Patients preferred the formoterol treatment to salbutamol. Of the 162 patients expressing a preference, formoterol was preferred by 68% (95% confidence interval: 60-75). Subjective assessment of effectiveness also favoured formoterol, which was perceived as slightly faster acting than salbutamol. In conclusion, as-needed formoterol improved symptoms and lung function compared with salbutamol and was perceived as more effective and at least as fast acting for symptom relief.     

High-Dose Inhaled Budesonide May Substitute for Oral Therapy After an Acute Asthma Attack

Patients attending the emergency room with acute asthma, participating in a study comparing salbutamol (albuterol in the United States) via a dry powder inhaler (Turbuhaler®) with pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI), were included in this 1-week follow-up study with the aim of assessing whether inhaled budesonide via Turbuhaler may be an alternative to prednisolone tablets after an acute asthma attack. Eighty-one patients with a mean age of 38 years and forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV₁) of 64% predicted normal value after treatment with salbutamol were randomized in this double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study. The doses given were budesonide 1600 μg b.i.d. or prednisolone in daily doses from 40 mg (day 1) decreased to 5 mg (day 7). FEV₁ was recorded before and after the 7-day treatments and peak expiratory flow (PEF) morning and evening, clinical symptoms (visual analogue scale 0–100), and doses of rescue medication (terbutalineTurbuhaler 0.25 mg/dose) were recorded daily. The mean increase in FEV, from baseline to day 7 was 1 7.3% in the budesonide Turbuhaler group and 1 7.6% in the prednisolone group. Mean values of morning PEF increased from day 1 to day 7 by 67 L/min in the budesonide Turbuhaler group and by 57 L/min in the prednisolone group (not significant). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in clinical symptoms and in the number of doses of rescue medication. Because of disease deterioration, five patients in the Turbuhaler group and three in the prednisolone group needed additional symptomatic as well as corticosteroid treatment. Inhaled budesonide in high doses may be a substitute for oral therapy as follow-up treatment after an acute asthma attack.     

Effects of formoterol and ipratropium bromide in COPD: a 3-month placebo-controlled study.

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of formoterol, ipratropium bromide and a placebo on walking distance, lung function, symptoms and quality of life (QoL) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. A total of 183 patients (mean age 64 yrs, 86 female) with moderate-to-severe nonreversible COPD participated in this randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study. After a 2-week placebo run-in, patients were randomised to formoterol Turbuhaler 18 microg b.i.d. (delivered dose), ipratropium bromide 80 microg t.i.d. via a pressurised metered dose inhaler, or placebo for 12 weeks. Inhaled short-acting beta2-agonists were allowed as relief medication and inhaled glucocorticosteroids were allowed at a constant dose. The primary variable was walking distance in the shuttle walking test (SWT). Baseline mean SWT distance was 325 m, mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was 40% predicted. Clinically significant improvements in SWT (>30 m) were seen in 41, 38 and 30% of formoterol, ipratropium and placebo patients, respectively (not significant). Mean increases from run-in were 19, 17 and 5 m in the formoterol, ipratropium and placebo groups, respectively. Both active treatments significantly improved FEV1, forced vital capacity, peak expiratory flow and daytime dyspnoea score compared with placebo. Formoterol reduced relief medication use compared with placebo. Neither active treatment improved QoL. Formoterol and ipratropium improved airway function and symptoms, without significant improvements in the shuttle walking test.     

Safety and tolerability of high-dose formoterol (Aerolizer) and salbutamol (pMDI) in patients with mild/moderate, persistent asthma

This double-blind, double-dummy, crossover study evaluated the tolerability of high-dose formoterol and salbutamol. Sixteen adults with mild/moderate persistent asthma (FEV1 > or = 70% predicted) were randomized to receive either formoterol 36 microg three times daily (TID) at 5-h intervals via Aerolizer (total daily dose 108 microg), or salbutamol 600 microg TID via pressurized metered-dose inhaler (total daily dose 1800 microg) for 3 consecutive days. After a 3-7-day washout period patients received the other treatment. FEV1 was measured 15 min pre-dose and 2 h post-dose. Both formoterol and salbutamol were associated with decreased plasma potassium (mean of minimum values: 3.4 and 3.6 mmol/L, respectively; P<0.001), increased serum glucose (mean of maximum values: 8.3 and 7.9 mmol/L, respectively; P=0.021), and small increases in mean QTc interval (mean of maximum values: 428.8 and 417.4 ms, respectively; P<0.001). However, none of these effects was clinically significant. Both treatments increased FEV1 to a mean maximum of 4.6 L (P=0.613), but the mean FEV1 AUC(0-72)h for formoterol was significantly greater than for salbutamol (302.2 L h, vs. 277.4 L h; P<0.001). No patients discontinued due to treatment-related adverse events. High-dose formoterol via Aerolizer did not produce any clinically significant systemic effects in patients with mild/moderate asthma.     

Total reversibility testing as indicator of the clinical efficacy of formoterol in COPD

RATIONALE: The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines recommend bronchodilator reversibility testing to guide treatment decisions. This study evaluated the relationship between the change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) with salbutamol or formoterol and the clinical effects of a 4-week formoterol (Foradil) treatment. METHODS: At Visit 1, patients (n = 448) with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease took an FEV1 reversibility test using 200 microg salbutamol via a metered dose inhaler. At Visit 2 (Day 0), an FEV1 reversibility test was performed using formoterol via a dry-powder inhaler (Aerolizer). Patients then received formoterol 12 microg twice daily until Visit 3 (Day 21-30), when a further formoterol FEV1 reversibility test was performed. Clinical parameters included FEV1, symptom questionnaires and rescue medication use. RESULTS: There was no significant relationship between the immediate change in FEV1 with salbutamol and the absolute change from baseline in FEV1, symptom scores or rescue medication use after a 4-week formoterol treatment. Relative immediate change in FEV1 with formoterol was correlated with change in rescue medication use (P = 0.02) and FEV1 at Visit 3 (P < 0.001). Total reversibility in FEV1 with formoterol (post-dose Visit 3-pre-dose Visit 2) was correlated with all treatment efficacy variables (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Immediate salbutamol reversibility testing, as performed under these study conditions, failed to predict the clinical efficacy of formoterol. Total reversibility after 4 weeks of formoterol treatment may be a better predictor of clinical benefits of long-term bronchodilator therapy.     

Relief of dyspnoea by beta2-agonists after methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction

Virtually all asthma patients use brorichodilators. Formoterol and salbutamol have a rapid onset of bronchodilating effect, whereas salmeterol acts slower. We studied the onset of improvement of dyspnoea sensation after inhalation with these bronchodilators and placebo to reverse a methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction as a model for an acute asthma attack. Seventeen patients with asthma completed this randomised, double-blind, crossover, double-dummy study. On 4 test days, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and Borg score were recorded and patients were challenged with methacholine until FEV1 fell with > or = 30% of baseline value. Thereafter, formoterol 12 microg via Turbuhaler, salbutamol 50 microg via Turbuhaler, salmeterol 50 microg via Diskhaler, or placebo was inhaled. FEV1 and Borg scores were assessed during the following 60 min. The first sensed improvement of Borg score was significantly (P<0.05) faster achieved with formoterol (geometric mean (Gmean) (range) 1.5 (1-40) min) and salbutamol 1.8 (1-10) min than with salmeterol 4.5 (1-30) min and placebo 3.4 (1-40) min. The Borg score returned significantly faster to the baseline value with formoterol, salbutamol, and salmeterol (Gmean time 13.8 (1-75), 13.4 (1-60), and 18.0 (1-75) min, respectively) than with placebo (33.6 (1-75 min). Formoterol and salbutamol act significantly faster than salmeterol in relieving dyspnoea induced by methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction, in patients with asthma.