Major Osteoporotic to Hip Fracture Ratios in Canadian Men and Women With Swedish Comparisons: A Population‐Based Analysis |
| |
Authors: | Anna Lam William D Leslie Lisa M Lix Marina Yogendran Suzanne N Morin Sumit R Majumdar |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada;2. McGill University, Montreal, Canada;3. University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada |
| |
Abstract: | Fracture Risk Assessment (FRAX) tools are calibrated from country‐specific fracture epidemiology. Although hip fracture data are usually available, data on non‐hip fractures for most countries are often lacking. In such cases, rates are often estimated by assuming similar non‐hip to hip fracture ratios from historical (1987 to 1996) Swedish data. Evidence that countries share similar fracture ratios is limited. Using data from Manitoba, Canada (2000 to 2007, population 1.2 million), we identified 21,850 incident major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) in men and women aged >50 years. Population‐based age‐ and sex‐specific ratios of clinical vertebral, forearm, and humerus fractures to hip fractures were calculated, along with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All ratios showed decreasing trends with increasing age for both men and women. Men and women showed similar vertebral/hip fracture ratios (all p > 0.1, with ORs 0.86 to 1.25). Forearm/hip and humerus/hip fracture ratios were significantly lower among men than women (forearm/hip ratio: p < 0.01 for all age groups, with ORs 0.29 to 0.53; humerus/hip ratio: p < 0.05 for all age groups [except 80 to 84 years] with ORs 0.46 to 0.86). Ratios for any MOF/hip fracture were also significantly lower among men than women in all but two subgroups (p < 0.05 for all age groups [except 80 to 84 and 90+ years] with ORs 0.48 to 0.87). Swedish vertebral/hip fracture ratios were similar to the Canadian fracture ratios (within 7%) but significantly lower for other sites (men and women: 46% and 35% lower for forearm/hip ratios, 19% and 15% lower for humerus/hip ratios, and 19% and 23% lower for any MOF/hip ratios). These differences have implications for updating and calibrating FRAX tools, fracture risk estimation, and intervention rates. Moreover, wherever possible, it is important that countries try to collect accurate non‐hip fracture data. © 2014 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research |
| |
Keywords: | OSTEOPOROSIS EPIDEMIOLOGY GENERAL POPULATION STUDIES DXA FRACTURE RISK ASSESSMENT |
|
|