首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

智能平台下的急诊分诊系统对多发伤患者的急救价值
引用本文:张欣雨 钱晓菁. 智能平台下的急诊分诊系统对多发伤患者的急救价值[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(21): 3037-3040. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2022.21.015
作者姓名:张欣雨 钱晓菁
作者单位:无锡市第二人民医院急诊科,无锡 214000
基金项目:江苏省自然科学基金项目(BK20191429)
摘    要:目的 探究智能平台下的急诊分诊系统对多发伤患者的急救价值。方法 以前瞻性研究对无锡市第二人民医院自2020年1月至2022年1月抽取的140例多发伤患者作为研究对象,按照随机分组法分为两组,各70例。对照组男52例,女18例,年龄(52.51±5.67)岁,采取常规分诊护理。观察组男53例,女17例,年龄(52.11±5.04)岁,应用智能平台下的急诊分诊系统护理。对比两组患者在干预后急救情况、抢救效率及抢救过程当中形成的不良事件发生率。统计学方法采用t检验、χ2检验。结果 对照组急救时间、预警时间、静脉通道建立时间及分诊评估时间均高于观察组,差异均有统计学意义(t=2.417、2.399、3.049、2.585,均P<0.05);观察组抢救启动、开放静脉通道、气道清理、呼吸支持、标本送检时间均优于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(t=2.066、2.098、3.373、2.597、3.247,均P<0.05);观察组不良事件发生率为7.14%(5/70),低于对照组[18.57%(13/70)],差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.080,P=0.043)。结论 针对存在多发伤患者采取智能平台下的急诊分诊系统护理,可有效提升患者的急救时间,提高抢救效率,降低不良事件发生率,利于患者快速预后,值得各个科室借鉴采纳。

关 键 词:智能平台  急诊分诊系统  护理干预  多发伤患者  急救价值  
收稿时间:2022-07-05

First aid value of emergency triage system based on intelligent platformfor patients with multiple injuries
Zhang Xinyu,Qian Xiaojing. First aid value of emergency triage system based on intelligent platformfor patients with multiple injuries[J]. International Medicine & Health Guidance News, 2022, 28(21): 3037-3040. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2022.21.015
Authors:Zhang Xinyu  Qian Xiaojing
Affiliation:Emergency Department, Wuxi Second People's Hospital, Wuxi 214000, China
Abstract:Objective To explore the first aid value of emergency triage system underintelligent platform for patients with multiple injuries. Methods One hundred and forty patients with multiple injuries treated in WuxiSecond People's Hospital from January 2020 to January 2022 were selected as theresearch objects, and were randomly divided into a control group and anobservation group, with 70 cases in each group. There were 52 males and 18females in the control group, and they were (52.51±5.67) years old. There were53 males and 17 females in the observation group, and they were (52.11±5.04)years old. The control group received routine triage nursing, and theobservation group received emergency triage system nursing under theintelligent platform. The first aid situations, rescue efficiencies, and theincidences, of adverse events formed in the rescue process of the two groupswere compared. t and χ2 tests were applied. Results The emergency treatment time, early warningtime, venous channel establishment time, and triage evaluation time in thecontrol group were significantly longer than those in the observation group,with statistical differences (t=2.417,2.399, 3.049, and 2.585; all P<0.05).The observation group was better than the control group in rescue initiation,opening venous channels, airway cleaning, respiratory support, and specimensubmission for examination, with statistical differences (t=2.066, 2.098, 3.373, 2.597, and 3.247; all P<0.05). The incidence of adverse events in the observationgroup was lower than that in the control group [7.14% (5/70) vs. 18.57%(13/70)], with a statistical difference (χ2=4.080, P=0.043). Conclusion The emergency triage system nursing under the intelligent platform forpatients with multiple injuries can effectively improve their first aid timeand the rescue efficiency, reduce the incidence of adverse events, andfacilitate their rapid prognosis, so it is worthy of reference and adoption byall departments.
Keywords:Intelligent platform  Emergency triage system  Nursing intervention  Patients with multiple injuries  First aid value  
点击此处可从《国际医药卫生导报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《国际医药卫生导报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号