| 新冠肺炎疫情期间北京市某片区社区防控人员心理状况分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 孙帅,王丽芹,罗松,安连杰,周伟,黄伟,樊茹,王焕弟. 新冠肺炎疫情期间北京市某片区社区防控人员心理状况分析[J]. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2020, 38(6): 563. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2020.06.003 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 孙帅 王丽芹 罗松 安连杰 周伟 黄伟 樊茹 王焕弟 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1.解放军总医院京南医疗区, 北京 100071 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 军兵种联合应对新冠肺炎疫情护理融合协作工作模式研究项目TKTJKY2020014 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的 调查新冠肺炎疫情期间北京市社区防控人员心理状况，为及时进行相关心理干预提供依据。
方法 利用焦虑自评量表SAS与自制的符合人口学特征的问卷调查表，通过“问卷星”软件，分别于2020年2月1日、3月2日两次对191名、257名来自北京市部分社区新冠肺炎疫情防控人员的焦虑心理进行线上调查，比较、分析两次调查结果及影响心理状况的可能原因。
结果 2月初，社区疫情防控人员的SAS评分为（34.36±5.71）分，明显高于中国成人常模的（29.78±10.07）分，差异有统计学意义（P < 0.05）。3月初社区疫情防控人员的SAS评分为（30.57±4.29）分，与中国成人常模比较，差异无统计学意义（P > 0.05）。3月初人群SAS评分、焦虑检出率均低于2月初，差异有统计学意义（P < 0.05）。多元线性回归分析结果显示:不受家庭支持人员的SAS评分比家庭非常支持人员增加了4.787分（P < 0.05）；相比不担心被感染人员，偶尔担心、非常担心被感染人员的SAS家庭分别增加了0.713、2.042分（P < 0.05）。3月初，不同人口学特征社区疫情防控人员SAS评分差异无统计学意义（P > 0.05）。
结论 新冠肺炎疫情期间，随着确诊人数的攀升，社区疫情防控人员均有一定的焦虑心理；但随着疫情的遏制与及时的心理干预，社区疫情防控人员的心理状况基本恢复正常。关注防控人员家庭支持情况，并进行人文关怀，可有效减少防控人员的焦虑心理。
|
| 关 键 词： | 新型冠状病毒肺炎 社区 疫情防控人员 焦虑心理 |
| 收稿时间： | 2020-06-17 |
Investigation on psychological status of community epidemic prevention and control personnel in Beijing during the outbreak of COVID 19 |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective To investigate the psychological status of community epidemic prevention and control personnel in Beijing community during the epidemic period of COVID 19, and provide the basis for timely psychological intervention. Methods The "Questionnaire Star" online evaluation method was adopted. The anxiety self-assessment scale SAS and the self-made demographic survey questionnaires were conducted among 191 and 257 community epidemic prevention and control personnel on February 1st and March 2nd, 2020, respectively, and the results of the two evaluations were compared and the possible causes were analyzed. Results At the beginning of February, the SAS score of community epidemic prevention and control personnel (34.36 ±5.71) was significantly higher than that of Chinese adult norm (29.78 ±10.07), and the difference was statistically significant(P < 0.05). At the beginning of March, the SAS score of community epidemic prevention and control personnel was (30.57 ±4.29)and there was no significant difference with Chinese adult norm (P > 0.05). SAS score and anxiety detection rate in early March were lower than those in early February, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The results of multiple linear regression analysis showed that SAS score of personnel without family support increased by 4.787 points (P < 0.05);the SAS score of personnel who occasionally worried and/or very worried about being infected increased by 0.713 and 2.042 points respectively (P < 0.05), compared with personnel who did not worry about being infected. At the beginning of March, there was no significant difference of SAS scores of personnel in different demographic communities (P > 0.05). Conclusions During the outbreak of COVID 19, with the diagnosed cases increasing, community prevention and control personnel all had certain anxiety. However, with the epidemic control and timely psychological intervention, the psychological status of the community epidemic prevention and control personnel had basically returned to normal. Paying attention to the family support of these personnel and humanistic care can effectively reduce the anxiety. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
| 点击此处可从《职业卫生与应急救援》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《职业卫生与应急救援》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
