首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

个人健康状况评估问卷信度和效度评价
引用本文:袁宝石, 司超增, 潘廷芳, 王增珍, 刘民, 单广良. 个人健康状况评估问卷信度和效度评价[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2012, 28(2): 149-151. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws-2012-28-02-10
作者姓名:袁宝石  司超增  潘廷芳  王增珍  刘民  单广良
作者单位:1.中国医学科学院基础医学研究所北京协和医学院基础学院流行病与卫生统计学系, 北京100005;2.中日友好医院信息中心;3.华中科技大学同济医学院公共卫生学院;4.北京大学公共卫生学院
基金项目:国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)项目(2006AA02Z428);科技部“十一·五”支撑课题(2008BAI52B01)
摘    要:目的 评价个人健康状况评估问卷的信度与效度。方法应用自行编制的个人健康状况评估问卷对湖北省3 187名18~55岁居民的健康状态进行测量,采用探索性因素分析和信效度检验方法评价该问卷的信度和效度。结果 通过探索性因素分析,确定个人健康状况评估问卷由躯体心理和社会适应、疲劳评定、睡眠质量评定3个分量表组成;其中躯体心理和社会适应量表共包括社会支持、精力、疼痛等7个因子共30个条目,方差贡献率为55.37%;疲劳评定量表包括疲劳症状1个因子共4个条目,方差贡献率为67.94%;睡眠质量评定量表包括睡眠质量1个因子共5个条目,方差贡献率为41.95%;躯体心理和社会适应、疲劳评定、睡眠质量评定各分量表的Cronbach'sα系数分别为0.8750、0.842、0.643,3个分量表得分与简明健康调查问卷(SF-36)得分的同时效度系数分别为0.633、0.363、0.457(均P<0.01),该问卷具有较好的信度和效度。结论 个人健康状况评估问卷具有较好的信度和效度,可作为中国成人亚健康状态的测评工具。

关 键 词:个人健康状况评估问卷  信度  效度  评价
收稿时间:2011-06-29

Reliability and validity of Questionnaire on Health Status Assessment
YUAN Bao-shi, SI Chao-zeng, PAN Ting-fang, . Reliability and validity of Questionnaire on Health Status Assessment[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2012, 28(2): 149-151. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws-2012-28-02-10
Authors:YUAN Bao-shi  SI Chao-zeng  PAN Ting-fang
Affiliation:1.Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Institute of Basic Medical Science, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Basic Medicine, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100005, China
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of a self-designed Questionnaire on Health Status Assessment.Methods Data were collected from 3 187 participants aged 18-55 years in Hubei province with the questionnaire.The construct validity was evaluated by exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach alpha coefficients were estimated to investigate the homogeneity reliability.Results Exploratory factor analysis revealed that the questionnaire contained soma-psychological-social scale(SPSS),fatigue assessment scale(FAS) and sleep quality scale(SQS).The SPSS was consisted of a social support factor,a vigour factor,and a pain factor.These factors accounted for 55.37% of the variance on the SPSS.FAS and SQS was consisted of a fatigue factor and a sleep quality factor,respectively,which accounted for 67.94% and 41.95% of the variance on the FAS and SQS.The correlation coefficient of these 3 sub-scale with the MOS 36-item short-form health survey(SF-36) was 0.633,0.363,and 0.457,respectively.The Cronbach alpha coefficients of sub-scales varied between 0.643-0.875.Conclusion The reliability and validity of the Questionnaire on Health Status Assessment are good and the questionnaire could be used as an effective tool to measure the status of sub-health among Chinese adults.
Keywords:Questionnaire on Health Status Assessment  reliability  validity  evaluation
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国公共卫生》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国公共卫生》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号