Freehand-robot-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Initial experience in the Trinidad and Tobago |
| |
| Authors: | Shamir O Cawich Yardesh Singh Vijay Naraynsingh Ramdas Senasi Tan Arulampalam |
| |
| Affiliation: | Department of Surgery, University of the West Indies, St Augustine, Trinidad and TobagoDepartment of Clinical Surgical Sciences, University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad and TobagoDepartment of Surgery, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Trust, South Shields NE34 0PL, United KingdomDepartment of General Surgery, Colchester Hospital University National Health Services Foundation Trust, Colchester, Essex, England, Colchester CO4 5JL, United Kingdom |
| |
| Abstract: | Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is still developing in the Anglophone Caribbean, having been first performed in the region in the year 2011. We report the initial outcomes using a robot camera holder to assist in laparoscopic colorectal operations. AIMTo report our initial experience using the FreeHand® robotic camera holder (Freehand 2010 Ltd., Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom) for laparoscopic colorectal surgery in Trinidad & Tobago.METHODSWe retrospectively collected data from all patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resections using the Freehand® (Freehand 2010 Ltd., Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom) robotic camera holder between September 30, 2021 and April 30, 2022. The following data were recorded: patient demographics, robotic arm setup time, operating time, conversions to open surgery, conversions to a human camera operator, number and duration of intra-operative lens cleaning. At the termination of the operation, before operating notes were completed, the surgeons were administered a questionnaire recording information on ergonomics, user-difficulty, requirement to convert to a human camera operator and their ability to carry out effective movements to control the robot while operating.RESULTSNine patients at a mean age of 58.9 ± 7.1 years underwent colorectal operations using the FreeHand robot: Right hemicolectomies (5), left hemicolectomy (1), sigmoid colectomies (2) and anterior resection (1). The mean robot docking time was 6.33 minutes (Median 6; Range 4-10; SD ± 1.8). The mean duration of operation was 122.33 ± 78.5 min and estimated blood loss was 113.33 ± 151.08 mL. There were no conversions to a human camera holder. The laparoscope was detached from the robot for lens cleaning/defogging an average of 2.6 ± 0.88 times per case, with cumulative mean interruption time of 4.2 ± 2.15 minutes per case. The mean duration of hospitalization was 3.2 ± 1.30 days and there were no complications recorded. When the surgeons were interviewed after operation, the surgeons reported that there were good ergonomics (100%), with no limitation on instrument movement (100%), stable image (100%) and better control of surgical field (100%).CONCLUSIONRobot-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery is feasible and safe in the resource-poor Caribbean setting, once there is appropriate training. |
| |
| Keywords: | Laparoscopic Robotic Minimally invasive Colorectal |
|
| 点击此处可从《World Journal of Surgical Procedures》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
