首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


An evaluation of the challenges to developing tumor BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing methodologies for clinical practice
Authors:Miika Ahdesmäki  Sally Luke  Paul M. Waring  Andrew Wallace  Ronnie Wright  Benno Röthlisberger  Katja Ludin  Sabine Merkelbach‐Bruse  Carina Heydt  Marjolijn J.L. Ligtenberg  Arjen R. Mensenkamp  David Gonzalez de Castro  Thomas Jones  Ana Vivancos  Olga Kondrashova  Patrick Pauwels  Christine Weyn  Eric Hahnen  Jan Hauke  Richie Soong  Zhongwu Lai  Brian Dougherty  T. Hedley Carr  Justin Johnson  John Mills  J. Carl Barrett
Affiliation:1. Translational Science, Oncology, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UKGillian Ellison and Miika Ahdesm?ki contributed equally to this work.;2. R&D Information, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK;3. Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;4. Genomic Diagnostics Laboratory, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Saint Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK;5. Kantonsspital Aarau, Institut für Labormedizin, Abteilung für Medizinische Genetik, Aarau, Switzerland;6. Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany;7. Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands;8. Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands;9. Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK;10. The Centre for Molecular Pathology, The Royal Marsden NHS FT, Sutton, UK;11. Laboratory 2.01, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain;12. Center for Oncological Research (CORE), Pathology Department, University Hospital Antwerp (UZA), Edegem, Belgium;13. Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany;14. Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, and Department of Pathology, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore;15. Bioscience, Oncology, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, IMED Oncology, Waltham, Massachusetts;16. Translational Science, Oncology, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Waltham, Massachusetts;17. Translational Science, Oncology, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK;18. Precision Medicine and Genomics, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, UK
Abstract:Ovarian cancer patients with germline or somatic pathogenic variants benefit from treatment with poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. Tumor BRCA1/2 testing is more challenging than germline testing as the majority of samples are formalin‐fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE), the tumor genome is complex, and the allelic fraction of somatic variants can be low. We collaborated with 10 laboratories testing BRCA1/2 in tumors to compare different approaches to identify clinically important variants within FFPE tumor DNA samples. This was not a proficiency study but an inter‐laboratory comparison to identify common issues. Each laboratory received the same tumor DNA samples ranging in genotype, quantity, quality, and variant allele frequency (VAF). Each laboratory performed their preferred next‐generation sequencing method to report on the variants. No false positive results were reported in this small study and the majority of methods detected the low VAF variants. A number of variants were not detected due to the bioinformatics analysis, variant classification, or insufficient DNA. The use of hybridization capture or short amplicon methods are recommended based on a bioinformatic assessment of the data. The study highlights the importance of establishing standards and standardization for tBRCA testing particularly when the test results dictate clinical decisions regarding life extending therapies.
Keywords:diagnostic  FFPE  NGS  PARP  tBRCA
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号