| 手术治疗Maisonneuve骨折失误1例报告 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 姬洪全,周方,田耘,张志山,郭琰,吕扬,杨钟玮,侯国进. 手术治疗Maisonneuve骨折失误1例报告[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(2): 354-356. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2017.02.030 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 姬洪全 周方 田耘 张志山 郭琰 吕扬 杨钟玮 侯国进 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 北京大学第三医院骨科,北京,100191;北京大学第三医院骨科,北京,100191;北京大学第三医院骨科,北京,100191;北京大学第三医院骨科,北京,100191;北京大学第三医院骨科,北京,100191;北京大学第三医院骨科,北京,100191;北京大学第三医院骨科,北京,100191;北京大学第三医院骨科,北京,100191 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 损伤因涉及下胫腓联合韧带的损伤及腓骨近端骨折，易造成踝关节对合关系及稳定性改变，往往需要手术治疗,手术虽不复杂却存在严重失误的风险。本文通过总结1例Maisonneuve损伤手术治疗失败的病例资料，提醒医生在对该损伤进行手术治疗时注意避免类似的失误。
|
| 关 键 词： | 骨折 腓骨 踝关节 外科手术 |
One of the pitfalls in the surgical treatment of maisonneuve fractures: a case report |
| |
| JI Hong-quan,ZHOU Fang,TIAN Yun,ZHANG Zhi-shan,GUO Yan,LV Yang,YANG Zhong-wei,HOU Guo-jin. One of the pitfalls in the surgical treatment of maisonneuve fractures: a case report[J]. Journal of Peking University. Health sciences, 2017, 49(2): 354-356. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2017.02.030 |
| |
| Authors: | JI Hong-quan ZHOU Fang TIAN Yun ZHANG Zhi-shan GUO Yan LV Yang YANG Zhong-wei HOU Guo-jin |
| |
| Affiliation: | (Department of Orthopaedic, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | There exist controversies in the surgical treatment of maisonneuve injury with regard to reduction and fixation of syndesmosis and management of proximal fibular fracture. It is very important for the orthopaedic surgeons to learn more techniques and avoid pitfalls from clinical practice. We summarized the clinical data of 1 failed case, a 20-year-old girl with big body weight who underwent a primary surgery for the treatment of maisonneuve fracture with minimally invasive reduction and fixation of ankle syndesmosis and posterior malleolus and open reduction and internal fixation of medial malleolus, then a revision surgery for the treatment of iatrogenic syndesmotic malreduction with open reduction and re-stabilization of ankle syndesmosis supplemented with open reduction and internal fixation of proximal fibular facture. The malreduction of distal fibula was not found until finishing the postoperative computed tomography (CT) scan 2 weeks after the primary surgery, then the patient experienced an revision surgery including removal of the screws installed primarily for fixation of ankle syndesmosis, and open reduction and internal fixation of proximal fibular fracture, and limited open reduction and re-stabilization of ankle syndesmosis. Then the patient rehabilitated regularly under the direction of the surgeon who performed these two operations, and the postoperative recovery was smooth, then the hardwares for fixation of ankle syndesmosis and fracture of proximal fibula and medial malleolus were removed at different postoperative time. The patient experienced an excellent outcome at the end of the 3-year follow-up. The reasons for the failure in this case might include the overemphasized minimally invasive technique in the process of reduction, inaccurate assessment of intraoperative fluoroscopy and postoperative radiographs, and inappropriate utilization of the reduction clamp. Attention should be paid to the fact that an obliquely placed clamp for closed reduction of diastasis of ankle syndesmosis could result in syndesmotic malreduction. The worsened alignment of the fracture end of proximal fibula observed by intraoperative fluoroscopy may alert surgeons to syndesmotic malreduction. Partial exposure of syndesmosis and anatomical reduction and fixation of proximal fibular fracture may be useful measurres to avoid malreduction of ankle syndesmosis in the surgical treatment of maisonneuve injury in some patient, especially the patient with critically destabilized ankle. |
| |
| Keywords: | Fractures bone Fibula Ankle joint Surgical procedures operative |
| 本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《北京大学学报(医学版)》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《北京大学学报(医学版)》下载全文 |
|
