首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

C臂机导航下经皮椎弓根钉内固定联合对侧微创TLIF治疗腰椎管狭窄症
引用本文:杨明杰,李立钧,麻彬,潘杰,韩应超,谭军. C臂机导航下经皮椎弓根钉内固定联合对侧微创TLIF治疗腰椎管狭窄症[J]. 组织工程与重建外科, 2013, 9(3): 158-160. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-0364.2013.03.011
作者姓名:杨明杰  李立钧  麻彬  潘杰  韩应超  谭军
作者单位:同济大学附属东方医院脊柱外科  上海市  (200120)
摘    要:目的 探讨导航辅助下经皮椎弓根钉内固定,联合对侧微创经椎间孔椎体间融合术(Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion,TLIF),治疗腰椎管狭窄症的临床应用.方法 2010年6月至2012年6月,对47例腰椎管狭窄症患者行导航下经皮椎弓根钉内固定,联合对侧微创TLIF术治疗,观察手术时间、出血量以及手术前后的VAS和ODI评分,并将经皮钉侧和开放置钉侧进行配伍对照比较.结果 平均出血量为(420±45) mL;术前VAS评分为(6.85±1.03),术后1月VAS评分为(1.88±0.79);术前ODI评分为(31.6±3.05),术后1月ODI评分为(43.1±3.23).配伍对照研究结果显示,经皮钉组A级101枚、B级9枚、C级2枚,开放置钉组A级86枚、B级21枚、C级4枚、D级1枚.经皮钉组平均置钉时间为(11.25±4.33) min,透视次数为(2.73±0.42)次,开放置钉组平均置钉时间为(15.43±5.65) min,透视次数为(4.12±0.85)次.差异均有统计学意义.结论 导航辅助下经皮椎弓根钉内固定,联合对侧微创TLIF治疗腰椎管狭窄症疗,效果显著,导航辅助下经皮钉组置钉术的准确度优于开放置钉组,透视次数和置钉时间均少于开放组.

关 键 词:导航  经皮椎弓根钉内固定  经椎间孔椎体间融合术  微创  腰椎管狭窄症  

Percutaneous Pedicle screw Fixation Combine with Contralateral MIS -TLIF Under C -arm Navigation in the Treatment of Lumbar Stenosis
YANG Mingjie,LI Lijun,MA Bin,PAN Jie,HAN Yingchao,TAN Jun. Percutaneous Pedicle screw Fixation Combine with Contralateral MIS -TLIF Under C -arm Navigation in the Treatment of Lumbar Stenosis[J]. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Reconstructive Surgery, 2013, 9(3): 158-160. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-0364.2013.03.011
Authors:YANG Mingjie  LI Lijun  MA Bin  PAN Jie  HAN Yingchao  TAN Jun
Affiliation:. Department of Spine Surgery, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai 200120, China.
Abstract:Objective To investigate the outcome of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation combine with contralateral MissTLIF under c-arm navigation in the treatment of lumbar stenosis.Methods From June 2010 to June 2012,47 patients with lumbar stenosis underwent the operation of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation combine with contralateral Miss-TLIF under c-arm navigation.The operating time,blood loss,pre-and post-operative VAS and ODI were documented.A controlled cohort study was made for percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and traditional pedicle screw placement.Results The mean blood loss was(420±45) mL.Mean pre-operative VAS was 6.85±1.03 and 1 month post-operative VAS was 1.88±0.79.Mean pre-operative ODI was 31.6±3.05 and 1 month post-operative ODI was 43.1±3.23.In navigation group,grade A was in 101 screws,B in 9 screws and C in 2 screws.And in traditional group,grade A in 86 crews,B in 21 screws,C in 4 screws and D in 1 screw.Average screw insertion time was(11.25±4.33) min and mean X-ray exposure was 2.73±0.42 in navigation group.Average screw insertion time was(15.43±5.65) min and mean X-ray exposure was 4.12±0.85 in traditional group.There were significant differences between the two groups.Conclusion Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation combine with contralateral MIS-TLIF under c-arm navigation could obtain satisfactory results in the treatment of lumbar stenosis.Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation is more accuracy,need less operating time and X-ray exposure than traditional screw placement.
Keywords:Navigation  Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation  Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion  Minimal invasive  Lumbar stenosis
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《组织工程与重建外科》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《组织工程与重建外科》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号