首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Sodium bicarbonate vs sodium chloride for the prevention of contrast medium-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing coronary angiography: a randomized trial
Authors:Brar Somjot S  Shen Albert Yuh-Jer  Jorgensen Michael B  Kotlewski Adam  Aharonian Vicken J  Desai Natasha  Ree Michael  Shah Ahmed Ijaz  Burchette Raoul J
Affiliation:Center for Interventional Vascular Therapy, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York (Dr Brar); Kaiser Permanente, Los Angeles (Drs Shen, Jorgensen, Kotlewski, Aharonian, and Shah and Ms Desai and Mr Ree) and Pasadena (Mr Burchette), California; and UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles (Drs Shen and Jorgensen).
Abstract:
Somjot S. Brar, MD; Albert Yuh-Jer Shen, MD; Michael B. Jorgensen, MD; Adam Kotlewski, MD; Vicken J. Aharonian, MD; Natasha Desai, BS; Michael Ree, BS; Ahmed Ijaz Shah, MD; Raoul J. Burchette, MS

JAMA. 2008;300(9):1038-1046.

Context  Sodium bicarbonate has been suggested as a possible strategy for prevention of contrast medium–induced nephropathy, a common cause of renal failure associated with prolonged hospitalization, increased health care costs, and substantial morbidity and mortality.

Objective  To determine if sodium bicarbonate is superior to sodium chloride for preventing contrast medium–induced nephropathy in patients with moderate to severe chronic kidney dysfunction who are undergoing coronary angiography.

Design, Setting, and Patients  Randomized, controlled, single-blind study conducted between January 2, 2006, and January 31, 2007, and enrolling 353 patients with stable renal disease who were undergoing coronary angiography at a single US center. Included patients were 18 years or older and had an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 or less and 1 or more of diabetes mellitus, history of congestive heart failure, hypertension, or age older than 75 years.

Interventions  Patients were randomized to receive either sodium chloride (n = 178) or sodium bicarbonate (n = 175) administered at the same rate (3 mL/kg for 1 hour before coronary angiography, decreased to 1.5 mL/kg per hour during the procedure and for 4 hours after the completion of the procedure).

Main Outcome Measure  The primary end point was a 25% or greater decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate on days 1 through 4 after contrast exposure.

Results  Median patient age was 71 (interquartile range, 65-76) years, and 45% had diabetes mellitus. The groups were well matched for baseline characteristics. The primary end point was met in 13.3% of the sodium bicarbonate group and 14.6% of the sodium chloride group (relative risk, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-1.60; P = .82). In patients randomized to receive sodium bicarbonate vs sodium chloride, the rates of death, dialysis, myocardial infarction, and cerebrovascular events did not differ significantly at 30 days (1.7% vs 1.7%, 0.6% vs 1.1%, 0.6% vs 0%, and 0% vs 2.2%, respectively) or at 30 days to 6 months (0.6% vs 2.3%, 0.6% vs 1.1%, 0.6% vs 2.3%, and 0.6% vs 1.7%, respectively) (P > .10 for all).

Conclusion  The results of this study do not suggest that hydration with sodium bicarbonate is superior to hydration with sodium chloride for the prevention of contrast medium–induced nephropathy in patients with moderate to severe chronic kidney disease who are undergoing coronary angiography.

Trial Registration  clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00312117

Keywords:
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号