| 塞纳斯凝胶在鼻息肉伴睡眠呼吸障碍成年患者鼻内镜术中的应用 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王海鹏,徐会娟,张秀芳,王惠忠,李延忠. 塞纳斯凝胶在鼻息肉伴睡眠呼吸障碍成年患者鼻内镜术中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2016, 30(5): 58-60. DOI: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2016.153 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王海鹏 徐会娟 张秀芳 王惠忠 李延忠 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1.淄博市中心医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 山东 淄博 255031;2.山东大学齐鲁医院耳鼻咽喉科/卫生部耳鼻咽喉科学重点实验室, 山东 济南 250012 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的 为选择更适合鼻内镜术临床应用的填塞材料,总结归纳塞纳斯凝胶在慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉(CRSwNP)引起的睡眠呼吸障碍(SDB)患者行鼻内镜术中的应用情况,探讨SDB患者与非SDB患者应用塞纳斯凝胶后其舒适度的差异。 方法 双侧CRSwNP成人患者216例施行鼻内镜手术,其中伴SDB 156例,不伴SDB 60例。分为4个组,其中A组为不伴SDB患者术中填塞塞纳斯凝胶60例、B组为伴SDB患者术中填塞塞纳斯凝胶组56例, C组为伴SDB患者术中填塞纳吸棉组47例, D组为伴SDB患者术中填塞医用膨胀海绵组53例。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)对其鼻腔反应进行比较。 结果 A组和B组比较,塞纳斯凝胶在头痛、鼻痛及术后出血三方面差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),SDB患者在这三方面更不耐受。B组与C组比较,在头痛、鼻痛、鼻塞感、流泪四方面差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),塞纳斯凝胶优于纳吸棉。B组与D组比较,在头痛、鼻痛、鼻塞感、流泪、吞咽障碍、术后出血6个方面差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),但临床意义不同,在术后出血方面塞纳斯凝胶组的效果虽差于医用膨胀海绵组,但仍可接受,其余方面塞纳斯凝胶明显优于膨胀海绵。 结论 塞纳斯凝胶是更适合于临床应用的填塞材料,能为患者带来更高的术后舒适度。另外SDB能加重患者头痛、鼻痛和术后出血症状,可能与长期缺氧致炎症反应较重有关。
|
| 关 键 词： | 鼻息肉 塞纳斯凝胶 鼻腔填塞 内镜手术 睡眠呼吸障碍 |
| 收稿时间： | 2016-04-05 |
The application of Sinus Jel in adult patients of nasal polyps with sleep-disordered breathing |
| |
| WANG Haipeng,XU Huijuan,ZHANG Xiufang,WANG Huizhong,LI Yanzhong. The application of Sinus Jel in adult patients of nasal polyps with sleep-disordered breathing[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2016, 30(5): 58-60. DOI: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2016.153 |
| |
| Authors: | WANG Haipeng XU Huijuan ZHANG Xiufang WANG Huizhong LI Yanzhong |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Department of Otolaryngology &Head and Neck Surgery, Zibo Central Hospital, Zibo 255031, Shandong, China;2. Department of Otolaryngology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University / Key Laboratory of Otorhinolaryngology of Health Ministry, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective To explore whether PureRegen Gel Sinus is a suitable nasal packing material for patients with sleep-disordered breathing (SDB)caused by chronic rhinosinusitis plus nasal polys (CRSwNP).Methods A total of 216 CRSwNP cases including 156 SDB and 60 non-SDB cases were divided into 4 groups.Group A (60 non-SDB ca-ses)and group B (56 SDB cases)were treated with PureRegen Gel Sinus after nasal sinus surgery.Group C included 47 SDB cases treated with Nasopore.Group D included 53 SDB cases treated with Medical Sponge.The nasal reactions of the 4 groups were compared with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).Results There were significant differences in headache,rhinalgia and postoperative bleeding between group A and B (P <0.05).Patients with SDB were more in-tolerant to these complications.There were statistical differences in headache,rhinalgia,rhinobyon and lacrimation be-tween group B and C (P <0.05).PureRegen Gel Sinus was was superior to Nasopore.There were statistical differ-ences in headache,rhinalgia,rhinobyon,lacrimation,dysphagia and postoperative bleeding between group B and D (P <0.05).PureRegen Gel Sinus was no better than medical sponge in dealing with postoperative bleeding,but it was still acceptable.PureRegen Gel Sinus was superior to medical sponge in other aspects.Conclusion PureRegen Gel Si-nus is more suitable for clinical practice as a packing material.In addition,SDB can worsen headache,rhinalgia and postoperative bleeding,which may be associated with inflammation resulted from long-term oxygen depletion. |
| |
| Keywords: | Nasal packing Endoscopic sinus surgery Sleep-disordered breathing Nasal polyps PureRegen Gel Sinus |
| 本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报》下载全文 |
|
