| 合肥市社区老年人久坐类型与抑郁关系的性别差异研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 蒋燕1,' target='_blank'>3,陆叶2,崔静萍3,储爱琴1. 合肥市社区老年人久坐类型与抑郁关系的性别差异研究[J]. 现代预防医学, 2023, 0(8): 1456-1460. DOI: 10.20043/j.cnki.MPM.202212191 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 蒋燕1 ' target='_blank'>3 陆叶2 崔静萍3 储爱琴1 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1.中国科学技术大学附属第一医院(安徽省立医院)护理部,安徽 合肥 230001;&2.蚌埠医学院护理学院; 3.中国科学技术大学附属第一医院(安徽省立医院)呼吸与危重症医学科 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 2020年教育部人文社会科学研究项目(20YJAZH019)； |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的 调查社区老年人久坐类型现状，分析不同类型久坐行为与抑郁的关系，并探讨两者之间关系在性别方面的差异。方法 自2021年11月至2022年4月，便利抽样法选择安徽省合肥市某3所社区的648名老年人为调查对象；采用量表的形式调查老年人的久坐类型及抑郁情况；使用二分类logistics回归分析探讨不同性别间久坐类型对抑郁的影响。结果 社区老年人每日总久坐时长为(6.05±1.43) h,被动思维久坐时长为(3.68±1.96) h,主动思维久坐时长为(2.36±1.61) h。主动思维久坐时长和被动思维久坐时长存在性别差异(P<0.05)。二分类logistics回归结果发现被动思维久坐会增加老年男性(OR=1.780,95%CI:1.392～2.277)和老年女性(OR=1.629,95%CI:1.377～1.927)抑郁的患病风险；而主动思维久坐会减少老年女性(OR=0.810,95%CI:0.678～0.968)抑郁的患病风险(P<0.05)。结论 社区老年人久坐类型以被动思维久坐为主；被动思维久坐延长与老年群体抑郁患病的上升有关，而主动思维久坐延长与老年女性抑郁患病的...
|
| 关 键 词： | 久坐类型 久坐行为 抑郁 老年人 社区 |
Gender differences on the relationship between sedentary types and depression among older adults in Hefei |
| |
| JIANG Yan,LU Ye,CUI Jing-ping,CHU Ai-qin. Gender differences on the relationship between sedentary types and depression among older adults in Hefei[J]. Modern Preventive Medicine, 2023, 0(8): 1456-1460. DOI: 10.20043/j.cnki.MPM.202212191 |
| |
| Authors: | JIANG Yan LU Ye CUI Jing-ping CHU Ai-qin |
| |
| Affiliation: | *Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China (Anhui Provincial Hospital), Hefei, Anhui 230001, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective To investigate the current situation of sedentary behavior among the older adults in communities, to analyze the relationship between different types of sedentary behavior and depression, and to explore the gender differences in the relationship between them. Methods From November 2021 to April 2022, 648 older adults from 3 communities in Hefei, Anhui Province were selected as the survey subjects by convenient sampling method. The type of sedentary and depression of the older adults were investigated with a scale. The effects of various sedentary types on depression and gender differences were analyzed by binary logistic regression. Results The total daily sedentary time of the older adults in communities was(6.05±1.43)h, the sedentary time of mentally passive was(3.68±1.96)h, and the sedentary time of mentally active was(2.36±1.61)h. There was a gender difference between mentally active and mentally passive(P<0.05). The results of logistic regression showed that mentally passive sedentariness increased the risk of depression in older men(OR=1.780, 95%CI: 1.392-2.277)and women(OR=1.629, 95%CI: 1.377-1.927). Mentally active sedentariness would reduce the risk of depression in older women(OR=0.810, 95%CI: 0.678-0.968). Conclusion Mentally passive is the main sedentary type of the older adults in communities. Prolonged mentally passive sedentariness is associated with an increased risk of depression in older adults, while prolonged mentally active sedentariness is associated with a decreased risk of depression in older women. |
| |
| Keywords: | Sedentary type Sedentary behavior Depression Older adults Community |
|
| 点击此处可从《现代预防医学》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《现代预防医学》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
