| Cornell痴呆抑郁量表的信度和效度检验 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 龙彬,陈美娟,宋立升.Cornell痴呆抑郁量表的信度和效度检验[J].四川精神卫生,2001,14(4):209-210. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 龙彬 陈美娟 宋立升 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 200030,上海市精神卫生中心 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的检测Cornell痴呆抑郁量表的信度和效度.方法对60例痴呆患者进行测试,由四位医生进行联合评定.结果Cornell痴呆抑郁量表具有良好的内部一致性,联合评定ICC=0.87、F=24.59,P＜0.01.与HAMD量表评分相比,相关系数r=0.833,P＜0.01.平行效度好,在判断抑郁程度方面F值为0.01,P＜0.01.结论Cornell痴呆抑郁量表具有良好的我信度和效度,值得在临床推广.
|
| 关 键 词： | Cornell痴呆抑郁量表 信度 效度 |
| 修稿时间： | 2001年7月10日 |
The reliability and validity for Cornell scale for depression in dementia |
| |
| RONG Bin,CHENG Meijuan,SONG Lisheng.The reliability and validity for Cornell scale for depression in dementia[J].Sichuan Mental Health,2001,14(4):209-210. |
| |
| Authors: | RONG Bin CHENG Meijuan SONG Lisheng |
| |
| Institution: | RONG Bin,CHENG Meijuan,SONG Lisheng.Shanghai Mental Health Center,Shanghai.200030 |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective To investigate the reliability and validity of Cornell scale for depression in dementia(CSDD).Methods 30 patients with dementia were recruited into the study and were co-evaluated by four doctors.Results CSDD showed high inter-rater consistence(ICC=0.87,F=24.59,P<0.01)and a good parallel validity,and had a significant related with Hamilton depression scale(r=0.833,P<0.01).It aslo displayed a good experiential validity and structual validity.Conclusions CSDD has good reliability and validity. |
| |
| Keywords: | CSDD Reliability Validity |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
