首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

赌博相关认知量表中文版在大学生中的信效度检验
引用本文:杨裕萍,吴大兴,李涵贵,文艺.赌博相关认知量表中文版在大学生中的信效度检验[J].神经疾病与精神卫生,2013,13(1):23-26.
作者姓名:杨裕萍  吴大兴  李涵贵  文艺
作者单位:410011,中南大学湘雅二医院医学心理研究所
基金项目:湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目
摘    要:目的观察赌博相关认知量表中文版(GRCS—C)在大学生人群中的适用性。方法采取整群抽样的方法共抽取1787名大学生进行调查,并以赌博冲动量表(GUS—C)、抑郁-焦虑-压力量表(DASS-21)为效标,检验效标效度,其中96名学生4周后用GRcs—C重测。结果GRCS—C总量表的Cronbach’sa系数为0.934,各分量表的“系数在0.673~0.839;量表分半信度在0.706~0.880,4周后的重测信度在0.728~0.900,23个条目间的平均相关系数为0.398,5个分量表的条目间平均相关系数在0.371~0.553。验证性因素分析显示GRCS—C二阶五因素结构模型拟合最好(x^2/df=12.305,GFI-0.867,NFI-0.867,IFI=0.877,RMSEA=0.080)。赌博相关认知量表(GRCS—C)总分及其分量表和GUS—C总分的相关系数在0.256~0.357,与DASS-21总分及其分量表的相关系数在0.124-0.207(P〈0.01)。在赌博相关认知总分及4个分量表(赌博期待、无力戒毒、控制错觉和解释偏差)得分上男性高于女性,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。结论GRCS--C具有较好的信度和效度,可以在国内大学生群体研究中采用。

关 键 词:认知  赌博  量表  信度  效度  大学生

Reliability and validity of Chinese Version of Gambling Related Cognitions Scale in college students
Institution:YANG Yu-ping ,WU Da-xing , Li Han-gui , et al.( The Medical Psychology Institute of the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410011 ,China)
Abstract:Objective To examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Gam- bling Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS--C) in Chinese college students. Methods Totally 1 787 college students completed a battery of structured questionnaire,including the Chinese version of the Gambling Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS--C), Chinese version of Gambling Urge Scale (GUC--C), The De- pression Anxiety Stress Scale--21(DASS--21), and analyzed by reliability test and validity test. And 96 students were retested using GRCS--C after 4 weeks. Results Cronbach's a coefficient, the split--half reliability coefficient and four--week test--retest reliability coefficient of the scale were 0. 934, 0. 706~ 0. 880 and 0. 728-0. 900 respectively, inter--item mean correlations was 0. 371-0. 553. The results of Confirmatory Factor Analysis showed that the second--order model fits the data well (X^2/df= 12. 305, GFI:0. 867, NFI:0. 867,IF1=0. 877, RMSEA=0. 080). The total score and subscales were significant positively correlated with the total of GUC--C,the total and subscales of DASS--21 (r : 0. 256 0. 357,0. 124- 0. 207;P 〈 0.01). There was a significant gender difference in the GRCS--C total score and four subscales, males had higher scores than females (P 〈 0.01). Conclusions GRCS--C has good reliability and validity, and could be used as an effective tool for assessing Gambling Related Cognitions in Chinese college students.
Keywords:Cognitions  Gambling  Scale  Reliability  Validity  College student
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号