首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

加里福尼亚痴呆行为问卷的信度和效度检验
引用本文:周卉,盛建华,高之旭,陆光华,周琳琳.加里福尼亚痴呆行为问卷的信度和效度检验[J].上海精神医学,2000,12(2):84-85.
作者姓名:周卉  盛建华  高之旭  陆光华  周琳琳
作者单位:200030,上海市精神卫生中心
摘    要:目的:检测加里福尼亚痴呆行为问卷(CDBQ)的信度与效度。方法对60例Alzheimer病(AD)患者进行测试,其中有48例患者完成二倍照料者的联合评定。结果CDBQ具有良好的内部一致性,Cornbach’sα=0.7863,p〈0.01,联合检测的一致性高,ICC=0.8508,P〈0.01。与简明精神病量表(BPRS)评分相比,相关系数r=0.36,P〈0.01,平行效度较好。结论CDBQ中译

关 键 词:加里福尼亚痴呆行为问卷  信度  效度
修稿时间:1999年11月13

The reliability and validity for California Dementia Behavior Questionnaire
Zhou Hui,Sheng Jian-hua,Gao zhixu,et al..The reliability and validity for California Dementia Behavior Questionnaire[J].Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry,2000,12(2):84-85.
Authors:Zhou Hui  Sheng Jian-hua  Gao zhixu  
Institution:Zhou Hui,Sheng Jian-hua,Gao zhixu,et al. Shanghai Mental Health Center,Shanghai 200030
Abstract:Objective: To investigate the reliability and validity for California Dementia Behavior Questionnaire (CDBQ). Methods: 60 patients with Alzheimer's disease were recruited into the study and 48 of them were co-evaluated by two caregivers. Results: CDBQ showed high internal consistence (Cron-bach's a-0. 7863, P<0. 01) and high inter-caregiver consistence (ICC=0. 8508, P<0. 01). It also displayed a good parallel validity to BPRS (r=0. 36, P<0. 01). Conclusions: The Chinese version of CDBQ has good reliability and validity.
Keywords:CDBQ Reliability Validity  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号