86例司法精神医学鉴定案例的专家复鉴分析

目的 通过对司法精神医学专家委员会（专委会）鉴定案例的总结来分析司法精神鉴定呆叹服各种偏差及其原因。方法 收集８６例专委会鉴定案全的社会人口学、病史以及各次鉴定资料；先以提清专委会舂组对有关资料进行对照分析。然后对各次鉴定之间的一致性进行检验。结果 提请专委员鉴定的案例在案型、鉴定诊断上有一定的特殊性；被鉴定人既往有违法肇祝史者较易提清专委会鉴定；袍次鉴定与他处复鉴之间无 精神症状检查、鉴定诊断还

A comparative analysis of 86 re-assessed cases in forensic psychiatric expertise

Objective: To analyze potential deviations or errors in forensic psychiatric expertise.Method: Socio-epidcmiological, historical and forensic data of 86 re-assessed cases were collected through case-review and investigation. Comparative analyses were used to determine the differences between groups with various applying causes. Consistencies of recognition of mental symptoms, diagnoses and legal capacities were also examined between Expert Committee of Forensic Psychiatric Expertise (ECFPE) and other expertise institutes. Results: There are special offending types and diagnoses,in reassessed cases. Significant consistencies existed between previous and reassessed expertise in the rating of mental symptoms, diagnosis making and legal capacity conclusion. Conclusion: ECFPE may be an effective way to resolve deviations and difficulties in forensic psychiatric expertise.