自行编制的社区抑郁状态电话筛查问卷与常用抑郁和焦虑评定量表的一致性研究(下)

目的 研究自行编制的社区抑郁状态电话筛查问卷(community depression status screening questionnaire via telephone,CDSQ-T)与Hamilton抑郁量表(Hamilton depression rating scale,HAMD)、Hamilton焦虑量表(Hamilton anxiety rating scale,HAMA)、Zung抑郁自评量表(self-rating depression scale,SDS)、Zung焦虑自评量表(self-rating anxiety seale,SAS)的相关性和一致性.方法 对14～86岁458例门诊患者同时先后进行CDSQ-T与HAMD、HAMA、SDS、SAS量表的评估.比较CDSQ-T与四个量表总分的相关性和一致性.线性关系采用线性回归模型分析.结果 Pearson相关分析显示,CDSQ-T总分与HAMD、HAMA、SDS、SAS的总分均明显相关(r分别为0.79、0.71、0.76、0.72,P均小于0.05);CDSQ-T总分与HAMD、HAMA、SDS、SAS总分的回归方程中回归系数分别为0.56、0.61、0.91、0.81(P<0.05);CDSQ-T总分与HAMD、HAMA、SDS、SAS总分散点图拟合直线的决定系数R2分别为0.63、0.50、0.57、0.52(P<0.05).结论 CDSQ-T与HAMD、HAMA、SDS、SAS之间均具有显著的线性相关,尤其是与自评的抑郁量表的一致性最好.

The study on the correlation of community depression status phone screening questionnaire with conventional depression and anxiety scales

Objective To investigate the correlation and consistency of community depression status phone screening questionnaire(CDSQ-T) with HAMD,SDS,HAMA and SAS.Method Four hundred fifty-eight outpatients from department of neurology were recruited into this study.The age of the subjects was 14-86 years.The patients were tested with CDSQ-T,Hamilton depression rating scale(HAMD),Hamilton anxiety rating scale(HAMA),self-rating depression scale(SDS) and self-rating anxiety scale(SAS) by the same psychologist at the sa...