Percutaneous Gastrostomy Compared with Esophageal Stent Placement for the Treatment of Esophageal Cancer with Dysphagia

PurposeTo compare the outcomes of self-expandable metal stent placement and percutaneous gastrostomy (PG) for the treatment of patients with esophageal cancer (EC) and dysphagia.Materials and MethodsThis retrospective observational study consisted of 113 patients with EC and dysphagia who underwent either stent placement (n = 47) or PG (n = 66) at a single center between June 2014 and June 2018.ResultsThere were 63 men and 50 women, with a mean age of 76.5 years (standard deviation 4.9 years). The 2 groups had similar baseline characteristics, except that the PG group had a higher percentage of patients with cervical EC (22.7% vs 2.1%, P < .001). The PG group had better maintenance of nutritional status in terms of reduction in serum albumin level (P = .039) and weight loss (P = .041). Compared with the stent group, the PG group demonstrated a lower incidence of local severe pain (0% vs 21.3%, P < .001) and lower incidence of dislodgment of device (1.5% vs 19.1%, P = .002). The PG group demonstrated longer overall survival compared with the stent group for Stages II and III (201 vs 185 days, P = .034) and Stage IV (122 vs 86 days, P = .001).ConclusionsCompared with stent insertion, PG is associated with better maintenance of nutritional status, fewer complications, and better survival. Thus, PG may be the preferred choice for treating malnutrition in patients with EC and dysphagia.