首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

急救医疗系统对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者预后影响
引用本文:赵蓓,魏腾飞,刘佩林,冯雪瑶,赵京涛,刘莉,宋洪勇,毛帅,刘利峰,刘瑛琪,高铁山,王守力.急救医疗系统对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者预后影响[J].临床军医杂志,2017(9).
作者姓名:赵蓓  魏腾飞  刘佩林  冯雪瑶  赵京涛  刘莉  宋洪勇  毛帅  刘利峰  刘瑛琪  高铁山  王守力
作者单位:解放军第三〇六医院 心内科,北京,100101
摘    要:目的探讨急救医疗系统对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者预后的影响。方法选取自2011年7月至2015年10月收治的急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者319例,按不同转运方式分为急救医疗系统(EMS)转运组与非EMS转运组。比较两组发病呼叫-首次医疗接触(So-to-FMC)时间、首次医疗接触-球囊扩张(FMC-to-B)时间、发病呼叫-球囊扩张(So-to-B)时间、入门-球囊扩张(D-to-B)时间的差异,分析不同转运方式发病距离与这些时间的关系。结果 EMS组So-to-FMC时间、FMC-to-B时间、So-to-B时间分别为60 min、143 min、105 min,非EMS组分别为96 min、177 min、175 min,两组间比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);EMS组与非EMS组D-to-B时间分别为107 min与106 min,两组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。EMS组So-to-FMC时间、FMC-to-B时间、So-to-B时间不随着发病距离的增加而延长(P>0.05),而非EMS组So-to-FMC时间、FMC-to-B时间、So-to-B时间均随着发病距离的增加而延长(P<0.05)。结论运用EMS转运患者不会因为发病距离的延长而增加急救时间,可有效缩短院前急救时间,进而缩短心肌缺血时间,改善患者预后。

关 键 词:急救医疗系统  急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死  发病呼叫-首次医疗接触时间  首次医疗接触-球囊扩张时间  发病呼叫-球囊扩张时间  入门-球囊扩张时间  发病距离

Effects of the distances on pre-hospital time delay of patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction
ZHAO Bei,WEI Teng-fei,LIU Pei-lin,FENG Xue-yao,ZHAO Jing-tao,LIU Li,SONG Hong-yong,MAO Shuai,LIU Li-feng,LIU Ying- qi,GAO Tie-shan,WANG Shou-li.Effects of the distances on pre-hospital time delay of patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction[J].Clinical Journal of Medical Officer,2017(9).
Authors:ZHAO Bei  WEI Teng-fei  LIU Pei-lin  FENG Xue-yao  ZHAO Jing-tao  LIU Li  SONG Hong-yong  MAO Shuai  LIU Li-feng  LIU Ying- qi  GAO Tie-shan  WANG Shou-li
Abstract:Objective To investigate the effects of the different distances on pre-hospital time of patients with STEMI. Methods A retrospective study was perfromed on 319 patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI)who were admitted from July 2011 to October 2015. Patients were divided into the EMS group and Non-EMS group according to the different route. To analyse the time intervals,including symptom onset-to-first medical contact(So-to-FMC)time,first medical contact-to-balloon(FMC-to-B)time, symptom onset call-to-balloon(So-to-B)and Door-to-balloon(D-to-B)time and relationship between distance and these time inter-vals. Results In the EMS group and Non-EMS group,the median So-to-FMC time,FMC-to-B time and So-to-B time were 60minutes versus 96minutes,143 minutes versus 177minutes and 105 minutes versus 175minutes,respectively(P < 0. 05). In the EMS group and Non-EMS group,D-to-B time was 107 minutes and 106 minutes,which had no statistically significant difference(P > 0. 05). In the EMS group,So-to-FMC time,FMC-to-B time and So-to-B time were not delayed with the increase of distances(P > 0. 05),while So-to-FMC time,FMC-to-B time and So-to-B time were delayed with the increase of distances in Non-EMS group (P < 0. 05 ). Conclusion Thetreatment time is not delayed with the different distances in patients with STEMI by using EMS. This shows that EMS is good for shortening the pre-hospital time delay,so to shorten the total ischemia time,and improve the prognosis of patients.
Keywords:Fist aid medical system  Acute ST elevation myocardial infarction  Symptom onset-to-first medical contact  First medical contact-to-balloon  Symptomonset call-to-balloon  Door-to-balloon  The onset of distance
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号