首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

球囊化疗泵与电子化疗泵在持续化疗中的应用分析
引用本文:陈梦瑾,李海香,孙蕊芳,陈勇.球囊化疗泵与电子化疗泵在持续化疗中的应用分析[J].中国医药科学,2012(23):150-151.
作者姓名:陈梦瑾  李海香  孙蕊芳  陈勇
作者单位:广东省第二人民医院肿瘤二科
摘    要:目的通过对球囊化疗泵和电子化疗泵的应用比较,找出两者的优缺点,为医护择优选择提供依据。方法将64例恶性肿瘤患者随机分为电子化疗泵组和囊性化疗泵组,应用5-Fu持续泵入化疗120h,比较两组的给药时间、配药时间和患者满意度的差异。结果电子化疗泵与球囊化疗泵输注时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但球囊化疗泵较电子化疗泵的加药时间少、患者满意率高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论球囊化疗泵能更好提高护士的工作效率并得到患者认可。

关 键 词:球囊化疗泵  电子化疗泵  持续化疗  应用分析

Analysis of Balloon pump chemotherapy and chemotherapy pump in continuous chemotherapy application
CHEN Mengjin,LI Haixiang,SUN Ruifang,CHEN Yong.Analysis of Balloon pump chemotherapy and chemotherapy pump in continuous chemotherapy application[J].China Medicine and Pharmacy,2012(23):150-151.
Authors:CHEN Mengjin  LI Haixiang  SUN Ruifang  CHEN Yong
Institution:2nd Department of Oncology,No.2 People’s Hospital of Guangdong Province,Guangzhou 510317,China
Abstract:Objective To compare the Balloon chemotherapy pump and electronic chemotherapy pump,fund out the advantages and disadvantages of them,to provide a basis for medical preferred choice.Methods 64 patients with malignant tumor were randomly divided into electronic chemotherapy pump group and cystic chemotherapy pump group,used 5-Fu continuous pump infusion for 120 hours,compared the give medicine time.dispensing time and patient satisfaction between two groups.Results The infusion time of two groups was not statistically different(P > 0.05);the opetating time of Balloon chemotherapy pump group were less than electronic chemotherapy pump group,the patient satisfaction of Balloon chemotherapy pump group wsa better than electronic chemotherapy pump group(P < 0.01).Conclusion Balloon chemotherapy pump can improve the working efficiency of the nurses and get patients recognition
Keywords:Elastomer infusion pump  Electronic infusion pump  Cancer continuous chemotherapy  Application analysis
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号