| 鼻内镜下动力系统切割器行腺样体切除术与常规腺样体刮除术的疗效比较研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 黄映红,张建国,黄敏齐,严小玲,翟锦明,马钊恩.鼻内镜下动力系统切割器行腺样体切除术与常规腺样体刮除术的疗效比较研究[J].国际医药卫生导报,2009,15(4):21-23. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 黄映红 张建国 黄敏齐 严小玲 翟锦明 马钊恩 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 广州医学院第二附属医院耳鼻喉科,510260 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的比较鼻内镜下经口动力系统切割器行腺样体切除术与常规腺样体刮除术的疗效。方法腺样体肥大患儿136例，其中69例接受鼻内镜下动力系统切割器行腺样体切除术，67例接受常规腺样体刮除术，比较两种术式的疗效。结果常规腺样体刮除术治疗组中有5例存在腺样体残留，有2例存在并发症（出血及咽鼓管咽口损伤），而鼻内镜下动力系统切割器行腺样体切除术无1例腺样体残留及并发症。结论鼻内镜下动力系统切割器经口腺样体切除术是治疗腺样体肥大的最好手术方式。
|
| 关 键 词： | 腺样体肥大 鼻内镜 动力系统切割器 手术方式 比较研究 |
Comparative study on dynamical system cutterbar via nasal endoscope for adenoidectomy and rout curettage of adenoids |
| |
| Institution: | HUANG Ying-hong, ZHANG Jian-guo, HUANG Min-qi, et al (Department of otorhinolaryngology, Second Affiliated hospital of Guangzhou Medical College , Guangzhou 510260, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of dynamical system cutterbar via nasal endoscope for adenoidectomy by mouth and rout curet-tage of adenoids. Methods 136 cases with adenoid hypertrophy, 69 cases underwent dynamical system cutterbar via nasal endoscope for adenoidectomy by mouth while 67 cases were performed by rout curettage of adenoids. Then compared the curative effect with two groups. Results 8 cases had adenoid residual ,3 cases had complication(bleeding or the impairment of ostium tubae anditive) in the rout curettage of adenoids group. No adenoid residual or other complication had been noted in dynamical system cutterbar via nasal endoscope for adenoidectomy by mouth group. Conclusion Dynamical system cutterbar via nasal endoscope for adenoidectomy by mouth is the best way to cure adenoid hypertrophy in present time. |
| |
| Keywords: | Adenoid Hypertrophy: Nasal endoscope Dynamical system cutterbar Modus operandi Comparative study |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
