四川省城乡居民SF—36评价参考值

目的 制定36条目简明量表（SF-36）参考值用于国内生命质量评价。方法 采用美国的评分标准及中国评分标准分别对四川省1603名农村居民和646名城市居民的生命质量进行评价，并与香港及美国常模比较。结果 中国评分标准与美国美国评分标准所得结果高度相关，8个领域的相关系数均在0.98以上，但两种评分标准所得结果的差异有显著性；四川省城乡居民SF-36评价结果与香港及美国常模比较，更接近香港评价值；不同年龄、性别及城乡人群之间的评分结果有显著性差异。结论 制定了四川省城乡不同性别及年龄居民的SF-36评价参考值，为在国内使用SF-36作为生命质量评价工具奠定了基础。

The norms of SF-36 scale scores in urban and rural residents of Sichuan province]

OBJECTIVE: To develop the norms of SF-36 in Sichuan, China. METHODS: A total of 1603 rural residents and 646 urban residents were surveyed. Both the US scaling criteria and China scaling criteria were used to score the 8 domains of the SF-36 and compared with the norms of Hong Kong and US populations. RESULTS: The scores of the 8 domains of the SF-36 using China scaling criteria were highly correlated with those using the US scaling criteria, with correlation coefficients greater than 0.98, however, the mean scores using the two scaling criteria were different significantly. The norms of the Sichuan population were more similar to the Hong Kong norms than the US norms. The scores of the SF-36 were different between different age and sex groups and between urban and rural populations. CONCLUSION: We have developed the norms of SF-36 by age/sex groups in urban and rural population of Sichuan, China.