首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

转院方式对ST段抬高心肌梗死患者直接PCI及其预后的影响
引用本文:梅健,何凌宇,王岩,王磊,项军,刘成.转院方式对ST段抬高心肌梗死患者直接PCI及其预后的影响[J].徐州医学院学报,2014(9):620-623.
作者姓名:梅健  何凌宇  王岩  王磊  项军  刘成
作者单位:中国人民解放军第97医院心血管内科,江苏 徐州,221004
摘    要:目的:比较农村地区院间不同转院方式对ST段抬高心肌梗死( STEMI)患者再灌注及其预后的影响。方法回顾性调查2011年1月至2013年7月间入院、农村地区发病、6 h内完成首次医疗接触( FMC)并转诊到本院的STEMI患者155例,根据院间转运方式分为基层医院直接转院组(直接转院组)及经一、二级医院逐级转院组(间接转院组),比较2组间早期再灌注情况及住院病死率。结果直接转院组64例、逐级转院组91例;直接转院组中发病12 h内患者接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)率高于间接转院组(64.1% vs.30.8%,P<0.001),直接PCI比非直接PCI的OR=4.025(95% CI 1.934~8.377,P=0.000),总缺血时间较短〔(6.92±1.89)h vs.(9.37±1.66)h,P<0.001〕。直接转院组住院死亡1例,逐级转院组住院死亡6例,2组间病死率无显著性差异(1.6%vs.6.6%,P=0.241),死亡患者均未接受PCI。结论 FMC后的STEMI患者转院至具备PCI条件的医疗单位有较高的直接PCI率;逐级转院方式使更多的患者延迟至12 h以后到达三级医院。

关 键 词:ST段抬高心肌梗死  转运  再灌注  经皮冠状动脉介入治疗

The impact of inter-hospital transfer methods on the prognosis of patients with STEMI and primary PCI treatment
MEI Jian,HE Lingyu,WANG Yan,WANG Lei,XIANG Jun,LIU Chen.The impact of inter-hospital transfer methods on the prognosis of patients with STEMI and primary PCI treatment[J].Acta Academiae Medicinae Xuzhou,2014(9):620-623.
Authors:MEI Jian  HE Lingyu  WANG Yan  WANG Lei  XIANG Jun  LIU Chen
Institution:MEI Jian, HE Lingyu, WANG Yan, WANG Lei, XIANG Jun, LIU Chen (Department of Cardiology, the 97th of Hospital of PLA, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221004, China)
Abstract:Objective To compare the impact of inter -hospital transfer methods in the rural area on the prognosis of patients with ST -elevation myocardial infarction ( STEMI ) and primary percutaneous coronary intervention ( PCI ) treatment.Method A retrospective survey was made of 155 consecutive STEMI patients , who with the onset of STEMI within 6 h had completed the first medical contacts , been admitted to rural area hospitals and then referred to our hospi-tal.Based on inter-hospital transfer method , the patients were divided into two groups:direct referral first class hospital group and first taken to a secondary class hospital and later transferred to first class hospital group .This study was to compare two groups of early reperfusion time and in -hospital mortality rate .Results Sixty-four cases of STEMI were in direct referral group , 91 cases in indirect referral group .Compared with that in indirect referral group , the rate of the patients received primary PCI within 12 h of onset time was higher in direct referral group (64.1% vs.30.8%, P〈0.001).Primary PCI vs.non-primary PCI OR was 4.025 (95%CI, 1.934-8.377;P=0.000).The total ischemic time from the onset of myocardial infarction to reperfusion was shorter (6.92 ±1.89) h vs.(9.37 ±1.66) h, P〈0.001].There was no significant difference in in -hospital mortality between the two groups (1.6% vs.6.6%; P=0.241).All of the patients who died did not undergo PCI .Conclusion The patients with STEMI who are transferred directly to a first class hospital capable of PCI treatment after the first medical contact have a higher rate of primary PCI treatment.The referral of such cases to a non -PCI capable hospital leads to delay arrival of 12 h after the onset of STEMI to a first class hospital capable of PCI treatment .
Keywords:ST-elevation myocardial infarction  transfer  reperfusion  percutaneous coronary intervention
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号