首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

临床评估五种膜式氧合器在不同温度下的跨膜压差
引用本文:刘瑞芳,邢家林,缪娜,柳薇,吉冰洋.临床评估五种膜式氧合器在不同温度下的跨膜压差[J].中国体外循环杂志,2009,7(2):89-92.
作者姓名:刘瑞芳  邢家林  缪娜  柳薇  吉冰洋
作者单位:首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院体外循环科,北京,100029
摘    要:目的评估五种中空纤维膜式氧合器(HFMO)在体外循环(CPB)中不同温度下的跨膜压差(TMPD)。方法40例择期CPB下行心脏直视手术患者依据使用HFMO的不同随机分为五组(每组8例):A组(Affinty),C组(Cobe),J组(Jostra),P组(Polystan)和T组(Terumo)。在CPB全流量后(T1)、最低温度时(T2)、复温后(T3)监测灌注流量、鼻咽温度、红细胞比积、平均动脉压,并在HFMO的入口和出口处监测压力的变化。结果各组术前的临床参数没有显著性差异(P〉0.05)。TMPD在不同的时点J组为最小,其他依次分别为A组〈P组〈T组〈C组,J组和A组与其他三组相比均较小(P〈0.01),且J组在T2时点明显低于A组(P〈0.01),P组在T1时点明显低于C组(P〈0.01)外,在其他时点各组间相比没有显著性差异(P〉0.05)。A组、P组和T组在低温过程中的TMPD分别高于T1和T3,但没有显著性差异(P〉0.05)。结论J组和A组的TMPD较低可能更有利于减少对血细胞的破坏,更适合应用于CPB时间较长的心脏手术。

关 键 词:膜式氧合器  跨膜压差  体外循环  温度

Evaluate the Trans-membrane Pressure Drop of Five Type Membrane Oxygenator in Different Temperatures
LIU Riu-fang,XING Jia-lin,MIAO Na,LIU Wei,JI Bing-yang.Evaluate the Trans-membrane Pressure Drop of Five Type Membrane Oxygenator in Different Temperatures[J].Chinese Journal of Extracorporeal Circulation,2009,7(2):89-92.
Authors:LIU Riu-fang  XING Jia-lin  MIAO Na  LIU Wei  JI Bing-yang
Institution:LIU Ri - fang, XING Jia - lin, MIAO Na, LIU Wei, JI Bing - yang (Depart. CPB of Capital Medical University Affiliated Belting Anzhen Hospital, Beijing 100029, China)
Abstract:OBJECTIVE To evaluate five type commercial available oxygenators of the trans - membrane pressure drop (TMPD) during normothermic and hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). METHODS Forty patients scheduled for cardiac surgery participated this study and were divided into five groups ( n = 8 ,in per - group) according to type of oxygenators used during CPB: group J (Joatra Quardox), group A (Affinity NT), group P (Polystan Safe Maxi ), group T (Terumo Capiox SX) and group C (COBE APEX -TM). Parameters were collected during CPB including mean arterial pressure, pump flow, temperature, hematecrit and TMPD at pre - and post -oxygenator during normothermic(T1 ), hypot- hermic,28 ℃ (T2) and after rewarming (T3). RESULTS There was no significant difference among five groups in pre - operative clinical parameters ( P 〉 0.05). TMPDs of group J were the lowest in different time - points, followed by the other group were group A 〈 group P 〈 group T 〈 group C. TMPD of group J and A compared to the other three groups were lower ( P 〈 0.01 ) respectively and J was significant lower than group A at T2 ( P 〈 0.01 ). Except TMPDs of group P were significantly lower than group C ( P 〈 0.01 ) at T1, there were no statistical significance ( P 〉 0.05) in various time -points. Although TMPDs in group A, P and T during T2 were higher than T1 and T3, but there were no statistical significance ( P 〉 0.05) in various time - points. CONCLUSION The TMPD of HFMOs in group J and A produced significantly lower and during normothermic and hypothermic CPB, thus blood trauma with these two HFMOs during CPB may be significantly lower compared to the other three.
Keywords:Membrane oxygenato  Pressure drop  Cardiopulmonary bypass  Hyperthermia
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号