首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

环形切除钉合术与传统外剥内扎术治疗痔的疗效对比分析
引用本文:李守付,杨关根.环形切除钉合术与传统外剥内扎术治疗痔的疗效对比分析[J].复旦学报(医学版),2010,37(3):339-342.
作者姓名:李守付  杨关根
作者单位:安徽医科大学杭州临床学院,杭州310009;杭州市第三人民医院肛肠科,杭州310009
摘    要: 目的 对痔上黏膜环形切除钉合术(procedure for proplapse and hemorrhoids,PPH)和传统外剥内扎术治疗Ⅲ、Ⅳ度内痔与混合痔的疗效进行对比分析。方法 采用对照研究,将100例Ⅲ、Ⅳ度内痔及混合痔患者随机分成PPH组和传统外剥内扎术组,每组50例。对两组手术时间、疼痛持续时间、住院时间、术后并发症、住院费用以及疗效进行比较。结果 PPH组的手术时间、疼痛持续时间、住院时间、术后并发症均低于传统外剥内扎组,而PPH组的住院总费用高于传统手术组。结论 PPH是一种治疗Ⅲ、Ⅳ度内痔和混合痔安全有效的方法。

关 键 词:  外科手术  随机对照实验
收稿时间:2009-7-30

A randomised controlled study of procedure for proplapse and hemorrhoids and milligan-morgan procedure
LI Shou-fu,YANG Guan-gen.A randomised controlled study of procedure for proplapse and hemorrhoids and milligan-morgan procedure[J].Fudan University Journal of Medical Sciences,2010,37(3):339-342.
Authors:LI Shou-fu  YANG Guan-gen
Institution:Institute of Hangzhou Clinical, Anhui Medical University, Hangzhou 310009, Zhejiang Province, China; Department of proctology, the Third People’s Hospital of Hangzhou, Hangzhou 310009, Zhejiang Province, China
Abstract:Objective To compare the outcome of procedure for proplapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) and milligan-morgan procedure. Methods One hundred cases of the Ⅲ, Ⅳ degree internal and mixed hemorrhoid patients were randomly devided into PPH group (n=50) and milligan-morgan procedure group (n=50) to compare their opernating time, postoperative pain, length of hospital stay, hospital fees, postoperative complications and efficacy. Results Operation time, postoperative pain, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications in PPH group were lower than those in milligan-morgan procedure group, while hospital fee on the contrary. Conclusions PPH is a safe and effective treatment in the management of the Ⅲ, Ⅳ degree internal and mixed hemorrhoids.
Keywords:hemorrhoids  surgical procedures  randomized controlled trial  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《复旦学报(医学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《复旦学报(医学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号