首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

中医药治疗中风研究文献的质量评价
引用本文:郭新峰,赖世隆,杨小波,李先涛,温泽淮,梁伟雄.中医药治疗中风研究文献的质量评价[J].广州中医药大学学报,2000,17(1):15-19.
作者姓名:郭新峰  赖世隆  杨小波  李先涛  温泽淮  梁伟雄
作者单位:1. 广州中医药大学,广州,510405
2. 广州中医药大学DME中心,广州,510405
3. 广州中医药大学第二附属医院,广州,510120
基金项目:国家科技攻关项目,96-903-01-11,
摘    要:目的:对中风的中医药临床治疗性文献进行科研设计质量的分析。方法:按照临床流行病学/DME原则,制订《中风医药临床研究文献评价表》,经测试其重复性较好(主要条目Kappa值为0.46-0.48,中度);用其对1992-1996年的中风中医药临床临床治疗性文献进行评价。结果:28.4%的研究采用了随机对照方法,但随机的质量和可信度较差;盲法极少被采用;

关 键 词:中风  中医药疗法  研究文献  质量评价
修稿时间:1999-11-15

Quality Analysis of Literature of Traditional Chinese Medicine on Clinical Study of Stroke
GUO Xinfeng,LAI Shilong,YANG Xiaobo,LI Xiantao,WEN Zehuai,LIANG Weixiong.Quality Analysis of Literature of Traditional Chinese Medicine on Clinical Study of Stroke[J].Journal of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2000,17(1):15-19.
Authors:GUO Xinfeng  LAI Shilong  YANG Xiaobo  LI Xiantao  WEN Zehuai  LIANG Weixiong
Abstract:To evaluate the quality of TCM literature on clinical study of stroke, the evaluating scale for TCM literature on clinical study of stroke with good reproducibility was designed (Kappa of the main item varies from 0.46 to 0.48 ) and was used to evaluate TCM literature on clinical study of stroke from 1992 to 1996. Randomized controlled clinical trial was adopted in 28.4 %,but the quality and credibility of randomization was relatively poor. Blinded methods were seldom used and some problems were noticed in the baseline comparison, the choice of the outcome indicator, publishing bias, etc. The choice of the outcome indicator of stroke and the methodological difficulties of TCM clinical study, and its possible resolutions were also discussed.
Keywords:STROKE/TCM therapy  STROKE/TCD therapy  STROKE/TCM-WM therapy  MED PHARMACOL LITERATURE TCM  QUALITY  ACQUIREMENT  EVLVATION  @EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号