齐刺滞针经筋疗法治疗颈型颈椎病的临床观察

【目的】观察齐刺滞针经筋疗法治疗颈型颈椎病的临床疗效。【方法】将60例颈型颈椎病患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组各30例,治疗组给予齐刺滞针经筋疗法治疗,对照组给予针刺治疗。治疗10次为1个疗程。治疗1个疗程后,评价2组患者的临床疗效,观察2组患者治疗前后视觉模拟评分量表(VAS)评分的变化情况,比较颈椎功能障碍指数调查问卷(NDI)评分的变化情况。【结果】(1)治疗组总有效率为96.67%(29/30),对照组为86.67%(26/30)。治疗组疗效优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。(2)治疗后,2组患者的VAS评分均明显改善(P<0.05),且治疗组在改善VAS评分方面明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组患者VAS评分治疗前后差值比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。(3)治疗后,2组患者的NDI评分均明显改善(P<0.01),且治疗组在改善NDI评分均方面明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组患者NDI评分治疗前后差值比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。【结论】齐刺滞针经筋疗法治疗颈型颈椎病,能明显改善患者的颈椎功能,缓解患者的疼痛症状,疗效显著。

Clinical Observation on Neck Type Cervical Spondylosis Treated by Multi-needling and Sticking of Needle in Muscle Meridian Focus

Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of multi-needling and sticking of needle in muscle meridian focus in treating neck type cervical spondylosis. Methods Sixty cases of neck type of cervical spondylosis were randomly divided into the treatment group and the control group,with 30 cases in each group. The treatment group was given multi-needling and sticking of needle in muscle meridian focus, while the control group was given acupuncture therapy, ten times as one course of treatment and the treatment lasting one course. The clinical efficacy of the two groups was evaluated,the changes of Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)score were observed before and after treatment, and the changes of Neck Disability index(NDI)score were compared. Results The total effective rate was 96.7% in the treatment group and 86.7% in the control group. The therapeutic effect of the treatment group was superior to that of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).(2)After treatment,VAS scores in both groups were significantly improved(P<0.05),and VAS scores in the treatment group were significantly superior to those in the control group,the difference being statistical significance(P<0.05). The difference of VAS scores between the two groups before and after treatment was statistically significant(P<0.05).(3)After treatment, the NDI scores of the two groups were significantly improved(P<0.01), and the treatment group was significantly superior to the control group in improving NDI scores, the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). The difference of NDI scores between the two groups before and after treatment was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion Multi-needling and sticking of needle in muscle meridian focus has significant therapeutic effect in treating neck type cervical spondylosis by improving cervical function and relieve the pain symptoms of patients.