游离端附着体义齿和可摘局部义齿修复后患者主观评价的调查研究

目的比较牙列末端游离缺损的患者对卡环可摘局部义齿和冠外附着体义齿两种修复方式的主观评价。方法选择20例下颌牙列末端游离缺损的患者，每个患者分别在卡环可摘局部义齿和附着体义齿修复后，通过问卷调查，比较两种修复方式的修复效果。结果在咀嚼功能、固位稳定和美观方面，附着体义齿明显好于传统可摘局部义齿，在发音和舒适方面二者差异无统计学意义，在取戴方面传统卡环可摘局部义齿明显优于精密附着体义齿。结论对于牙列未端游离缺损的患者，与传统可摘局部义齿相比，冠外附着体义齿修复能更好地满足患者需求，提供良好的修复效果。

The comparative study on patient's subjective evaluaion with attachment dentures and clasp dentures.

Objective To compare the patient＇s subjective evaluation on the attachment dentures and the clasp dentures. Methods Followed up 20 mandibular distal-extension cases, to survey the patient＇ s attitudes after repaired with attachment dentures and clasp dentures through questionnaires. Results Regarding to the masticatory function, fixedness, stabilization and beauty, there were significant different between the attachment dentures and the clasp dentures ;regarding to the pronunciation and comfort, the clasp dentures is better than the attachment dentures. Conclusion Compare with the tradition removable partial dentures, the attachment dentures obtain better restore effect to distal-extension defect.