首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

对比分析改良右半结肠切除术和传统根治术治疗结肠癌的临床效果
引用本文:董宇.对比分析改良右半结肠切除术和传统根治术治疗结肠癌的临床效果[J].中外医疗,2016(19):75-77.
作者姓名:董宇
作者单位:江苏省徐州市铜山区中医院普外科,江苏徐州,221116
摘    要:目的:对比分析改良右半结肠切除术和传统根治术治疗结肠癌的临床效果。方法选择该院2014年1—12月收治的结肠癌患者为研究对象,随机抽取120例,分为实验组和对照组每组60例,实验组采用改良右半结肠切除术,而针对对照组所实施的治疗方法为传统的根治手术治疗;结合实验组和对照组两组的治疗效果以及预后情况进行对比分析。结果实验组手术时间为(69.59±10.2)min,对照组手术时间为(86.32±20.54)min,实验组明显小于对照组;实验组和对照组肠道功能恢复时间分别为(73.25±38.45)h、(81.12±40.12)h;平均住院时间较短,根据数据统计,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。手术中淋巴清扫个数两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论改良右半结肠切除术的手术效果明显优于传统根治术,值得广泛应用。

关 键 词:改良右半结肠切除术  传统根治术  结肠癌

Comparative Analysis Improved Right-side Colon Resection and Traditional Radical Clinical Effect for the Treatment of Colon Cancer
Abstract:Objective To analysis of improved right-side colon resection and traditional radical clinical effect for the treat-ment of colon cancer.Methods Our hospital of colon cancer patients as the research object, and 120 cases of random divid-ed into experimental group and the control group, each group of 60 people, improved experimental group adopted the right colon resection, the control group treated with traditional radical, comparison and analysis the therapeutic effect and progno-sis of two groups of patients. Results (69.59 ± 10.2) operation time of experimental group, control group, operation time was (86.32 ± 20.54), the experimental group significantly less than the control group; in the experimental group and the control group, intestinal function recovery time were (73.25 ± 38.45), (81.12 ± 40.12);shorter average length of stay, according to the statistical data were was statistically significant (P< 0.05). The number of lymph nodes were no significant differences in operation (P>0.05). Conclusion Modified right-side colon resection effect is superior to the traditional radical surgery, is worth wide application.
Keywords:The modified right hemicolectomy  Traditional radical surgery  Colon cancer
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号