三种方法修复后牙牙体缺损的疗效比较 |
| |
引用本文: | 季从容,刘红红,钱昌富,魏莉.三种方法修复后牙牙体缺损的疗效比较[J].安徽医科大学学报,2017,52(5). |
| |
作者姓名: | 季从容 刘红红 钱昌富 魏莉 |
| |
作者单位: | 安徽医科大学第三附属医院口腔科,合肥,230061;安徽医科大学附属省立医院口腔科,合肥,230001 |
| |
基金项目: | 安徽省自然科学基金项目 |
| |
摘 要: | 比较二氧化锆全瓷嵌体、钴铬合金高嵌体烤瓷冠和钴铬合金烤瓷全冠修复治疗后牙牙体缺损的临床疗效.选择141例累及邻面的后牙牙体缺损牙齿180 颗,随机分成3组,分别制作钴铬合金高嵌体烤瓷冠和钴铬合金烤瓷全冠及二氧化锆全瓷嵌体进行修复,在修复后1年复诊,观察修复效果.高嵌体组和全冠组在修复体完整性、有无继发龋方面与嵌体组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),高嵌体组在固位稳定性上更优于全冠组(P<0.05).后牙牙体缺损的修复治疗,全冠、高嵌体冠优于嵌体修复,而高嵌体冠更有利于固位稳定,更加适用于大面积牙体缺损的修复.
|
关 键 词: | 嵌体 高嵌体冠 全冠 根管治疗 |
Comparison of the three methods of repairing the posterior tooth defects |
| |
Abstract: | To compare the clinical effect of posterior tooth-defection restoring with zirconium oxide inlay,cobalt-chromium(co-cr) alloy onlay crown and co-cr porcelain-fused-to-metal(PFM) crown.180 posterior molars with proximal surface defection from 141 patients were randomly divided into three groups, which were restorated by zirconium oxide inlay,co-cr alloy onlay crown and co-cr PFM.The clinical effect of restoration were evaluated after one year.Onlay crown group and crown group showed a statistically significant ance superior to inlay group in prosteses integrity, secondary caries(P<0.05).Onlay group showed a stronger retention force than that of crown group(P<0.05).Crown group and onlay crown group is superior to inlay group in restoring posterior tooth-defection.Onlay group has a better advantage in fracture resistance and could be used in extensive posterior tooth-defection. |
| |
Keywords: | inlay onlay crown crown root canal therapy |
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录! |
|