首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Health Economic Benefits and Quality of Life During Improved Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Trial
Authors:Testa  Marcia A; Simonson  Donald C
Abstract:Context.— Although the long-term health benefits of good glycemic control in patients with diabetes are well documented, shorter-term quality of life (QOL) and economic savings generally have been reported to be minimal or absent. Objective.— To examine short-term outcomes of glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). Design.— Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel trial. Setting.— Sixty-two sites in the United States. Participants.— A total of 569 male and female volunteers with type 2 DM. Intervention.— After a 3-week, single-blind placebo-washout period, participants were randomized to diet and titration with either 5 to 20 mg of glipizide gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) (n=377) or placebo (n=192) for 12 weeks. Main Outcome Measures.— Change from baseline in glucose and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels and symptom distress, QOL, and health economic indicators by questionnaires and diaries. Results.— After 12 weeks, mean (±SE) HbA1c and fasting blood glucose levels decreased with active therapy (glipizide GITS) vs placebo (7.5%±0.1% vs 9.3%±0.1% and 7.0±0.1 mmol/L 126±2 mg/dL] vs 9.3±0.2 mmol/L 168±4 mg/dL], respectively; P<.001). Quality-of-life treatment differences (SD units) for symptom distress (+0.59; P<.001), general perceived health (+0.36; P=.004), cognitive functioning (+0.34; P=.005), and the overall visual analog scale (VAS) (+0.24; P=.04) were significantly more favorable for active therapy. Subscales of acuity (+0.38; P=.002), VAS emotional health (+0.35; P =.003), general health (+0.27; P =.01), sleep (+0.26; P =.04), depression (+0.25; P =.05), disorientation and detachment (+0.23; P =.05), and vitality (+0.22; P =.04) were most affected. Favorable health economic outcomes for glipizide GITS included higher retained employment (97% vs 85%; P<.001), greater productive capacity (99% vs 87%; P<.001), less absenteeism (losses=$24 vs $115 per worker per month; P <.001), fewer bed-days (losses=$1539 vs $1843 per 1000 person-days; P=.05), and fewer restricted-activity days (losses=$2660 vs $4275 per 1000 person-days; P=.01). Conclusions.— Improved glycemic control of type 2 DM is associated with substantial short-term symptomatic, QOL, and health economic benefits.
Keywords:
点击此处可从《The Journal of the American Medical Association》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《The Journal of the American Medical Association》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号