首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

2464例高血压脑出血外科治疗多中心单盲研究
作者姓名:Zhao JZ  Zhou DB  Zhou LF  Wang RZ  Wang DJ  Wang S  Yuan G  Kang S  Zhao YL  Ji N  Ye X
作者单位:1. 100050,首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院神经外科
2. 中国人民解放军总医院神经外科
3. 复旦大学附属华山医院神经外科
4. 北京协和医院神经外科
基金项目:国家“十五”科技攻关课题基金资助项目(2001BA703816)
摘    要:目的对比高血压脑出血的传统开颅、CT引导血肿吸引和微骨窗入路三种手术方法,分析手术疗效。方法2001年9月至2003年11月10日,国内135家医疗单位手术治疗2464例出血性脑卒中病例,完成3个月随访,采用多中心单盲研究方法比较不同手术方式疗效。结果2464例中传统组639例,微骨窗组409例,吸引组1416例。1个月累计病死率19.3%,3个月累计病死率21.1%。术前Glasgow昏迷评分(GCS)≤8分的病人,术后3个月病死率是GCS≥8分的3.5倍;术后有并发症者,术后3个月病死率是无并发症者的4.4倍;丘脑出血术后3个月病死率是皮层出血病人的2.4倍。3个月的病死率传统组(24.6%)高于微骨窗组(17.6%)和吸引组(20.6%)。三组间术后并发症,传统组(29.9%)与吸引组(24.8%)差异具有统计学意义(P=0.015)。结论微骨窗入路及CT引导吸引术组治疗高血压脑出血的手术病死率与致残率,以及预后的改善情况,优于传统开颅组。

关 键 词:颅内出血  高血压性  微创神经外科  颅骨切开术  CT引导吸引术  微骨窗入路  高血压脑出血  外科治疗  多中心  Glasgow昏迷评分
收稿时间:2005-02-22
修稿时间:2005-02-22

The efficacy of three different approaches in treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage: a multi-center single-blind study of 2464 patients
Zhao JZ,Zhou DB,Zhou LF,Wang RZ,Wang DJ,Wang S,Yuan G,Kang S,Zhao YL,Ji N,Ye X.The efficacy of three different approaches in treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage: a multi-center single-blind study of 2464 patients[J].National Medical Journal of China,2005,85(32):2238-2242.
Authors:Zhao Ji-zong  Zhou Ding-biao  Zhou Liang-fu  Wang Ren-zhi  Wang De-jiang  Wang Shuo  Yuan Ge  Kang Shuai  Zhao Yuan-li  Ji Nan  Ye Xun
Institution:Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital University of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100050, China.
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and indications of the 3 approaches: conventional open craniotomy (COC), computed-tomography guided aspiration (CTGA), and key-hole approach (KHA) in neurosurgical management for hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH). METHODS: The clinical data of HICH 2464 patients, aged 14 - 75, operated on within 24 hours after stroke, with a Glasgow coma score >or= 5, hospitalized in 135 hospitals all over the mainland of China, were collected and underwent single-blind study. RESULTS: Among the 2464 patients 639 underwent COC, 1416 underwent CTGA, and 409 were operated on via KHA. The overall mortality rates within one and three months after operation were 19.3% and 21.1% respectively. The mortality rate within 3 months after operation (M3m) of the patient with a GCS or= 8. The M3m of the patients with complications was 4.4 times as much as that of the patients without complications. The M3m of the patients with hemorrhage in thalamus was 2.4 times as much as that of the patients with cortical hemorrhage. The M3m of the COC group was 24.6%, higher than those of the KHA group (17.6%) and CTGA group (20,6%). The postoperative complication rate of the COC group was 29.9%, significantly higher than that of the CTGA group (24.8%, P = 0.015). There were no significant differences in postoperative complication rate between the COC and KHA groups and between the CTGA and KHA groups (both P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: KHA and CTGA are both better than COC in treatment of HICH with more favorable outcome and less postoperative mortality and morbidity.
Keywords:Intracranial hemorrhage  hypertensive  Minimally invasive neurosurgery  Craniotomy  Computed tomography guided aspiration  Key-hole approach
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号