首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

联合应用脐动脉血流仪、无负荷试验及B超监测产前脐带缠绕
引用本文:赵淑萍,戴红英,邵冬红,张永华.联合应用脐动脉血流仪、无负荷试验及B超监测产前脐带缠绕[J].中华医学杂志,2001,81(8):468-471.
作者姓名:赵淑萍  戴红英  邵冬红  张永华
作者单位:青岛大学医学院附属医院妇产科,
摘    要:目的探讨彩色多普勒脐动脉血流仪(CDFI)、无负荷试验(NST)及B超检查3种方法联合使用,对产前脐带缠绕的预测价值.方法对1860例孕周为37~42周的孕妇于产前1~2周内联合应用CDFI、NST及B超进行监测,筛查胎儿有无脐带缠绕.结果脐带缠绕发生率为23.23%(432/1860),阳性预测值及阴性预测值分别为95.4%(412/432)及98.6%(1408/1428),准确率为97.8%(1820/1860).脐带缠绕并不增加新生儿低评分危险,脐带绕身绕四肢组胎儿宫内窘迫发生率为85.29%(29/34);剖宫产率为88.28%(30/34);而脐带绕颈组胎儿宫内窘迫发生率为13.06%(52/398),剖宫产率为44.94%(178/398).脐带绕身绕四肢组胎儿宫内窘迫及剖宫产率明显高于脐带绕颈组(X2分别为107.27、23.76,P<0.001),脐带绕颈组脐动脉血流收缩期与舒张期峰值比值基本波动于正常范围.在胎心监护中,脐带缠绕多以变异减速波型表现,其次为早期减速(ED)、NST无反应及催产素激惹试验(OCT)出现晚期减速(LD),脐带绕身绕四肢者还出现延长减速(PD)波型.结论联合应用CDFI、NST及B超对孕妇进行监测,对脐带缠绕的诊断具有重要辅助价值,能显著提高诊断阳性率,为分娩方式的选择提供有价值的参考.

关 键 词:胎儿监测  产前诊断  脐带缠绕  B超  脐动脉血流仪  无负荷试验
修稿时间:2000年11月27

Predictive value of combined application of umbilical arter color Doppler velocimetry,nonstress testing and ultrasonography in monitoring umbilical cord entanglement
ZHAO Shuping,DAI Hongying,SHAO Donghong,et al..Predictive value of combined application of umbilical arter color Doppler velocimetry,nonstress testing and ultrasonography in monitoring umbilical cord entanglement[J].National Medical Journal of China,2001,81(8):468-471.
Authors:ZHAO Shuping  DAI Hongying  SHAO Donghong  
Institution:Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, China.
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To explore the predictive value of combined application of umbilical artery color Doppler flow monitoring (CDFI), nonstress testing (NST) and ultrasonography in monitoring umbilical cord entanglement. METHODS: 1 860 cases of pregnant women between gestational ages of 37 approximately 42 weeks were studied 1 approximately 2 weeks before delivery by CDFI, nonstress testing (NST) and ultrasonography to monitor umbilical cord entanglement. RESULTS: The prevalence rate of umbilical cord entanglement was 23.23% (432/1 860). Positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 95.4 % (412/432) and 98.6% (1 408/1 428) respectively. The rate of accuracy was 97.8% (1 820/1 860). The rate of fetal distress among the fetuses with umbilical cord round the body or four limbs was 85.29% (23/34) and the incidence of cesarean section in this group was 88.28% (30/34). The rate of fetal distress among the fetuses with umbilical cord round the neck was 13.06% (52/398) and the incidence of cesarean section in this group was 44.94% (178/398). The rates of fetal distress and cesarean section were significantly higher in the group with umbilical cord around the body or four limbs than in the group with umbilical cord around the neck (chi(2) = 107.27 and 23.76 respectively, P < 0.001). The systolic/diastolic (S/D) ratio was basically in normal ranges in the group with the umbilical cord round the neck. In cardiotopography (CTG), umbilical cord entanglement mainly showed variable deceleration (VD), early deceleration (ED), nonreaction on NST, and late deceleration (LD) on oxytocin challenge test (OCT). Prolonged fetal heart rate deceleration (PD) could be seen in the group with umbilical cord around the body or four limbs. CONCLUSION: The combined application of umbilical artery color Doppler velocimetry, nonstress testing and ultrasonography have an important auxiliary value in monitoring umbilical cord entanglement. It remarkably increases the positive predictive rate as a valuable reference for the choice of delivery form.
Keywords:Fetal monitoring  Prenatal diagnosis  Umbilical cord
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号