利奈唑胺万古霉素治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染的疗效及安全性分析

目的:探讨利奈唑胺与万古霉素治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)肺炎的疗效以及安全性.方法:收集2016年1月至2017年3月入院的60例耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)肺炎的患者采用随机数字表法分为两组,对照组患者给予万古霉素进行治疗,实验组患者则给予利奈唑胺进行治疗,比较两组患者总体治疗有效率、治疗前以及治疗后血白细胞浓度、血液C反应蛋白浓度以及两组患者不良反应(率)发生情况比较.结果:不同治疗方法:经过卡方检验,实验组较对照组患者临床总有效率比较,实验组显著升高,差异显著,具有显著统计学意义(P<0.01);不同治疗方法:经过t检验,治疗前两组WBC以及CRP比较,差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后两组WBC以及CRP指标均较治疗前明显降低,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),且治疗后观察组WBC以及CRP指标均明显低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);实验组与对照组患者不良反应比较,总不良反应率差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05),而实验组患者主要以腹泻、恶心等胃肠道不良反应为主,对照组患者主要以皮肤反应、肾功能障碍不良反应为主.结论:利奈唑胺治疗MRSA肺炎患者的效果较万古霉素而言,利奈唑胺降低炎症细胞、控制炎症反应效果都更好,治疗总有效率更高,利奈唑胺治疗主要以腹泻、恶心等胃肠道不良反应为主,而万古霉素治疗患者主要以皮肤反应、肾功能障碍不良反应为主,两组不良反应较少,安全性较高,值得临床推广,具有借鉴性.

The Effect and Safety of Linezolid and Vancomycin on Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Infection

Objective:To investigate the efficacy and safety of linezolid and vancomycin in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ( MRSA) pneumonia. Methods: 60 patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ( MRSA ) pneumonia were enrolled from January 2016 to March 2017 were randomly divided into two groups according to the random number table. The patients in the control group were treated with vancomycin, The patients in the experimental group were treated with linezolid, and the overall treatment efficiency, the white blood cell concentration before treatment and the concentration of C-reactive protein and the incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results:Compared with the control group, the total effective rate of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P <0.01). After treatment, WBC and CRP were significantly lower than those before treat-ment, the difference was significant, and there was no significant difference between the two groups before and after treatment.WBC and CRP were significantly lower than those in the control group (P <0.05). There was no significant difference in the adverse reaction rate between the experimental group and the control group, ( P> 0.05) , while the experimental group of patients mainly diarrhea, nausea and other gastrointestinal adverse reactions, the control group of patients mainly to skin reactions, renal dysfunction adverse reactions. Conclu-sion:The efficacy of linezolid in the treatment of MRSA pneumonia is lower than that of vancomycin, and it is better to control inflammatory response, and the total effective rate of treatment is higher. The treatment of lin-ezolid is mainly caused by diarrhea, nausea and so on. Gastrointestinal adverse reactions, and vancomycin treatment of patients mainly to skin reactions, renal dysfunction adverse reactions, two groups of less adverse reactions, higher safety, worthy of clinical promotion, with reference.