首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

临床医学研究生学习行为的预测模型研究———线性回归和机器学习的对比分析
引用本文:张驰,李彦青,刘德平,王培忠,陈畑至,李文卓,贾金忠.临床医学研究生学习行为的预测模型研究———线性回归和机器学习的对比分析[J].中华医学教育探索杂志,2021,20(3):350-355.
作者姓名:张驰  李彦青  刘德平  王培忠  陈畑至  李文卓  贾金忠
作者单位:1北京医院教育处/国家老年医学中心/中国医学科学院老年医学研究院 100730;2北京师范大学教育学部 100875;3北京大学公共卫生学院卫生政策与管理学系 100191;4北京大学研究生院医学部分院/全国医学专业学位研究生教育指导委员会秘书处办公室 100191
基金项目:中国学位与研究生教育学会重点课题(A2-2017Y0502-005);中国学位与研究生教育学会医学专业学位委员会立项课题(A1-YX20180201-02);中国学位与研究生教育学会立项课题(B1-YX20190201-01)。
摘    要:目的对比线性回归模型与四种机器学习算法对临床医学研究生学习行为的预测效能,探讨不同预测模型的优缺点和适用性。方法以全国6922名临床医学研究生的调查数据为例,通过自评学习行为量表获得综合得分;在训练集中,分别利用Lasso线性回归和人工神经网络、决策树、Bootstrap随机森林、提升树四种监督式机器学习算法建立预测模型;对验证集数据进行预测并比较不同模型的预测效能。结果临床医学研究生学习行为综合得分为(3.31±0.54),总体达标率为74.02%。在线性回归模型中,年龄、学校级别、学位类型、学习兴趣、压力和满意度对学习行为的影响差异有统计学意义;在对验证集的预测中,线性回归模型的敏感度为0.484,特异度为0.914,准确率为0.801。四种机器学习算法的各项指标均高于线性回归模型,其中随机森林的提升度最高。结论线性回归模型对研究生学习行为的预测效果良好,机器学习在预测准确性上优于线性回归模型,但传统线性回归模型在计算效率和可解读性上具有一定优势。

关 键 词:学习行为  预测模型  线性回归  机器学习

Research on prediction model of learning behavior of clinical medical postgraduates-comparative analysis of linear regression and machine learning
Zhang Chi,Li Yanqing,Liu Deping,Wang Peizhong,Chen Tianzhi,Li Wenzhuo,Jia Jinzhong.Research on prediction model of learning behavior of clinical medical postgraduates-comparative analysis of linear regression and machine learning[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research,2021,20(3):350-355.
Authors:Zhang Chi  Li Yanqing  Liu Deping  Wang Peizhong  Chen Tianzhi  Li Wenzhuo  Jia Jinzhong
Institution:1Department of Education, Beijing Hospital / National Center of Gerontology / Institute of Geriatrics Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China; 2Department of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China; 3Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China; 4Graduate School Health Science Center of Peking University / National Steering Committee Secretariat of Medical Professional Degree Postgraduate Education, Beijing 100191, China
Abstract:Objective To compare the prediction efficiency of traditional linear regression model and four machine learning models on the learning behavior of clinical medical postgraduates,and to explore the pros and cons and applicability of different prediction models.Methods A total of 6,922 clinical medical postgraduates were surveyed,their comprehensive learning behavior scores were obtained through the learning behavior scale.In the training set,Lasso linear regression and artificial neural network,decision tree,Bootstrap random forest,and lifting tree were used to build prediction models respectively.The above models were used to predict the validation set data and compare the prediction efficiency.Results The comprehensive learning behavior score of clinical medical postgraduates was(3.31±0.54)points,and the overall compliance rate was 74.02%.In the linear regression model,the influence of age,school level,degree type,learning interest,pressure and satisfaction on learning behavior were statistically significant.In the prediction of validation set,the sensitivity,specificity,and accuracy of the linear regression model were 0.484,0.914,and 0.801,respectively.The indexes of the four machine learning models were higher than those of the traditional linear regression model,and the Bootstrap random forest had the highest elevation.Conclusion The linear regression model has a good prediction effect on learning behavior,and machine learning is superior to linear regression model in terms of accuracy of prediction.However,traditional linear regression models are superior to machine learning models in computational efficiency and interpretability.
Keywords:Learning behavior  Prediction model  Linear regression  Machine learning
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中华医学教育探索杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华医学教育探索杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号