以苄索氯胺和异丙醇为主要有效成分的消毒剂对牙科印模精度的影响

目的:探究以苄素氯胺和异丙醇为主要有效成分的消毒剂(Cavicide)对于牙科印模精度的影响。方法:体外试验评价Cavicide消毒剂对藻酸盐、聚醚橡胶和硅橡胶3种印模材料消毒后对印模精度的影响。应用高精度模型扫描仪(IScan D103i, Imetric)将标准模型数字化,使用藻酸盐、聚醚橡胶和硅橡胶材料分别制取标准模型的印模各30个,并将每种印模材料的30个印模随机平均分为3组,每组10个印模。在印模制取完成后,3组分别采用仅清水冲洗15 s(空白对照组,BC组)、2%(质量分数)戊二醛溶液浸泡30 min(戊二醛组,GD组)、Cavicide溶液表面喷洒5 min(Cavicide组,CC组)。采用模型扫描仪扫描印模,获得印模的数字化模型。在三维分析软件中,将印模扫描图像与标准模型的数字化模型进行配准,采用RMS作为评价印模与标准模型间偏差的参数。采用单因素方差分析比较3组间偏差,保存偏差的色谱图进行可视化分析。结果:聚醚橡胶及硅橡胶印模材料,3组间差异均无统计学意义(P=0.933,P=0.827);藻酸盐印模材料,GD组与BC组、GD组与CC组间差异均具有统计学意义(GD与 BC,P=0.001,GD与CC,P=0.002), BC组与CC组间差异无统计学意义(P=0.854)。结论:Cavicide喷洒消毒对聚醚橡胶、硅橡胶和藻酸盐印模的精度均未见影响。

Effect of disinfectant with benzethon chloramine and isopropanol as main active ingredients on the accuracy of dental impression

Objective: To assess the effect of disinfectant (Cavicide) with benzethon chloramine and isopropanol as main active ingredients disinfectant on dental impression accuracy. Methods: The effect of Cavicide on three impression materials (alginate, polyether and vinylpolysiloxane) were assessed using a standard model. The standard model was digitized by an extraoral scanner (IScan D103i, Imetric). For each kind of impression materials, thirty impressions were taken following the manufactures’ instruction in the same conditions. Subsequently, the impressions were randomly divided into three groups, with ten impressions in each group. After the impression taking was completed, the three groups underwent pure water rinse for 1 min (blank control, BC), 2% glutaraldehyde solution immersion disinfection for 30 min (glutaraldehyde, GD), and Cavicide solution spray disinfection for 5 min (Cavicide, CC), respectively. All the impressions were digitized by the extraoral scanner (IScan D103i, Imetric) after disinfection and exported to a dedicated three-dimensional analysis software (Geomagic Qualify 2014, Geomagic, USA). In the software, the digital models of the impressions were trimmed to teeth and then superimposed with the digitized standard model via best-fit alignment. Root mean square (RMS) was used to evaluate the deviations between the impression and the standard model. The deviation in the anterior and posterior regions was evaluated respectively. One-way ANOVA test and the LSD post-hoc test were used to compare the deviations between the three groups (P <0.05). The color map of each superimposition was saved for visual analysis. Results: For the polyether and vinylpolysiloxane materials, the difference between the three groups was not statistically significant (P=0.933, P=0.827). For the alginate material, the difference in posterior region between group GD and group BC, as well as group GD and group CC were statistically significant (GD vs. BC, P=0.001; GD vs. CC, P=0.002), while the difference between group BC and group CC was not statistically significant (P=0.854). The visual analysis showed an obvious deviation in the buccal-lingual direction in group GD. Conclusion: Disinfectant (Cavicide) with benzethon chloramine and isopropanol as main active ingredients using spray disinfection has no effect on the accuracy of the alginate, polyether and vinylpolysiloxane impressions.