首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

血浆叶酸两种常用检测方法检测结果的比较
引用本文:郝玲,郑俊池,田熠华,范大为,李竹.血浆叶酸两种常用检测方法检测结果的比较[J].北京大学学报(医学版),2004,36(2):210-214.
作者姓名:郝玲  郑俊池  田熠华  范大为  李竹
作者单位:北京大学生育健康研究所,北京,100083;北京大学生育健康研究所,北京,100083;北京大学生育健康研究所,北京,100083;北京大学生育健康研究所,北京,100083;北京大学生育健康研究所,北京,100083
摘    要:目的:比较目前常用的两种叶酸检测方法(微生物改良法和核素放射免疫法)的检测结果,寻找两者间的相互关系或规律.方法:对88例血浆标本分别进行微生物改良法和核素放射免疫法检测,通过曲线拟合,得到回归方程;利用回归方程对采自我国南北方部分地区2 422例成年人血浆标本的微生物改良法检测结果进行换算,比较两种方法得到的血浆叶酸营养状况在地区、季节和性别的分布特征,及其与饮酒、吸烟、体质指数以及高同型半胱氨酸血症危险性关系.结果:核素放射免疫法与微生物改良法的检测结果之间呈线性相关,相关系数r=0.879(P=0.000),回归方程为y=0.683X 0.308(其中X,y分别为微生物法和放免法检测值的自然对数值);两种方法得到的血浆叶酸营养状况在地区、季节和性别的分布特征,及其与饮酒、吸烟、体质指数以及高同型半胱氨酸血症危险性关系相同;微生物法检测血浆叶酸水平明显高于放射免疫法.换算后的放射免疫法数据显示,我国19.9%南方人群和67.1%北方人群血浆叶酸低于6.8 nmol/L.结论:微生物改良法与核素放射免疫法检测结果之间有较好的相关性;但对评价人群叶酸营养水平而言,两种方法检测结果之间差异较大.建议将微生物改良法血浆叶酸缺乏判定标准定为10.5 nmol/L,但有待进一步研究证实.

关 键 词:叶酸  微生物测定法  放射免疫测定
文章编号:1671-167X(2004)02-0210-05
修稿时间:2004年3月2日

Comparative study of the detection of plasma folate with microbial assay and radioimmunoassay
Ling Hao,Jun-chi Zheng,Yi-hua Tian,Da-wei Fan,Zhu Li.Comparative study of the detection of plasma folate with microbial assay and radioimmunoassay[J].Journal of Peking University:Health Sciences,2004,36(2):210-214.
Authors:Ling Hao  Jun-chi Zheng  Yi-hua Tian  Da-wei Fan  Zhu Li
Institution:Peking University Institute of Reproductive & Child Health, Beijing 100083, China. haoling@healthychildren.org.cn
Abstract:Objective: To compare two methods (microbial assay and radioimmunoassay) for measuring plasma folate concentrations, and to examine the relationship between plasma folate levels, and alcohol consumption, tobacco use and body mass index, and the risk of hyperhomocysteinemia in China. Methods: We used a microtiter plate microbial assay and a radioimmunoassay to measure the folate concentration in 88 plasma samples. After comparing the results of these two methods and fitting a regression line, we examined the geographical, seasonal, and gender differences in folate concentration of plasma collected from 2 422 adults in south and north areas in China, and evaluated the association of plasma folate concentration, with alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking, and body mass index, and with the risk of hyperhomocysteinemia, using the data from the two assays. Results: The data from the two assays had a linear relationship ( r =0.879, P =0.000); the regression was Y =0.683 X 0.308 (where X and Y were nature logarithmic transformations of plasma folate by microbial assay and radioimmunoassay, respectively); however, the mean plasma folate levels by microbial assay were much higher than those obtained by radioimmunoassay. Both data sets showed similar plasma folate distributions among Chinese adults, associations with other risk factors, and the risk of hyperhomocysteinemia. We estimated that 19.9% of the Southerners and 67.1% of the Northerners had plasma folate concentrations by radioimmunoassay lower than the 6.8 nmol/L used to define plasma folate deficiency. Conclusion: There is a linear relationship between plasma folate levels determined by microbial assay and radioimmunoassay, but because of the different levels obtained in the two assays, it is difficult to use the microbial assay results to evaluate folate status at this time. The use of 10.5 nmol/L as a cut off for plasma folate deficiency by microbial assay needs further study.
Keywords:Folic acid  Microbial assay  Radioimmunoassay
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号