首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

动态增强磁共振成像用于肌骨系统肿瘤定性诊断的可行性
引用本文:张晶,左盼莉,程克斌,于爱红,程晓光.动态增强磁共振成像用于肌骨系统肿瘤定性诊断的可行性[J].北京大学学报(医学版),2016,48(2):287-291.
作者姓名:张晶  左盼莉  程克斌  于爱红  程晓光
作者单位:(1.北京积水潭医院放射科, 北京 100035; 2.西门子医疗有限公司核磁事业部, 北京 100102)
基金项目:北京市卫生系统高层次卫生技术人才培养项目(2009-02-03,2013-3-033)资助Supported by Beijing High Levels of Health Techni-cal Talent Team of Construction Project(2009-02-03,2013-3-033)
摘    要:目的:探讨动态增强磁共振成像(dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging,DCE-MRI)的药代动力学参数[如容量转移常数(volume transfer constant,Ktrans)、血管外细胞外容积分数(extravascular extracellular space distribute volume per unit tissue volume, Ve)和返流速率常数(microvascular permeability reflux constant,Kep)]用于肌骨系统肿瘤定性诊断中的可行性。方法: 选择2013年10月至2014年9月来北京积水潭医院就诊的肌骨系统肿瘤患者共34例进行回顾性分析,患者使用1.5T MR扫描仪进行检查,DCE MRI使用脂肪抑制3D VIBE(volumetric interpolated breath-hold exam)序列。根据病理诊断结果,将肿瘤分为良性、交界性及恶性,病灶所在层面的正常肌肉组织作为对照组,对每组肿瘤与对照组的Ktrans、Ve和Kep的差异进行配对t检验,对3组病变数据中的差异进行单因素方差分析,P<0.05认为差异具有统计学意义。结果: 良性肿瘤Ktrans和Kep值与对照组的差异无统计学意义,而Ve值与对照组比较有所升高。交界性肿瘤的Ktrans和Ve值明显高于对照组,而Kep与对照组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。恶性肿瘤的Ktrans、Kep和Ve值明显高于对照组。恶性肿瘤的Ktrans (P<0.001)和Kep (P<0.01)均高于良性和交界性肿瘤,Ve高于良性肿瘤(P<0.05),而与交界性肿瘤差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。良性和交界性肿瘤的Ktrans、Kep和Ve值之间的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论: DCE MRI药代动力学参数Ktrans和Kep可以反映肌骨系统良性、交界性和恶性肿瘤在毛细血管渗透性方面存在的差异,这将有助于肿瘤的定性诊断。

关 键 词:肌肉骨骼系统  肿瘤  磁共振成像  诊断  

Feasibility study of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging qualita-tive diagnosis of musculoskeletal tumors
ZHANG Jing,ZUO Pan-li,CHENG Ke-bin,YU Ai-hong,CHENG Xiao-guang.Feasibility study of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging qualita-tive diagnosis of musculoskeletal tumors[J].Journal of Peking University:Health Sciences,2016,48(2):287-291.
Authors:ZHANG Jing  ZUO Pan-li  CHENG Ke-bin  YU Ai-hong  CHENG Xiao-guang
Institution:(1. Department of Radiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing 100035, China; 2. Siemens Healthcare, Magnetic Resonance Collaboration Northeast Asia, Beijing 100102, China )
Abstract:Objective:To investigate the feasibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI)parameters in differentiating musculoskeletal tumors with different behaviours of pathological findings before therapy.Methods:A total of 34 subjects of musculoskeletal tumors were in-volved in this retrospective analysis.DCE-MRI was performed using a fat-saturated 3 D VIBE (volumetric interpolated breath-hold exam)imaging sequence with following parameters:FA,10 degree;TR/TE, 5.6/2.4 ms;slice thickness,4.0 mm with no intersection gap;field of view,310 mm ×213 mm;ma-trix,256 ×178;voxel size,1 .2 mm ×1 .2 mm ×4.0 mm;parallel imaging acceleration factor.The ac-tuation time for the DCE-MRI sequence was 255 s with a temporal resolution of 5 s and 40 image vo-lumes.Using pathological results as a gold standard,tumors were divided into benign,borderline and malignant tumors.Toft’s model was used for calculation of Ktrans (volume transfer constant),Ve (extra-vascular extracellular space distribute volume per unit tissue volume)and Kep(microvascular permeability reflux constant).Those parameters were compared between the lesions and the control tissues using paired t-tests.The one-way analysis of variance was used to assess the difference among benign,border-line and malignant tumors.P values <0.05 difference was statistically significant.Results:Based on the WHO Classification of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone(2012)criteria,34 patients were divided into three groups:1 1 for benign tumors,12 for borderline tumors,and 1 1 for malignancies.Compared with control tissues,Ktrans and Kepshowed no difference,but Ve was increased in benign tumors,Kep showed no diffe-rence,butKtransandVewereincreasedinborderlinetumors, Ktrans,KepandVewereincreasedin malignant tumors.Ktrans(P<0.001 )and Kep (P<0.01 )were significantly higher in malignant tumors than in benign and borderline tumors,but did not show any difference between benign tumors and border-line tumors.Ve was significantly higher in malignant tumors than in benign (P<0.05),but did not show any difference between malignant and borderline tumors,benign tumors and borderline tumors (P >0.05 ).Conclusion:DCE-MRI technique is useful to evaluate the pathological behaviour of musculoske-letal tumors.The quantitative analysis of DCE parameters in conjunction with conventional MR images can improve the accuracy of musculoskeletal tumor qualitative analysis.
Keywords:Musculoskeletal system  Neoplasms  Magnetic resonance imaging  Diagnosis
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《北京大学学报(医学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《北京大学学报(医学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号