首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

喉罩与气管插管在不同环境院前急救中的应用效果
引用本文:李明华,;腾飞跃,;张悦,;吴德根,;陆峰,;方邦江.喉罩与气管插管在不同环境院前急救中的应用效果[J].中华全科医师杂志,2014(10):858-860.
作者姓名:李明华  ;腾飞跃  ;张悦  ;吴德根  ;陆峰  ;方邦江
作者单位:[1]上海市医疗急救中心,200233; [2]上海中医药大学附属龙华医院急诊科,200233;
摘    要:将急救分站分为4组,A、C两组用喉罩,B、D两组用气管导管,在现场和车辆行进途中为心搏骤停患者建立高级气道.比较4组患者一次插管成功率、操作所需时间及复苏成功率.结果显示,A、C组在急救过程中一次插管成功率、复苏成功率高于B、D组,操作所需时间明显短于B、D组,两者比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).说明在院前急救时,运用喉罩通气较气管插管更快速有效,且操作方便、成功率高.

关 键 词:院前急救  喉罩

Application value of laryngeal mask airway and trachea cannula under different conditions of emergency medical service
Institution:Li Minghua, Teng Feiyue, Zhang Yue, Wu Degen, Lu Feng, Fang Bangjiang( Shanghai Medical Emergency Center, 200233, China)
Abstract:First-aid stations were divided randomly into 4 groups. Advanced airway for sudden cardiac arrest patients with laryngeal mask airway (LMA) was established in groups A and C while trachea cannula was inserted on spot of emergency medical service ( EMS ) or in ambulance in groups B and D. According to the results, the success rate of insertion and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) of groups A and C were higher than the other two groups (P 〈 0. 05). However, the required time was shorter ( P 〈 0. 05). Due to a difficult catheterization environment, LMA is more effective and convenient than trachea cannula in EMS.
Keywords:emergency medical service  laryngeal mask airway
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号