喉罩与气管插管在不同环境院前急救中的应用效果 |
| |
引用本文: | 李明华,;腾飞跃,;张悦,;吴德根,;陆峰,;方邦江.喉罩与气管插管在不同环境院前急救中的应用效果[J].中华全科医师杂志,2014(10):858-860. |
| |
作者姓名: | 李明华 ;腾飞跃 ;张悦 ;吴德根 ;陆峰 ;方邦江 |
| |
作者单位: | [1]上海市医疗急救中心,200233; [2]上海中医药大学附属龙华医院急诊科,200233; |
| |
摘 要: | 将急救分站分为4组,A、C两组用喉罩,B、D两组用气管导管,在现场和车辆行进途中为心搏骤停患者建立高级气道.比较4组患者一次插管成功率、操作所需时间及复苏成功率.结果显示,A、C组在急救过程中一次插管成功率、复苏成功率高于B、D组,操作所需时间明显短于B、D组,两者比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).说明在院前急救时,运用喉罩通气较气管插管更快速有效,且操作方便、成功率高.
|
关 键 词: | 院前急救 喉罩 |
Application value of laryngeal mask airway and trachea cannula under different conditions of emergency medical service |
| |
Institution: | Li Minghua, Teng Feiyue, Zhang Yue, Wu Degen, Lu Feng, Fang Bangjiang( Shanghai Medical Emergency Center, 200233, China) |
| |
Abstract: | First-aid stations were divided randomly into 4 groups. Advanced airway for sudden cardiac arrest patients with laryngeal mask airway (LMA) was established in groups A and C while trachea cannula was inserted on spot of emergency medical service ( EMS ) or in ambulance in groups B and D. According to the results, the success rate of insertion and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) of groups A and C were higher than the other two groups (P 〈 0. 05). However, the required time was shorter ( P 〈 0. 05). Due to a difficult catheterization environment, LMA is more effective and convenient than trachea cannula in EMS. |
| |
Keywords: | emergency medical service laryngeal mask airway |
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录! |
|