首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

全科住院医师临床综合能力评价指标体系的研究
引用本文:寿涓,祝培珠,张向杰,杨华.全科住院医师临床综合能力评价指标体系的研究[J].中华全科医师杂志,2013(1):25-29.
作者姓名:寿涓  祝培珠  张向杰  杨华
作者单位:复旦大学附属中山医院全科医学科复旦大学医学院全科医学系,上海200032
基金项目:上海市公共卫生三年行动计划全科医学重点学科建设项目(12GWZX1001)
摘    要:目的建立全科住院医师临床综合能力评价指标体系,有效地衡量全科医师的临床能力。方法在2010年11月至2011年10月间,采用改进的Delphi专家咨询法,在上海市全科医师规范化培训临床基地和社区基地,遴选33名相关专业(全科医疗、教学、行政管理)的专家进行了两轮函询。结果两轮函询中专家的积极系数均为100%;权威程度分别为0.852和0.855;评价指标重要性的专家协调系数分别为0.228和0.245(P=0.000),专家意见渐趋一致。最终建立了一套由5个一级指标(职业态度、沟通技能、临床能力、社区实践能力、职业发展能力)和36个二级指标组成的指标体系,用于上海市全科住院医师临床综合能力的评价。结论建立的指标体系设置合理,能全面、客观地衡量全科住院医师的临床综合能力。

关 键 词:教育考核  德尔菲技术  全科医师

Establishment of assessment system for comprehensive clinical competency of general practice residents
SHOU Juan,ZHU Shan-zhu,ZHANG Xiang-jie,YANG Hua.Establishment of assessment system for comprehensive clinical competency of general practice residents[J].Chinese JOurnal of General Practitioners,2013(1):25-29.
Authors:SHOU Juan  ZHU Shan-zhu  ZHANG Xiang-jie  YANG Hua
Institution:Department of General Practice, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai 200032 China
Abstract:Objective To establish a assessment system for comprehensive clinical competency of general practice residents. Methods An assessment system for comprehensive clinical competency of general practice residents was developed with modified Delphi expert consultation during November 2010 to October 2011. Thirty three experts in clinical practice, education and administration of general practice were invited for two-round Delphi questionnaire consultation. Results In two-round consultation, the expert activity coefficient was 100%, the authority coefficient was 0. 852 and 0. 855, and the coordination coefficient for the importance of the indicators was 0. 228 and 0. 245 respectively ( P : 0. 000). The opinions among the experts became consistent from round 1 to round 2. An assessment system was established, which consisted of 5 first-level (professionalism, communicate skills, clinical competency and professional development ability ) and 36 second-level indicators. Conclusion The index system established in this study may be used as references for evaluating comprehensive clinical abilities of general practitioners systematically and objectively.
Keywords:Educational measurement  Delphi technique  General practitioners
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号