首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

类风湿关节炎治疗的超声和临床评估
引用本文:陈丹,李永吉,王晓冰,朱小春.类风湿关节炎治疗的超声和临床评估[J].温州医学院学报,2014(6):431-434.
作者姓名:陈丹  李永吉  王晓冰  朱小春
作者单位:温州医科大学附属第一医院风湿免疫科,浙江温州325015
基金项目:温州市科技计划资助项目(Y20120172)。
摘    要:目的:探讨不同阶段类风湿关节炎(rheumatoidarthritis,RA)治疗的超声和临床评估。方法:分别选用早期RA患者(A组)和非早期RA患者(B组)共45例,予改善病情的抗风湿药物加用依那西普治疗3个月。主要评价标准是治疗前、治疗后检测病变关节的灰阶超声及能量多普勒超声等各项指标变化,次要标准是临床、实验室、疾病活动性评分(diseaseactivityscore-28,DAS28)等各项指标变化。结果:与B组比较,A组能量多普勒超声评分在治疗6周(2.07±0.41vs3.93±0.40)、12周(0.51±0.27vs1.47±0.26)后均降低(P<0.01或P<0.05);A组与B组比较,治疗6周后的晨僵时间(0.00±0.04)minvs(0.16±0.04)min]、血沉(23.66±3.04)mm/hvs(36.84±2.97)mm/h]、C反应蛋白(6.29±1.79) mg/Lvs(11.37±1.75)mg/L]、健康评估问卷(HAQ)评分(7.43±1.07vs12.73±0.97)和治疗12周后的血沉(15.34±1.91)mm/hvs(23.11±1.87)mm/h]、HAQ评分(2.71±0.98vs7.37±0.89)、DAS28(2.50±0.21vs3.20±0.20)均降低(P<0.05或P<0.01)。多数患者的超声缓解晚于临床和实验室的缓解。结论:依那西普联合抗风湿药物治疗对早期和非早期RA均有疗效,但对早期RA疗效更佳,超声检查能正确反映RA的关节病变,在RA随访治疗中应同时结合超声检查。

关 键 词:超声评估  治疗  依那西普  关节炎  类风湿

Ultrasound and clinical assessment on the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis
CHEN Dan,LI Yongji,WANG Xiaobing,ZHU Xiaochun.Ultrasound and clinical assessment on the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis[J].Journal of Wenzhou Medical College,2014(6):431-434.
Authors:CHEN Dan  LI Yongji  WANG Xiaobing  ZHU Xiaochun
Institution:( Department of Rheumatology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325015)
Abstract:Objective: To estimate the value of ultrasound (US) and clinical assessment on the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in different stages.Method: Fourty-ifve RA patients, including early RA patients (group A) and non-early RA patients (group B) took traditional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and etanercept for three months. Main evaluation indicators included the gray-scale US (GSUS) and the power Doppler US(PDUS)of the joints before treatment, during and after treatment, secondary evaluation indicators were clinical features, laboratory results, DAS28.Results: Compared to group B, the improvement of PDUS was greater in group A than group B after treatment for 6 weeks (2.07±0.41 vs 3.93±0.40,P〈0.01) and 12 weeks (0.51±0.27 vs 1.47±0.26,P〈0.05). The group A showed lower morning stiffness (0.00±0.04 vs 0.16±0.04, P〈0.05), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (23.66±3.04 vs 36.84±2.97,P〈0.01), c-reactive protein (6.29±1.79 vs 11.37±1.75,P〈0.05), health assessment questionnaire (7.43±1.07 vs 12.73±0.97,P〈0.01) than group B after treatment of 6 weeks, as well as the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (15.34±1.91 vs 23.11±1.87,P〈0.01), health assessment questionnaire (2.71±0.98 vs 7.37±0.89,P〈0.01) and disease activity score-28 (2.50±0.21 vs 3.20±0.20, P〈0.05) after treatment of 12 weeks. And ultrasound alleviation was not showed in all clinical and laboratory remission.Conclusion: Ultrasound can accurately relfect the condition of RA involved joints, so it should be recommended in the follow-up of RA patients. Joint therapy with traditional DMARDs and etanercept helps for early and non-early RA patients, and the former is beneift more. Clinical and laboratory remission may not ex-clude joint inlfammation in ultrasound.
Keywords:ultrasound assessment  treatment  etanercept  arthritis  rheumatoid
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号