首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

舒适护理干预与常规护理干预在手术室应用效果对比分析
引用本文:梁思华,黄敏仪,张秋梅.舒适护理干预与常规护理干预在手术室应用效果对比分析[J].按摩与导引,2012(17):105-106.
作者姓名:梁思华  黄敏仪  张秋梅
作者单位:中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院南院,广州510120
摘    要:目的:探讨舒适护理在手术室护理工作中的效果.方法:将我院收治的300例需手术患者随机分为观察组和对照组各150例,观察组采用舒适护理,对照组为常规护理,比较患者心理评分和护理工作满意度.结果:观察组与对照组焦虑评分分别为(41.24±3.74)分、(53.68±4.26)分,抑郁评分分别为(36.73±4.26)分、(47.94±5.66)分,观察组的焦虑和抑郁评分显著低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.05);患者对护理的满意度比较:观察组为96.7%,对照组为82.7%,两组差异据有统计学意义(P〈0.05).结论:舒适护理可以提高手术室护理工作质量,值得临床推广.

关 键 词:舒适护理  护理干预  手术室

Analysis of Comfort care intervention with usual care intervention effect applied in the operating room
Liang Sihua,Huang Minyi,Zhang Qiumei.Analysis of Comfort care intervention with usual care intervention effect applied in the operating room[J].Chinese Manipulation & Qi Gong Therapy,2012(17):105-106.
Authors:Liang Sihua  Huang Minyi  Zhang Qiumei
Institution:Liang Sihua,Huang Minyi,Zhang Qiumei
Abstract:Objective:To discuss the effect of comfort care used in operating room. Methods:300 patients required surgery in our hospital were ran- domly divided into Observation group and the control group, control group received routine nursing care, the experimental group to take comfort nurs- ing care, psychological score and satisfaction of nursing care were compared. Result: Observation group and control group anxiety scores were (41. 24±3.74) ,(53. 68±4.26) ,depression scores were(36.73±4.26) ,(47.94±5.66) ,the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05). Patient satisfaction with care were compared :Observation group was 96.7 % and control group was 82.7%. Conclusion: Comfort care improves quality of care of operating room,which is worth of be used widely
Keywords:Comfort care Nursing intervention Operating rom
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号